Mrs Roops

20 hours ago, Penny Farthing said:

I have been seeing some amazing Birds and butterflies in flight shots with the R7 .. perfectly sharp (unlike Jake) it looks to be a game changer.

The R7 is way inferior to the R5 and a fraction of the price. That said, its much better suited for bird photography and a bargain. 👍

20 hours ago, Jake The Muss said:

So you believe child sex trafficking is real but think it could be ok for youngsters to have puberty blockers (doesn't matter for what purpose), you would eat bugs but don't like the WEF (they promote this). Well it's like i thought, you're a mixed up crazy woman.

Enjoy your day.

The sad part about your post is that you probably thought you were being smart.

The problem is that when a person only capable of binary thinking asks binary questions and demands binary answers it results in specious reasoning and logic which can be exacerbated by ignorance. FYI, puberty blockers were developed to combat childhood conditions such as precocious puberty and certain types of dwarfism. Puberty blockers were also found to be useful in treating adults with endometriosis, breast and prostate cancer.  It would be some years before puberty blockers and adolescent transgenderism came into the public (and some nutjobs) consciousness.

As for the WEF 'promoting' insects as a protein my answer is so what? I'm sure within the scope of WEF policy documents they must support thousands of ideas, some good some bad. Solely agreeing to one concept does not equate to liking or disliking a talking shop that has outlived it's usefulness.

As for your insincere signing off, I surprised you survive, let alone enjoy the day in view of your complete lack of critical thinking. Stay warm.

2 minutes ago, Jake The Muss said:

Have you ever heard of Max Joesph Von Pettenkofer ? An interesting chap, i will send you a link as it's my belief there's a grey area about contagion.

http://scihi.org/max-von-pettenkofer/

I'll read later, right now I'm in my forest greens, have a backpack of hideously expensive glass to use with my R5 and R7 and off to do some photography.

1 hour ago, Dyslexic cnut said:

Remember your dishonest submission on here that I’d PM’d you my CV? (amongst other things.) You little Tom Pepper you. I don’t believe you should be ‘cast out from the Corner’ and don’t believe I’ve ever seriously suggested the same. Curious isn’t it? I highlighted your ‘pedant’ defence and, predictably, here it is a day later in all of its glory. The Queen of petulant minutiae bleating when she gets a healthy dose of her own medicine? It’s simply impossible for this to be funnier. It just is. 

I didn't say you did, I was obviously being facetious, you pedant.

Anyway, do you really want to revisit?

On 13/05/2021 at 14:08, Dyslexic cnut said:

It wasn’t even that extensive. It was the actual acronym of two, higher education qualifications which I thought was only fair as I’d ridiculed hers and she had asked for them. ‘CV?’...’potted’ or otherwise is complete bollocks and she knows it. She’s probably busy washing congealed orange peel out of her 1970’s clungebush.

On 13/05/2021 at 23:05, Mrs Roops said:

Well, the devil is in the detail - or rather the lack it. You did indeed supply two acronyms, but omitted to mention that you indicated the fields in which the degrees were awarded in which the subjects and scope were as different as chalk and cheese. You also omitted to mention that you provided a further qualification which inferred you had a highly paid and glamorous career. The icing on the cake was the stint of altruism where you put one of your professional qualifications to good use which bettered the lives of people who otherwise could not afford your services. One mo' thing; to earn the glittering prizes (which were hardly "Mickey Mouse" degrees) one would require a mindset that could assimilate complex detail and present a narrative in a calm and measured manner, and yet we have seen that when flustered you deflect by using patronising terms of endearment, you've even played the menopause card. Your PM was designed to impress, that it certainly did though not in the way you intended.

2 minutes ago, Jake The Muss said:

Forget about the film.

Do you believe that child sex trafficking is real ?

Do you think the covid injections are safe and effective ?

Do you think elections are secure ?

Do you think CBDC's are good ?

Do you think that the Biden's are criminals ?

Do you like the WEF ?

Would you eat bugs as a replacement ?

Do you agree with puberty blockers for youngsters ?

Yes or no answers please.

yes

yes

which ones?

yes, with caveats, we already have fiat currency

no

no

yes

for what purpose?

54 minutes ago, Jake The Muss said:

And there we have it, you jumped in blindly with both athlete's feet, i guess your testosterone got the better of you.

