Jump to content
CUNTS CORNER TWITTER ACCOUNT ID @CuntsCorner ×
Donations towards site upkeep will be thankfully received and faithfully applied....

Goober

Members
  • Posts

    1,970
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Goober

  1. I actually feel sorry for the bloke. He's been thrown under a double decker that's been ordered to drive over him,  reverse, and then drive over him again, making sure there's plenty of wheel spin whilst the tyres are on the velcro.

    The Tories are beyond fucked. If they keep Liz they look incompetent, if they get rid of her so soon they look equally incompetent for anointing an idiot. 

    She'll probably cling on and get trounced by Starmer in a year or so. The shame of it will, hopefully, be unbearable for Maggie lite and she'll run to her local Happy Shopper for several bottles of Toilet Duck.

    Remember when people thought Boris was shite?

    The lessons are: better the devil you know, and be careful what you wish for. Jeremy Hunt will, I fear, be the next Tory leader. God fucking help us.

  2. On 05/10/2022 at 11:10, Wolfie said:

    '...it's water off a duck's back'

    This statement barely represents your manservant-like behaviour during my recent spats with LCS and Baws, during which time you didn't waste a moment jumping onto their coattails when you could see it was me each was engaged with.

    It's little wonder I picked you up on it, you cowardly little slimebag, despite giving you a wide berth for months. So I'll keep on doing my thing, thank you, and I suggest you continue with yours – which means I'll keep pushing you towards another meltdown (2, 3?), which seems increasingly feasible with the sheer amount of self-obsessive horseshit you submit.

    The fact I loathe your arrogant "I've got more qualifications than any member" guts will also be of great help.

    You utter fucking wanker.

    Superb. Keep trying, big bad Wolfie. Huff and puff as much as you like, but you don't blow, you suck.

    What a shambles you are.

    Get back to spell checking the site.

    • Like 1
  3. It looks as if those that sit on their arses all day are going to get rate of inflation 'pay' increases [because the clowns that govern us have painted themselves into a corner and are being held to ransom by the bleeding heart liberals] well above that which those of us that work for a living are, on average, receiving.

    I know LCS gets plenty of opprobrium for deserting This Sceptered Isle, but it's not looking like a stupid idea at the moment, despite him having to put up with sharks, flies, venomous armadillos, etc.

    Will you be happy when your employer gives you a 3.5% pay rise, citing uncertain economics, but those who milk your tax contributions get 10%, or possibly more?

    Fuck the underclasses. If, in future, they can't afford three visits to McDonalds a week it might incentivise them to pull their fingers out of their sweaty, slovenly arses.

    Marie Antoinette had it all wrong. Let them eat shit. Lazy bastards.

     

    • Like 5
  4. On 18/09/2022 at 13:57, Wolfie said:

    Nope, you eager little boot-cleaner. Each sport's authority places limits on fuel quantity and how much volume can be dispersed over x amount of time, comprising composition, pressure, flow speed etc. It makes sense... unlike this below.

    Your behaviour doesn't quite conform with your criticisms, does it? Ridiculous idiot.

    Well done. A long argument to defend the indefensible. If you say it's possible to "constrict" a fuel "type", who am I to argue?

    Wolfie, you seem to continually want to have a pop at me, but I don't see us as being fundamentally at odds. By all means carry on if you want,  but it's water off a duck's back and it's not productive. You do your thing, I'll do mine.

  5. 14 hours ago, Decimus said:

    I thought that the public's reaction when Dirty Diana died was cringeworthy, but this shit is on a totally different level.

    I'm embarrassed for this country and don't want to be associated with any of the bent-backed, fawning fucking idiots freezing to death whilst waiting in five mile queues for a chance to peek at a wooden box containing a heartless lizard.

    We're supposed to be a first world, highly advanced, 21st century society, yet this sort of cult of personality is more akin to fucking North Korea. At least in those dog eating cunts defence they're forced at gun point to act like wankers whenever one of the Kim's croak, what's our excuse?

    I agree with this, Decs, but I doubt she's in the box under that flag.

    Imagine some non Christian type getting in there and detonating the half pound of semtex he has up his arse. Our dear old Queen Liz, gawd bless her, would not be amused by being spread over the walls.

    She's been kicked into a hole already and her suspiciously dry-eyed descendants are milking the saps for all that they can.

    Make hay whilst the sun shines, it's not going to last much longer.

