Mrs Roops

The R7 is way inferior to the R5 and a fraction of the price. That said, its much better suited for bird photography and a bargain. 👍

The sad part about your post is that you probably thought you were being smart. The problem is that when a person only capable of binary thinking asks binary questions and demands binary answers it results in specious reasoning and logic which can be exacerbated by ignorance. FYI, puberty blockers were developed to combat childhood conditions such as precocious puberty and certain types of dwarfism. Puberty blockers were also found to be useful in treating adults with endometriosis, breast and prostate cancer. It would be some years before puberty blockers and adolescent transgenderism came into the public (and some nutjobs) consciousness. As for the WEF 'promoting' insects as a protein my answer is so what? I'm sure within the scope of WEF policy documents they must support thousands of ideas, some good some bad. Solely agreeing to one concept does not equate to liking or disliking a talking shop that has outlived it's usefulness. As for your insincere signing off, I surprised you survive, let alone enjoy the day in view of your complete lack of critical thinking. Stay warm.

I'll read later, right now I'm in my forest greens, have a backpack of hideously expensive glass to use with my R5 and R7 and off to do some photography.

I didn't say you did, I was obviously being facetious, you pedant. Anyway, do you really want to revisit?

yes yes which ones? yes, with caveats, we already have fiat currency no no yes for what purpose?

When do you think, 'there is no contagious disease, all of which caused by bad chemistry from within' will become mainstream?

Ah yes, "alternative information" aka the opposite of reality...

Shocking. I should be cast out from The Corner not only for my imperiousness, appalling condescension and all round arrogance but for outright lying as well. Just an observation fan-boi, but you were very quick to pedantically highlight two schoolgirl errors - I'm thinking minnowgate, fresh or saltwater fish and of course, Rhine or Rhone - in fact you feasted on the items for several months yet on the big "lies" not a peep from you. Were you at best exaggerating or were you lying?

Yeah, it sucks for some people. My fees for my insight will be sent under separate cover (E&OE).

So no factual counter-points in your rebuttal, just waffle... Yeah, cod psychology aside, suck it up OCR, if punters are gonna play with matches then they shouldn't howl when burned. Incidentally, in this instance the raking over of coals was instigated by DC. (Post not powered by Google)

Absolutely, fan-boi - all three of you. As for your post, which surely is contender for 'wail of the week', perhaps you could expand further in your inevitable reply, the "tenuous errors" that I highlight. I would also add "normally during business hours" is the exception rather than the norm, in any case you have no idea where in the world I'm posting from, be it office, WFH, hotel or airport lounge etc. As for KB's vaccine passport, I think you're referring to the post where he was doing his usual showboating nonsense where he allegedly spent several months transversing Europe on one fake vaccine passport knocked up by by a "mate" of his and which was supplied a few months previously. When it was pointed out to him that the QR codes on said passports had a shelf life of only 30 days, he very quickly changed the story. Now, if you think that proved me "comprehensively" wrong then by all means knock yourself out and mark that up as a victory but don't go bitching on about being called out as an obsequious brown-nosed creep that you clearly are.

Of course the giveaway here is you pulling out all the stops from quantifying your "belief system" (hold that thought) which appears to be joining random dots, imaginary or otherwise, to suit a narrative which includes giving rise to the baseless inference that I lack "empathy" to a serious subject. For good measure you added visceral insults as if that was any substitute for reasoned argument. Hmm, "look in the mirror" indeed. In point of fact I have made no comment about 'Sound of Freedom' other to suggest the film's alleged popularity was due to the phenomenon of astroturfing by actors (as in the participant rather than the professional sense) who promulgate the QAnon conspiracy that at the heart of child trafficking are a rich satanist elite seeking the chemical adrenochrome as part of an illicit U.S. $150 billion industry for the compound. FYI, the compound can only be synthesized invitro. In other words the theory is scientifically bollox. As for the film per se, again, I have made no comment on its merits and demerits - by all accounts its a run-of-the-mill adventure best described as "a film for dads with brainworms". Setting aside Ballard & Caveziel's well-documented connections, the film is being used to beguile Joe Public into believing the QAnon theory has heft due to its apparent popularity, unfortunately the box office take isn't matched by bums on seats. The smoke and mirrors campaign worked with the poorly-informed gullible saps, hence KB rushing to The Corner with his questionable OP. Of course you and the brown-nosed boi then obliged and pandered to his nonsense.