So alternative information is now the opposite of reality Wow, well done !!

Tell that to all those in history you had alternative information, if we kept to the main stream narrative then we would still believe the earth is flat ??? hold up a minute.

When do you think, 'there is no contagious disease, all of which caused by bad chemistry from within' will become mainstream?

15 minutes ago, Jake The Muss said:

I have always thought that the Roops thicko is a decent moderator and should stick to that one job, as for debate, she's ok at the start but when things start to burst her bubble and alternative information upsets her belief system, then it shows the narcissistic traits...it has to understand that it's ok to be wrong sometimes as that's how we learn.

Ah yes, "alternative information" aka the opposite of reality...

18 minutes ago, Dyslexic cnut said:

She’s outright lied and at best, deliberately mis-represented many things on here I’m sad to say. I enjoy the give and take as much as most of us in this place, but whilst you can debate a thief, a phoney or a con artist… it’s simply not possible with an outright liar. For those reasons, I’m out. 

Shocking. I should be cast out from The Corner not only for my imperiousness, appalling condescension and all round arrogance but for outright lying as well. Just an observation fan-boi, but you were very quick to pedantically highlight two schoolgirl errors - I'm thinking minnowgate, fresh or saltwater fish and of course, Rhine or Rhone - in fact you feasted on the items for several months yet on the big "lies" not a peep from you. Were you at best exaggerating or were you lying?

34 minutes ago, Old Chap Raasclaat said:

@Mrs Roops, I've noticed your output is around 97% with King Billy. I thought I'd ask your opinion on the cost of living crisis and the current UK economic climate (interest rates etc), you know, to add a bit of variety to your thoroughly interesting and oft times hilarious posts. I'm finding all of this economic shite and cost of living crisis astonishingly unbearable and I was wondering what you thought about it?

Yeah, it sucks for some people. My fees for my insight will be sent under separate cover (E&OE). 

35 minutes ago, Dyslexic cnut said:

Thin-skinned, arrogant and dishonest. Not the best traits for a competent moderator. You are so full of shit that should you be given a strong enema we’d be able to bury what’s left of you in a matchbox. Stay petty.

So no factual counter-points in your rebuttal, just waffle...

21 minutes ago, Old Chap Raasclaat said:

I've noticed you employ the James O'Brien technique when it comes to debate... Divert the conversation by bringing up some shit from ages ago (that not many remember) as your attack, twist the original point to suit your argument, throw in some big words that nobody uses in general everyday conversations (that also signifies extreme arrogance and narcissism and a little insecurity) and end with an insult. This is not acceptable Mrs Roops, we began our online counseling a while back, after you took the first step and admitted you can be wrong, yet you're seemingly unwilling to continue this necessary treatment. You didn't even pay for the last session, who the hell do think you are anyways, wasting my time like this?

Yeah, cod psychology aside, suck it up OCR, if punters are gonna play with matches then they shouldn't howl when burned. Incidentally, in this instance the raking over of coals was instigated by DC.

(Post not powered by Google)

21 hours ago, Dyslexic cnut said:

In short, anyone who disagrees with you and agrees with another punter is an idiot or a sycophant then? I’ve disagreed, and fallen out with KB over many of his opinions (real or chain-yanking.) The only time I’ve really sided with him, and one you’ve clearly never quite recovered from, was when you spouted utter nonesense about wether or not he could’ve travelled throughout Europe, or to Hungary, without a vaccine passport. You were comprehensively proven wrong. You then went into your usual Google spiral and even took to searching for ferry timetables between Holyhead and Ireland, you sad cow.

You’re very fond of highlighting even the most tenuous of errors but when your own are highlighted and you are, quite rightly, subjected to ridicule, well, they’re conveniently labelled as ‘semantic pedantry.’ You really are an irritating, graceless cuntess. Quite how such a high powered captain of multiple industries has the time to indulge in petty half-arsed squabbles on here on a daily basis, normally during business hours is quite beyond me and others I’m sure. Grow up and improve your limited and repetitive catchphrasey put downs or better still…fuck right off. Stay whataboutery warm…etc.

Absolutely, fan-boi - all three of you. 

As for your post, which surely is contender for 'wail of the week', perhaps you could expand further in your inevitable reply, the "tenuous errors" that I highlight. I would also add "normally during business hours" is the exception rather than the norm, in any case you have no idea where in the world I'm posting from, be it office, WFH, hotel or airport lounge etc.

