Jump to content
CUNTS CORNER TWITTER ACCOUNT ID @CuntsCorner ×
Donations towards site upkeep will be thankfully received and faithfully applied....

Porn Passes.


Guest 'eavensabove

Recommended Posts

Guest 'eavensabove
2 hours ago, Mrs Roops said:

Content providers won't see a penny of it. It used to be that producing porn was a licence to print money. Ironically t'internet has put paid to that as producers made their money from VCR and DVD sales. In its infancy, producers were happy to post teaser pages on link sites which generated revenue. Now that the www is universally available thousands of low cost producers have swamped the market. Nowadays, the successful producers are those that provide high quality niche content to limited audiences who have a particular bent. The Digital Economy Bill (Age Verification) will fail for a plethora of other reasons as well. Punters can now access a reliable, safe VPN from most proprietary anti-virus apps free of charge and producers can access servers abroad so unless the UK govt is willing to impose a Chinese style control on its citizens then the proposed legislation will simply not work. The govt might just get away with this in regards to mainstream VoD streaming with publishers like Netflix but that's about it.

I've previously mentioned that content providers are not happy with customer lists in the hands of a competitor but the BBFC have also got its knickers in a twist over trying to codify what is porn and what is "depraved" and consequently no one knows what type of content needs to be licenced. To give an example, rape, forced sex, female (but not male) centric dominatrix, bondage and pain (light spanking allowed!) will not pass the censor and perversely, female ejaculation is forbidden but male ejaculation is OK. I won't even go into American First Amendment issues but suffice to say a lot more work is needed by the Dept of Media Culture & Sport who are somewhat distracted by other more pressing issues.

… and so Your casting-couch rushes were a not a complete waste of Your time then? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Wizardsleeve
2 hours ago, Mrs Roops said:

Content providers won't see a penny of it. It used to be that producing porn was a licence to print money. Ironically t'internet has put paid to that as producers made their money from VCR and DVD sales. In its infancy, producers were happy to post teaser pages on link sites which generated revenue. Now that the www is universally available thousands of low cost producers have swamped the market. Nowadays, the successful producers are those that provide high quality niche content to limited audiences who have a particular bent. The Digital Economy Bill (Age Verification) will fail for a plethora of other reasons as well. Punters can now access a reliable, safe VPN from most proprietary anti-virus apps free of charge and producers can access servers abroad so unless the UK govt is willing to impose a Chinese style control on its citizens then the proposed legislation will simply not work. The govt might just get away with this in regards to mainstream VoD streaming with publishers like Netflix but that's about it.

I've previously mentioned that content providers are not happy with customer lists in the hands of a competitor but the BBFC have also got its knickers in a twist over trying to codify what is porn and what is "depraved" and consequently no one knows what type of content needs to be licenced. To give an example, rape, forced sex, female (but not male) centric dominatrix, bondage and pain (light spanking allowed!) will not pass the censor and perversely, female ejaculation is forbidden but male ejaculation is OK. I won't even go into American First Amendment issues but suffice to say a lot more work is needed by the Dept of Media Culture & Sport who are somewhat distracted by other more pressing issues.

Fucking hell, what else is there?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mrs Roops said:

Content providers won't see a penny of it. It used to be that producing porn was a licence to print money. Ironically t'internet has put paid to that as producers made their money from VCR and DVD sales. In its infancy, producers were happy to post teaser pages on link sites which generated revenue. Now that the www is universally available thousands of low cost producers have swamped the market. Nowadays, the successful producers are those that provide high quality niche content to limited audiences who have a particular bent. The Digital Economy Bill (Age Verification) will fail for a plethora of other reasons as well. Punters can now access a reliable, safe VPN from most proprietary anti-virus apps free of charge and producers can access servers abroad so unless the UK govt is willing to impose a Chinese style control on its citizens then the proposed legislation will simply not work. The govt might just get away with this in regards to mainstream VoD streaming with publishers like Netflix but that's about it.

