Jump to content
CUNTS CORNER TWITTER ACCOUNT ID @CuntsCorner ×
Donations towards site upkeep will be thankfully received and faithfully applied....

£10,000 Feckless millennial scum handout


and

Recommended Posts

Say what you like about the influx from the Indian subcontinent, but at least they crammed themselves in twenty to a room.

On a semi-related note, just how many cunts were on that fucking Windrush?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Cuntybaws said:

Say what you like about the influx from the Indian subcontinent, but at least they crammed themselves in twenty to a room.

On a semi-related note, just how many cunts were on that fucking Windrush?

Every cunt slightly off white it seems. I might try to get a few quid because I once had a jerk chicken roti and a can of red stripe

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason I object to these cunts getting £10.000 for doing fuck-all is this, I ain't rich, I work for a living, I don't earn a great deal, but I pay my fucking way.

I don't give a fuck what some left-wing snowflake says about these millennial cunts needing a helping hand, fuck 'em.

And when I retire, if I live long enough, I ain't giving my hard-earned to some feckless toe-rag to spend on drugs, holdays or whores, because that is where it'll probably end up, the same reason I object to paying money to the EU, my taxes should be spent on our NHS and our public services, not the freeloading EU parasite cunts, they can go fuck themselves and any cunt who supports them.

Fuck you, fuck the EU, and fuck off, cunts!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, r-soles said:

the same reason I object to paying money to the EU, my taxes should be spent on our NHS and our public services, not the freeloading EU parasite cunts, they can go fuck themselves and any cunt who supports them.

Fuck you, fuck the EU, and fuck off, cunts!

 

Thank fucking God someone has finally mentioned the EU after four pages of relevant and interesting debate. I for one totally agree that the subject should be shoehorned into every single thread, regardless of relavancy, as I haven't heard nearly enough about it in recent Corner history.

You boring fucking wanker.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, r-soles said:

The reason I object to these cunts getting £10.000 for doing fuck-all is this, I ain't rich, I work for a living, I don't earn a great deal, but I pay my fucking way.

 

On the plus side you are rich in other respects, chiefly the unique differentiation in size between your great big mouth and tiny little brain. Surely such a blessing could yield extra income from well-funded anthropological institutions who specialise in the study of orang-utans.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 'eavensabove
4 hours ago, Decimus said:

Part of my work includes housing and the majority of people in social housing these days have accrued substantial arrears on their rent and have no capital to buy even if this was offered to them. If they can't or won't pay subsidised cheap rent the last thing this country needs is to give them mortgages that they will undoubtedly default on.

The simple answer would be for the government to encourage and provide the resources for local authorities to build more council houses. Unfortunately there isn't the political will, and even if there was, there is no money to fund this. I don't know how the housing issue can be solved, state intervention has pros and cons and the current situation obviously isn't working either. 

One of the most catastrophic affects on social housing was selling them off at ridiculously low prices. Most purchasers of these homes only had a limited income and some places would see an entire family chipping-in to secure a cheap buy. These people often struggled to pay their mortgages, and it became even worse when cunt Thatcher increased mortgage rates with the sole & calculated reason to snatch the homes back and make a larger mess of this country's housing needs whilst also plunging people into serious debts. ..  You're absolutely correct in saying that more homes should be built, and quick.  They built thousands of homes to house the thousands of homeless people after WWII and this country was almost bankrupt at that time, but never before had there been so many new homes built. It's also the case that less than TWO % of this country is built upon, and so the argument that we don't have the space is a pitiful excuse. I'm also sure that those who struggle to pay their extortionate rents for what they get, would much rather live in a cheaply-built home/prefab, similar to what some these people 'look forward to' spending a week in for their holidays. Many of these such homes can be made/purchased for less than 20k each, fully furnished.   

I'm not exactly ancient or retired and neither was I born with a golden ticket with which to make me rich, and even folks like me have struggled at times to keep on top of things in terms of 'money' and I've also worked fucking hard to get what I have in order to make my life a comfortable one. I don't agree that people like myself should be targeted to pave the way for the less fortunate.  We've been targeted enough along the way and it's not like we are within the top earning brackets at all... However, I'm sure that most would agree that those who are earning ridiculously high sums should be targeted to cough-up and made to pay more taxes. After all, TAX is what's needed to feed the pot that is required to make any difference. Not tax on ones belongings, but tax on what they earn. If you start by stripping the elderly of what they've achieved, then what is the inspiration behind making something out of life only to have it taken back?

I genuinely feel sorry for the younger generation in terms of what they are looking at in order to carve their own futures. ALL governments have failed to realise that everything costs the identical same for an adult of 18 to an adult of 90+  The young have NOTHING in their coffers to fall back-on. They have spent a chunk of their lives doing 'the right thing' by gaining a good education etc. etc. and yet still they have no light at the end of their tunnels and are faced with impossible costs to even rent a poxy room, travel and feed themselves or find work, despite many of them being more than capable and willing to do so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 'eavensabove
52 minutes ago, Stubby Pecker said:

Every cunt slightly off white it seems. I might try to get a few quid because I once had a jerk chicken roti and a can of red stripe

Jerking a chicken is a criminal offence Stubbs. Just saying like. You don't want to attract a bad name for yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mrs Roops said:

Punters have listed several reasons behind the housing crisis, all of them valid but I would relegate them as contributing factors. People need to understand two underlying sociological issues which paint a much larger picture.

