The more things change the more they stay the same. This “triumph of common sense” will cause more problems than it solves because it purports to enshrine the idea that you cannot tell someone else what they should believe or think ....... (tumbleweed) ....... which is precisely what the ill starred race relations act was seen as doing all those years ago. It appears that the law wants the penny and the bun. Whilst all these decisions are doubtless made to address difficult issues and improve things overall, all I see is groups of dissident and mutinous “dyed in the wool” bigots using this decision to foment unpleasantness and strife to make their point and get their own way. I understand ( but don’t agree) why this man, supported by his chums, brought this action and am glad (in a way) that it failed. But now , someone has to try and explain exactly why the action was overturned and precisely how and why this applies in this case and why it is different from others.