I've previously mentioned that content providers are not happy with customer lists in the hands of a competitor but the BBFC have also got its knickers in a twist over trying to codify what is porn and what is "depraved" and consequently no one knows what type of content needs to be licenced. To give an example, rape, forced sex, female (but not male) centric dominatrix, bondage and pain (light spanking allowed!) will not pass the censor and perversely, female ejaculation is forbidden but male ejaculation is OK. I won't even go into American First Amendment issues but suffice to say a lot more work is needed by who are somewhat distracted by other more pressing issues.

I'll be applying for jobs with both the BBFC and the Dept of Media Culture & Sport, unfortunately my eyesight isn't as good as it once was, can't think why...😏

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 'eavensabove said:

… and so Your casting-couch rushes were a not a complete waste of Your time then? 

Um, not exactly. For two years whilst I was a stay-at-home mum I set up my own production company. It was a cottage industry that took a few hours per day. Just to be clear, I worked behind the camera as producer. The idea was to create and sell content to resellers and publishers with an eventual aim to have my own platform. In the end the business bored me silly looking at vaginas every day and I sold the business to an industry affiliate (these are guys who earn commission by creating link pages on behalf of producers and publishers) who wanted to branch out. The business is still going strong selling content to the likes of wearehairy and mature.nl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Wizardsleeve
3 hours ago, Mrs Roops said:

Um, not exactly. For two years whilst I was a stay-at-home mum I set up my own production company. It was a cottage industry that took a few hours per day. Just to be clear, I worked behind the camera as producer. The idea was to create and sell content to resellers and publishers with an eventual aim to have my own platform. In the end the business bored me silly looking at vaginas every day and I sold the business to an industry affiliate (these are guys who earn commission by creating link pages on behalf of producers and publishers) who wanted to branch out. The business is still going strong selling content to the likes of wearehairy and mature.nl.

Please, must we be subject to such graphic depictions of Pen's numerous faults?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DrCunt
3 hours ago, Mrs Roops said:

Um, not exactly. For two years whilst I was a stay-at-home mum I set up my own production company. It was a cottage industry that took a few hours per day. Just to be clear, I worked behind the camera as producer. The idea was to create and sell content to resellers and publishers with an eventual aim to have my own platform. In the end the business bored me silly looking at vaginas every day and I sold the business to an industry affiliate (these are guys who earn commission by creating link pages on behalf of producers and publishers) who wanted to branch out. The business is still going strong selling content to the likes of wearehairy and mature.nl.

I can't imagine this would prevent you continuing to tout images of your ragged old clopper. That's surely categorised as horror.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 26/03/2019 at 14:04, camberwell gypsy said:

I believe one esteemed member of CC has a satellite dish in his garden that can get porn from even the far reaches of the old Soviet Asia,  that needs no porn pass. 

I’ve got one of those videos on Betamax.  Sexy girls with beards go wild in khazakstan 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, DrCunt said:

I can't imagine this would prevent you continuing to tout images of your ragged old clopper. That's surely categorised as horror.

Business is business, so no apologies, in any case, to borrow a fellow punter's analogy, one man's Rembrandt is another's Harris. Tell us more about your Eurotophobia, please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Wizardsleeve
7 hours ago, camberwell gypsy said:

We saw plenty of your Harris in that pic if I remember correctly 

Rembrandt cut off his ear for his art, Gyps.  Give credit when due, roops engaged in no such self mutilation for hers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
On ‎26‎/‎03‎/‎2019 at 15:16, Mrs Roops said:

Not going to happen, not his year maybe not ever. Effective 1st April the scheme will be voluntary. The Digital Economy Act has been watered down because no-one, especially the content providers, are satisfied that the licencing agent is competent enough to hold private data securely. Content providers are especially vexed that the preferred choice of licensing administrator is operated by the same firm that owns YouPorn as this gives them an unfair competitive advantage of knowing the porn preferences 20 million UK users. After April the worst that the regulator (the venerable BBFC) can do is "ask" paywall firms to withhold payment to content providers who aren't using an age verification service. 

Rest easy guys, as predicted the Digital Economy Act has been kicked into touch.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...