What's behind the facetiousness, or are making it up as you go along?

Actually, you were taken off the ModQ mid April.

I'm pretty sure KB hails from N.Ireland, but you're the fan-boi and may know better.

Your sorta missing the point aren't you? Ballard (the real life protagonist) has been promoting the notion that adrenochrome is being harvested by traffickers (the reality is such "harvesting" can only be sourced synthetically) and Caveziel continues to promulgate QAnon falsehoods. There is no getting away from the fact that Angel Studios is a faith-based organisation and that the front page of their site is touting "Sound of Freedom" cinema tickets that are being bought yet no-one shows up to the screenings. As I said previously, all the elements of astroturfing are in place. Even you have confirmed that you have read "many" reports confirming this. Hey, I get it. You've been caught out contradicting yourself so naturally you kick off. Being in thrall to the aluminium clad brethren is not good for your sanity. Just sayin'.

Let's see now, I would've thought a brown-noser who continually rides the coattails of others would've thunk it, that's who.

Your selective blindness acting up again, Fends? Why QAnon supporters are promoting 'Sound of Freedom' : NPR There are many more articles in the same vein but I don't want to overload the few brain cells rattling around your head like two dried peas in an empty shoe-box. I not a cruel person after all.

Weasel words, Billy. Its not me throwing baseless allegations of being sinister or "supporting" paedophilia. Oh, and carry on using my tag line 'cos every time you use it you always end up falling flat on your face. Stay warm.

Well thanks for the bleedin' obvious explanation of QAnon . Anyway, you do realise that Angel Studios derives it's name from it's business model of attracting "angel investors" via an equity crowd-funding portal? Outstanding that you've walked into a pooh trap of your own making...

Stay warm indeed, Billy... Anyway congrats is due as you've got something right as your OP was posted two weeks ago - little acorns and all that... Suffice to say I ignored your piece of nonsense despite the obvious red flags contained therein as it was pretty small potatoes in the grand scheme of things and in any case your reputation as a gullible conspiracy sap is well known. The vid was uploaded a few days ago but it wasn't 'til Sunday when I had time to check my YouTube notifications. I've made no comment about the film yet you done the typical right-wing nutjob defence of when being called out you baselessly accuse people who have an opinion at variance to yours as supporting paedos or being sinister. Nice.

Since the revelation that you're open to believe that chicken-pox isn't a contagious disease, its safe to assume there is very little that you do understand no matter how much you jump up and down and scream. Still, by all accounts you've worked out which end of a brush is dipped into a tin of gloss, so well done you. In answer to your questions the film was financed by a "faith" production company by way of crowd-funding so given the connection of certain principles having connections to QAnon (and their nutjob conspiracy theories) together with a request for investors to "pay it forward" i.e. to book theatre seats for those who could not afford tickets then all the elements of astroturfing is in place. Talking of "half-baked garbage", your penultimate paragraph seem to confirm this...

Sounds like you've been mugged off. Again.

Clearly you've exempted yourself from last-word accusations... I previously remarked I've nothing more to add to LCS' comprehensive hatchet job on you but it strikes me there's nothing more needy than a punter whining about the lack of acknowledgement to any of [his] reasons bearing in mind you were caught out with your entirely made-up comment about the BBC's "stance" to mental health, not forgetting the insincere compliment about "making good points" yet in the same breath dismissing same as "collectively bullshit". With your schizophrenic, untidy and hypocritical approach to debate, half of which appears dependent on the froth of insults, please carry on - I have nothing to add on the matter.

That depends on your current levels of pedantry... Give the spurious retorts a rest, DC. You're foot-stomping and bawling reheated pejoratives in a vain belief that it somehow adds heft to your frantic reverse-ferreting. It doesn't, rather it makes you look red-faced - either from anger or embarrassment, probably both.