1/ The breakdown of the traditional nuclear family unit; only two generations ago a boy and girl would meet, fall in love and think through their plans on deciding to marry. They would save with a building society, obtain a property and raise a family and on the whole, would stay together in one house. Couples who could not qualify to purchase a house would secure a guaranteed tenancy with the council. Universal family fracturing has resulted in the nuclear family being much less prevalent leading to an exponential demand of smaller living units.

2/ The changing nature of employment; again, only two generations ago people rarely changed employment - a job was for life. For good or bad that has now changed. The employment market now requires that people be more flexible and above all, more mobile thus creating more short-term demand.

These two factors have changed the housing demand paradigm. The supply side to the equation was facilitated by several reactions, some of which had unintended consequences. The main contributory supply facilitators are, but not limited to -.

The introduction of no-fault divorces and the relative ease in divorce proceedings.

Gordon Brown's pension raids, which was partly responsible for the destruction of the British pension infrastructure, once the envy of the world.  This led to people seeking to park their money into secure assets which provided better long-term returns and led to the boom of private landlords, facilitated by...

The introduction of the assured shorthold tenancy agreement.

The economic "big bang" which led to...

the removal of strict demarcation rules between market-makers, banks, brokers, management consultants and accountants.

The demutualisation of building societies.

So, what's the answer?

Nuclear war. A bit of nuclear winter will kill off most of the oldies and cut the population down to more manageable levels. Forty years underground will bring a much needed resurgence in national pride and every cunt would have employment in scrubbing air filters and general maintenance which would come in handy when they resurface to rebuild civilisation. Also every cunt would have thyroid cancer so the NHS would have great increases in funding and support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lady Penelope
17 minutes ago, Roadkill said:

Nuclear war. A bit of nuclear winter will kill off most of the oldies and cut the population down to more manageable levels. Forty years underground will bring a much needed resurgence in national pride and every cunt would have employment in scrubbing air filters and general maintenance which would come in handy when they resurface to rebuild civilisation. Also every cunt would have thyroid cancer so the NHS would have great increases in funding and support.

You will find that our beloved  (and mostly quite old leaders) will be in the shelter whilst anyone of actual use and young will be lying dead or maimed on the surface.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lady Penelope
23 minutes ago, Roadkill said:

Nuclear war. A bit of nuclear winter will kill off most of the oldies and cut the population down to more manageable levels. Forty years underground will bring a much needed resurgence in national pride and every cunt would have employment in scrubbing air filters and general maintenance which would come in handy when they resurface to rebuild civilisation. Also every cunt would have thyroid cancer so the NHS would have great increases in funding and support.

Back in the late 1960s there was talk of the USA building a underground shelter system than could give nuclearproof long term shelter for 105 million people. Story is that something was built but it will only be able to accommodate about 50,000 people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 'eavensabove
3 hours ago, Mrs Roops said:

Punters have listed several reasons behind the housing crisis, all of them valid but I would relegate them as contributing factors. People need to understand two underlying sociological issues which paint a much larger picture.

1/ The breakdown of the traditional nuclear family unit; only two generations ago a boy and girl would meet, fall in love and think through their plans on deciding to marry. They would save with a building society, obtain a property and raise a family and on the whole, would stay together in one house. Couples who could not qualify to purchase a house would secure a guaranteed tenancy with the council. Universal family fracturing has resulted in the nuclear family being much less prevalent leading to an exponential demand of smaller living units.

2/ The changing nature of employment; again, only two generations ago people rarely changed employment - a job was for life. For good or bad that has now changed. The employment market now requires that people be more flexible and above all, more mobile thus creating more short-term demand.

These two factors have changed the housing demand paradigm. The supply side to the equation was facilitated by several reactions, some of which had unintended consequences. The main contributory supply facilitators are, but not limited to -.

The introduction of no-fault divorces and the relative ease in divorce proceedings.

Gordon Brown's pension raids, which was partly responsible for the destruction of the British pension infrastructure, once the envy of the world.  This led to people seeking to park their money into secure assets which provided better long-term returns and led to the boom of private landlords, facilitated by...

The introduction of the assured shorthold tenancy agreement.

The economic "big bang" which led to...

the removal of strict demarcation rules between market-makers, banks, brokers, management consultants and accountants.

The demutualisation of building societies.

