scotty

...fur fucks sake.

Jim is a reference to his username.

What in the flying fuck are you blethering about?

That wasn't me Jim, you're thinking of someone else. And I'm not about to go trawling through a website called Cunts Corner looking for a nomination about some cunt shitting his keks, my browsing history is embarrassing enough already.

....there it goes again. Keep quiet for a few days gypps, I'm running out of clean boxers.

Depends what school it was. Assuming he's referring to a private one, then the answer is yes.

....or Who Killed Bambi.

I did some stage work for U2 on their first tour, back in the early 80s. They were shit then and they're still shit now.

What was her name?

He'll live on in the hallowed pages of Viz. I'm sure that's what he would have wanted.

....if you're an arsenal fan.

Works for me.

*trembles*

....there goes the hair trigger, thanks a lot mate.

Never fear. You'll find it again once wad shows back up.

Yes, those additional taxes will be hugely popular with the electorate, luke. The tories love raising taxes.

Because every shred of scientific evidence points towards it, and because no government or political body has anything whatsoever to gain from accepting the facts and acting on them. It would be far easier, far cheaper, and massively more politically popular to say it's all bollocks, let's just carry on as we are. They've reached a tipping point now, a bit like the scientific evidence linking lung cancer to smoking; it's simply not credible to deny the link any longer, the evidence is overwhelming. My guess is that it's a bit late, but probably worth a shot if the politicians can reach an agreement that means something. At least that might give future generations a chance.

I usually come on here just to take the piss and have a laugh, but there's something I've noticed about this phenomenon. Climate change is obviously happening, over 97% of scientists are in agreement on that, and most of them agree that there is at least a possibility that we are responsible for it. And we aren't gambling with something our species can afford to lose. What intrigues me is the deniers. Every time I've heard any group discussing this, there is a clear dividing line between the people stating the blindingly obvious, and the naysayers with their hands over their ears saying "no, no, no, not listening, can't hear you, isn't happening..." This baffled me for a while, but I've realised the difference between the two groups. The people saying that it's happening are usually those with no particular interest in what happens to the planet, those without children. I fall into that category myself; I haven't got any kids, and frankly I don't give enough of a fuck about anybody elses to alter my lifestyle. The planet will outlast me, so why should I care? The deniers are invariably people who have some sort of stake in the future, ie those with children. My theory is that although they know it's real, and happening as we speak, they cannot face the simple fact that we as a species are condemning their children and grandchildren to a pretty horrible future and and inevitable demise. Therefore they just ignore the overwhelming tide of scientific evidence and say they know better. It's a bit pathetic really.

Can't say I'd noticed, but what boils my piss is that every R4 news bulletin seems to have a story about some new drug or treatment which is going to keep us all alive for longer, followed immediately by an economic statement about the country being unable to pay pensions so we'll all have to work until we fucking drop. Cunts.

...as you have just so graphically pointed out.

A cold what?

Men always wake up with a hard on baws, and women always wake up with their mouth open. Coincidence? I think not.

Nah, I'll just shoot straight into the sink. That's a little trick neil taught me, he's the expert.

Gail Porter. You wouldn't get much change out of her now, the poor bint.

Stop it, I'm starting to sweat.