As for KB's vaccine passport, I think you're referring to the post where he was doing his usual showboating nonsense where he allegedly spent several months transversing Europe on one fake vaccine passport knocked up by by a "mate" of his and which was supplied a few months previously. When it was pointed out to him that the QR codes on said passports had a shelf life of only 30 days, he very quickly changed the story. Now, if you think that proved me "comprehensively" wrong then by all means knock yourself out and mark that up as a victory but don't go bitching on about being called out as an obsequious brown-nosed creep that you clearly are.

10 hours ago, Jake The Muss said:

Oh dear,it appears you have lost the point. Your belief system is what's keeping you from other knowledge that may be true or may not. Here's my belief system, i take in all the information, the good, the bad and the ugly and i lean towards what makes sense but doesn't mean i agree with completely as there is always a grey area. 

Here's one thing i'm 100% sure of, authority lies and always have done and i don't believe a word that comes from government or their puppet media or any of their other puppets as they take a truth and wrap lies around it...but hey you believe what you want to and if you want to believe this is a QAnon film, then knock yourself out with that bullshit..but let's not get away from the fact that this is about child trafficking and everyone should be outraged about it. The sad thing here is, you don't seem to be outraged by this and are just concerned about sticking your know fuck all attitude in when you simply could of stayed away from this topic, it just shows you up for the someone who lacks empathy, you should look yourself in the mirror and be ashamed of yourself.

You're a truly cuntish individual...don't ever talk to me again.

9 hours ago, Jake The Muss said:

I have heard about freaks like Roops, they usually have a bigger cock than their male partner and are used to taking it up the ass, so it's asshole is already lubed up and ready for action, i bet the cunt has got a ginger beard.

Of course the giveaway here is you pulling out all the stops from quantifying your "belief system" (hold that thought) which appears to be joining random dots, imaginary or otherwise, to suit a narrative which includes giving rise to the baseless inference that I lack "empathy" to a serious subject. For good measure you added visceral insults as if that was any substitute for reasoned argument. Hmm, "look in the mirror" indeed.

In point of fact I have made no comment about 'Sound of Freedom' other to suggest the film's alleged popularity was due to the phenomenon of astroturfing by actors (as in the participant rather than the professional sense) who promulgate the QAnon conspiracy that at the heart of child trafficking are a rich satanist elite seeking the chemical adrenochrome as part of an illicit U.S. $150 billion industry for the compound. FYI, the compound can only be synthesized invitro. In other words the theory is scientifically bollox.

As for the film per se, again, I have made no comment on its merits and demerits - by all accounts its a run-of-the-mill adventure best described as "a film for dads with brainworms". Setting aside Ballard & Caveziel's well-documented connections, the film is being used to beguile Joe Public into believing the QAnon theory has heft due to its apparent popularity, unfortunately the box office take isn't matched by bums on seats. The smoke and mirrors campaign worked with the poorly-informed gullible saps, hence KB rushing to The Corner with his questionable OP. Of course you and the brown-nosed boi then obliged and pandered to his nonsense.

12 hours ago, King Billy said:

Ah yes NPR that bastion of truth and impartiality. 🤣😘

What's behind the facetiousness, or are making it up as you go along? 

8 hours ago, judgetwi said:

Billy boy, you should look up on YouTube a song by some bird called Natasha Owens. It’s called “Trump Won and You Know it.” It’s fucking brilliant! I’d post it on here but I don’t know how to do that stuff. Besides which, Mr Roops wouldn’t allow it because he’s shit scared of me. In fact you will probably never read this now I come to think of it.

Actually, you were taken off the ModQ mid April.

2 hours ago, Dyslexic cnut said:

So he’s Keralan?

I'm pretty sure KB hails from N.Ireland, but you're the fan-boi and may know better.

37 minutes ago, Jake The Muss said:

All that proves is that the studio and Ballard want nothing to do with QAnon conspiracy theories and the film doesn't hint towards the Q stuff in any way whatsoever...so no connection apart from some Q followers watching and liking the film. 

Really is that all you have, well i have seen many films about nazi's, suppose that makes me a nazi. Guilty by association hey.

I have proved my point that you have nothing, so have the last word and then fuck off.