So, what's the answer?

and also,  our social system here in UK has made owning a property the most advantageous 'thing' in terms of investment, which in turn has affected the value of owning rather than the value of securing a place to live.  Some European countries such as say France & Germany for example, don't build or purchase a home specifically for investment purposes, but for their nations needs. Homes within those country's can generally be purchased for a small fraction of those purchased here, subject of course to their locality. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest White van man
10 hours ago, Decimus said:

Part of my work includes housing and the majority of people in social housing these days have accrued substantial arrears on their rent and have no capital to buy even if this was offered to them. If they can't or won't pay subsidised cheap rent the last thing this country needs is to give them mortgages that they will undoubtedly default on.

The simple answer would be for the government to encourage and provide the resources for local authorities to build more council houses. Unfortunately there isn't the political will, and even if there was, there is no money to fund this. I don't know how the housing issue can be solved, state intervention has pros and cons and the current situation obviously isn't working either. 

I agree, the housing shortage is now a central government problem, and private builders won't build cheap housing, so needs to be councils and housing associations building. A large number of people in the homes where housing associations took over the full council housing stock in that area, are working folk, who were unable at the time to raise a deposit. If the right to buy was given to them, they wouldn't need a deposit, as the mortgage lenders give 100% morgages to right to buy due to the discounts given, as they will never be in negative equity. The sale of these homes which might only be a quater of the stock, as i agree alot are incapable of even paying rent, could pay to build 300,000 new homes in a short space of time, on land already owned by councils. Council estates seem to be visually better where there's home owners mixed in with the renters. Young families could then rent a new home build through this process, knowing that in 5 years they too will have the option to right to buy. 

Obviously, this is all aimed at people who can't afford to buy on private estates at the moment, but could be used as the first step on the property ladder by anyone. It's self financing, and ongoing will perpetually provide homes for future generations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Drew P Pissflaps
12 hours ago, Decimus said:

Part of my work includes housing and the majority of people in social housing these days have accrued substantial arrears on their rent and have no capital to buy even if this was offered to them. If they can't or won't pay subsidised cheap rent the last thing this country needs is to give them mortgages that they will undoubtedly default on.

The simple answer would be for the government to encourage and provide the resources for local authorities to build more council houses. Unfortunately there isn't the political will, and even if there was, there is no money to fund this. I don't know how the housing issue can be solved, state intervention has pros and cons and the current situation obviously isn't working either. 

The spacky wankers that the council employ to manage the tenancies in said housing can't even deal with what they've got. Building even more houses to mis-manage isn't going to solve the problem. Employing cunts with a set of balls and a back bone to make tenants appreciate their homes might make a difference. Do you want a hand writing a resignation letter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Lady Penelope Of The North said:

Back in the late 1960s there was talk of the USA building a underground shelter system than could give nuclearproof long term shelter for 105 million people. Story is that something was built but it will only be able to accommodate about 50,000 people.

Yeah the Russians had a similar story - the Moscow Metro system was built with blast doors and air scrubbers, although a lot of it is old and has fallen into disrepair.  These days the politicians don't even give enough of a shit to even pretend that anyone who isn't on a government salary would have a chance of surviving.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Drew P Pissflaps

I work in housing too, but fortunately I just manage the estate so don't have to give a flying fuck about the despicable lazy scum that occupy some of the tenancies. It irritates me immensely when tenants complain about peeling paint and demand we redecorate via an Email that was sent from an i-phone. A fucking i - phone?  I can't even afford one of those, and therein lies the real problem. Maslows' hierarchy of needs is now a 50" smart LED, an i-phone, a pair of Nike trainers and a deep fat fryer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Drew P Pissflaps said:

I work in housing too, but fortunately I just manage the estate so don't have to give a flying fuck about the despicable lazy scum that occupy some of the tenancies. It irritates me immensely when tenants complain about peeling paint and demand we redecorate via an Email that was sent from an i-phone. A fucking i - phone?  I can't even afford one of those, and therein lies the real problem. Maslows' hierarchy of needs is now a 50" smart LED, an i-phone, a pair of Nike trainers and a deep fat fryer.

Are you the dodgy janitor changing the broken ball-cocks on the 17th floor ?

lol.

What a plebian retard......!!!!!!

lol.

Fuck off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lady Penelope
2 minutes ago, Punkape said:

Are you the dodgy janitor changing the broken ball-cocks on the 17th floor ?

lol.

What a plebian retard......!!!!!!

lol.

Fuck off.

Cat Hollick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Punkape said:

Are you the dodgy janitor changing the broken ball-cocks on the 17th floor

This is Drew we're talking about, the rat-faced, bungalow dwelling cunt hasn't risen higher than sea level since he last managed to get his cock up in 1974.

Lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Drew P Pissflaps
15 minutes ago, Punkape said:

Are you the dodgy janitor changing the broken ball-cocks on the 17th floor ?

lol.

What a plebian retard......!!!!!!

lol.

Fuck off.

Fuck off you slack ringed faggot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Drew P Pissflaps
8 minutes ago, Decimus said:

This is Drew we're talking about, the rat-faced, bungalow dwelling cunt hasn't risen higher than sea level since he last managed to get his cock up in 1974.

Lol.

I was hopefully expecting some sort of defence of your customers, Decs. Obviously not. Is your hatred of them really that much?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...