Should the Police mount a drugs raid on the House of Commons ?

[Cuntybaws]

2 hours ago, Last Cunt Standing said:

Yeah, but as the Thomist assumption of non-overlap is shite, this calculation is not accurate. 

Think of it more as the Pauli exclusion principle and it makes more sense.

2 hours ago, Betterthanyou said:

Occam's razor would of done the trick.

Indeed it would have. 

[Guest judgetwi]

11 hours ago, Cuntybaws said:

Assuming that each angel contains at least one bit of information (fallen / not fallen), and that the point of the pin is a sphere of diameter of an Ångström (R=10exp-10 m) and has a total mass of M=9.5*10exp-29 kilograms (equivalent to that of one iron atom), we can use the Bekenstein bound on information to calculate an upper bound on the angel density. In a system of diameter D and mass M, less than kDM distinguishable bits can exist, where k=2.57686*10exp43 bits/meter kg. This gives us a bound of just 2.448*10exp5 angels, far below the Schewe bound.

Note that this does not take the mass of angels into account. A finite angel mass-energy would increase the possible information density significantly. If each angel has a mass m, then the Bekenstein bound gives us N<kD(M+Nm). Beyond mcrit>1/kD ¼3.8807*10exp-34 kg this produces an unbounded maximal angel density as each angel contributes enough mass-energy to allow the information of an extra angel to move in, and so on.

However, if angels have mass, then the point of the pin will collapse into a black hole if c2R/2G< Nm (here we ignore the mass of the iron atom at the tip).For angels of human weight (80 kg), we get a limit of 4.2089*10exp14 angels. The maximal mass of any angel amenable to dance on the pin is 3.3671*10exp16 kg; at this point there is only room for a single angel.

The picture that emerges is that, for low angel masses, the number is bounded by the Bekenstein bound, and increases hyperbolically as mcrit is approached. However, the black hole bound decreases and the two bounds cross at mmax=1/(4GkM/cexp2+kD), very slightly below mcrit. This corresponds to the maximal angel density of Nmax=8.6766*10exp49 angels.

Quantum Gravity Treatment of the Angel Density Problem 

Interesting.

However, may I point out that you have omitted the life and times of famous golfer Angel Cabrera, dynamic Atletico Madrid winger, Angel Correa and , more familiar to you and your students, the pornographic actress Angel Cummings.

Therefore your hypothesis is refuted.

Abracadabra cunt!

[Eric Cuntman]

And Tony Montana's friend, Angel Fernandez, who is probably dead because of Omar Suarez. I never liked that piece of shit.

[Earl of Punkape]

On 10/06/2019 at 14:04, Last Cunt Standing said:

Yeah, but as the Thomist assumption of non-overlap is shite, this calculation is not accurate. 

Cretin.

[Penny Farthing]

8 minutes ago, Earl of Punkape said:

Cretin.

That's a bit harsh on cretins.

[Last Cunt Standing]

26 minutes ago, Earl of Punkape said:

Cretin.

There’s nothing wrong with my thyroid function thanks, you Papist new-money Ping-swinging faggot. Let’s be honest, you’ve spent more time in Public toilets than ever you did in Public School, and your faux outrage when Mtembe neglects to correctly re-tie your four-in-hand knot when he finishes wiping his deposit from your chin is fooling nobody.

Run along now Punky, you’ll be late for Mass, and it’s your turn to man the glory hole in the Confessional.