Your sorta missing the point aren't you? Ballard (the real life protagonist) has been promoting the notion that adrenochrome is being harvested by traffickers (the reality is such "harvesting" can only be sourced synthetically) and Caveziel continues to promulgate QAnon falsehoods. There is no getting away from the fact that Angel Studios is a faith-based organisation and that the front page of their site is touting "Sound of Freedom" cinema tickets that are being bought yet no-one shows up to the screenings. As I said previously, all the elements of astroturfing are in place. Even you have confirmed that you have read "many" reports confirming this.

Hey, I get it. You've been caught out contradicting yourself so naturally you kick off. Being in thrall to the aluminium clad brethren is not good for your sanity. Just sayin'.

6 minutes ago, Dyslexic cnut said:

Well, bugger me. Who’d have thunk it?

Let's see now, I would've thought a brown-noser who continually rides the coattails of others would've thunk it, that's who.

24 minutes ago, Jake The Muss said:

Sometimes the blledin' obvious needs explaining as you have opened up your own can of worms with your heavy errection for QAnon.

Yeah of course every crowd-funding portal is connected to QAnon, where is the connection from this film to QAnon ? You can't just say that people who have watched this film also support QAnon, as that is as weak as it gets.

I want to see a real solid connection, get to work.

Your selective blindness acting up again, Fends?

Why QAnon supporters are promoting 'Sound of Freedom' : NPR

There are many more articles in the same vein but I don't want to overload the few brain cells rattling around your head like two dried peas in an empty shoe-box. I not a cruel person after all.

11 hours ago, King Billy said:

You can support whatever section of society you choose whether you’re being sinister or not. I reserve the right not to support them whether you find that sinister or not.

Different strokes for different folks. Stay warm 😘
 

Weasel words, Billy. Its not me throwing baseless allegations of being sinister or "supporting" paedophilia. Oh, and carry on using my tag line 'cos every time you use it you always end up falling flat on your face. Stay warm.

13 hours ago, Jake The Muss said:

Yeah, just like i thought, you never understood a word. 

Angel Studios picked up the film and i don't see any link with QAnon, but i'm sure you can find one, like Einstein said If the facts don't fit the theory, change the theory, but too often it's easier to keep the theory and change the facts..

You do know that QAnon isn't a thing ? Q is an information board and Anon are the anonymous who ask questions on the information board, of course your MSM heroes coined the term for whatever reason. Q is probably a psyop, by who ? no one knows that answer.

You really struggle with alternative information. 

Well thanks for the bleedin' obvious explanation of QAnon . Anyway, you do realise that Angel Studios derives it's name from it's business model of attracting "angel investors" via an equity crowd-funding portal? Outstanding that you've walked into a pooh trap of your own making...

20 hours ago, King Billy said:

The fact that it’s taken 2 weeks for you to find, swallow and post this paedo supporting video makes me seriously wonder about who’s been mugged here or is there something a little bit more sinister going on in your massive brain?  But I guess that’s to be expected when someones TDS is triggered and their reaction is ‘How dare anyone not agree with the widespread horrific abuse of children? I bet they don’t agree with murdering unborn babies too.’ I liked the way the ‘doo lally’ bitch tried to portray herself as just innocently and virtuously popping down to buy her ‘Oppenheimer’ tickets (now there’s a film which should  actually be classed as fiction due to there not being a category for blatant revisionist history) when she noticed that the ‘Q’Anon movie’ as she called it was showing and just had to find out why anyone would want to watch it? So she did the obvious thing and tried to buy a ticket to watch it 🤣. And she felt the need to let us know that she wouldn’t take up a handicapped seat (the sort of behaviour that the MAGA mob would definitely  boast about down at the bikers bar).

Anyway, you carry on sticking up for the paedos and I’ll carry on not. Stay warm. 😘

Stay warm indeed, Billy...

Anyway congrats is due as you've got something right as your OP was posted two weeks ago - little acorns and all that...

Suffice to say I ignored your piece of nonsense despite the obvious red flags contained therein as it was pretty small potatoes in the grand scheme of things and in any case your reputation as a gullible conspiracy sap is well known. The vid was uploaded a few days ago but it wasn't 'til Sunday when I had time to check my YouTube notifications. I've made no comment about the film yet you done the typical right-wing nutjob defence of when being called out you baselessly accuse people who have an opinion at variance to yours as supporting paedos or being sinister. Nice.

16 hours ago, Jake The Muss said:

You fucking thick ginger cunt, how the fuck is this a QAnon film ? did they fund it ? did they make it ? it is a made up story ? what other bollocks do you want to add ?

Last time i checked it was about child sex trafficking, you desperate cunt bucket.

Just to add, i have seen many reports over various platforms about people trying to get tickets for this and then being told it's sold out...when clearly there's no cunt there in many of the venues, makes me think why there's so much fuss over this, maybe many have plenty to hide, not that the film points to these people. Maybe certain people are afraid of public awareness regarding this disgusting abomination called child sex trafficking.

I understand perfectly that you won't understand what i said and reply with some half-baked garbage from your hollow brain.

Since the revelation that you're open to believe that chicken-pox isn't a contagious disease, its safe to assume there is very little that you do understand no matter how much you jump up and down and scream. Still, by all accounts you've worked out which end of a brush is dipped into a tin of gloss, so well done you.

In answer to your questions the film was financed by a "faith" production company by way of crowd-funding so given the connection of certain principles having connections to QAnon (and their nutjob conspiracy theories) together with a request for investors to "pay it forward" i.e. to book theatre seats for those who could not afford tickets then all the elements of astroturfing is in place. Talking of "half-baked garbage", your penultimate paragraph seem to confirm this...

On 18/07/2023 at 21:52, King Billy said:

The No1 at the US box office for nearly 3 weeks now, taking almost $100m so far. And that’s despite costing only $14m to make, being ignored by most of the MSM and worse still attacked by the likes of ‘THE GUARDIAN’ and ‘BLOOMBERG’ etc. as far right, QAnon conspiracy, without substance etc. etc etc. (insert your favourite fact check/debunk). Thank fuck we have these organisations to protect us gullible masses from the sustained onslaught of mis/disinformation that is targeted at us every day. 
Thank fuck for the left wing Marxist MSM which does everything in its power to protect the stupid public from seeing this latest attempt to trick the uneducated masses by showing them a film based on a true story, into a false belief that hundreds of thousands of children are trafficked, bought, sold, raped, murdered and worse (yes worse is possible) as the film shows, by the rich, powerful and ruling elite in Hollywood, Washington DC and at the highest levels of corporate America. 
The simple fact that the left and their media goons have decided that you should not see this film or hopefully even hear of its existence should be enough to show anyone who isn’t already awake that it’s time to wake up and check that your kids are still there in their bedroom where you last saw them a few hours previously.

’BARBIE the movie’ and ‘Indiana Jones’ whatever number the pile of shite is at now both left for dead by the paying public and rightly so.

 

Sounds like you've been mugged off. Again.

14 hours ago, Wolfie said:

You always seem to lose your control after your trusty diesel-powered ginge-o-mingematic vibrator packs up, this time leading you to literally froth at the gash at LCS's latest wandering thesis of suicidal boredom. 

DC's kinda right: you do get angry and embarrassed, but, rather like the fact you can't acknowledge any of the reasons in my BBC argument, such is your imperiousness, your first counteragrument is to "reverse-ferret" by latching onto plan-B.

Over to you, the site's leading, most obviously needy last-word merchant...

Clearly you've exempted yourself from last-word accusations...

I previously remarked I've nothing more to add to LCS' comprehensive hatchet job on you but it strikes me there's nothing more needy than a punter whining about the lack of acknowledgement to any of [his] reasons bearing in mind you were caught out with your entirely made-up comment about the BBC's "stance" to mental health, not forgetting the insincere compliment about "making good points" yet in the same breath dismissing same as "collectively bullshit".

With your schizophrenic, untidy and hypocritical approach to debate, half of which appears dependent on the froth of insults, please carry on - I have nothing to add on the matter.

11 hours ago, Dyslexic cnut said:

Would that be a salt water minnow?

That depends on your current levels of pedantry...

11 hours ago, Dyslexic cnut said:

She’s retorting at 8pm and has been all day. As the Spanish say…El Rattlero, or some such.

Give the spurious retorts a rest, DC. You're foot-stomping and bawling reheated pejoratives in a vain belief that it somehow adds heft to your frantic reverse-ferreting. It doesn't, rather it makes you look red-faced - either from anger or embarrassment, probably both.