  6. 5 hours ago, Wolfie said:

    You're kind of missing the point, Drew. As sports go, they're very similar indeed, though I'm hardly surprised this fact has been lost on you. Both have a similar amount of teams (each at the pinnacle of technological development – Ferrari, McLaren, Aston Martin & Yahama, Suzuki, Honda and so forth), these using the world's best circuit racers to feed data back which is then used to develop their road-legal vehicles; each has a similar amount of drivers/riders; each has a weight limit and constrictions on fuel type; each has stringent rules on tyre compound and time useage; each has a similar qualifying framework & setup; each goes against the clock in a virtually identical way; each season has a similar amount of races (geographically and at the same time of year) with a mix of historic and new circuits; each has a similar political bias; and so on. Now, are you beginning to see these distinct similarities?

    Whether a 'rider requires significantly more skill' than an F1 driver is both somewhat irrelevant and a matter of opinion. Both necessitate a different skillset in different areas; it's a bit like comparing boxing to MMA. I do however acknowledge your obvious addiction to cheap alcohol, which frequently blights your judgement.

    Back at you, have this one on me, @Witheredscrote

    He's had a hard day, bless him.

  7. 4 hours ago, Wolfie said:

    Shut your fucking mouth, you shit-stirring old poof.

    We might utterly fucking despise each other, but you do have one redeeming feature, you're not Frank.

    Keep trying though, you're getting close now.

  8. On 16/09/2022 at 16:45, Wolfie said:

     

    Good God. What an angry, irritable, humourless toad you prove to be time and again, Dr Cunt. All Raas asked is which sports you like, and you've almost bitten his face off for it. As one of the site's most neutral and impartial posters, RK also seems fairly undeserving of your second mini hissy fit.

    Roops pushed you into a complete meltdown (leading to the emergence of your new moniker & avatar) a little over two years ago, when your anger got the better of you, and I've twice torn you a new arsehole because your vexing nature is so easily exposed.

    Calm the fuck down, you rattled little brat. You're the closest I've ever seen on this website to a teegage girl whose Christmas present failed to meet expectations. You late night, drunken, angry gobshite.

    Marvellous. That my presence here seems to make you so furious is a joy to me.

    How's that cunting business been going, Wolfie? Your stock seems to have taken an absolute pummelling lately.

    Stick to spell checking the entire site, there's a good boy.

    • Like 4
  9. 14 hours ago, Roadkill said:

    The cunt will never be proven guilty. The evidence "committed suicide" and he has a fuck ton of cash and influence exactly where it counts.

    I'm not giving the cunt my benefit of the doubt on top of everything else his cunt family helps themselves to out of my wallet. I'll point the finger all fucking day if it makes the cunt squirm.

    RK, I'm not convinced we're singing from different hymn sheets to be honest.

    Royals follow money, it doesn't mean that they are clever or ask the questions that they really need to.

    A bloke with a shit load of unearned privelege, that gets the fuck eyes and more from some bird that's sober and looks legal isn't going to ask questions, even if he reasonably should. If you think this women was entirely taken advantage of, and didn't know the situation, I'd question that judgement, whatever her cunt lawyers might claim.

    Epstein was, without question,  a despicable cunt that got off lightly. If he handed that tart around to a selection of his 'best friends' do you think she'd go after those with the most money, the billionaire American friends, or those that due to circumstances are highly likely to roll over and settle regardless of whether they actually did anything wrong?

    Easy target, little chance of claims being tested in court, big pay day. It's a no brainer. That photo, despite proving nothing, was enough.

    I despise privelege based purely on the cunt you've fallen out of. Unfortunately, the flip side of that is that I need to be even minded and defend the principle of innocent until proven guilty. Andrew was fucked by association the moment the finger was pointed and I'll also give him a tiny bit of credit for sticking it to the Argentinians.

    I've no doubt that he, along with the rest of his sponging family, despite BBC and current warped mass media reports, think we're all scum that exist solely to lick the shit from their boots and pay for their servants.

    • Like 1
  10. 45 minutes ago, Roadkill said:

    I'm pretty sure the Gryffindor knickers would be all the proof I needed that I was in a very precarious legal and moral situation.

    If it spends its time in the company of nonces, pays nonces vast sums of money and is photographed alongside barely legals whilst in the company of nonces, its a fucking nonce. 98% certified - I'll give the cunt 2% off the final rating, considering that's the amount of years Dora the Explorer was over the age limit when he undoubtedly fucked her.

    What figure looks more damning to you given the context?

    Why do you even fucking care what I think anyway? You said you said I'd misunderstood the "thrust of the post" and yet here you are arguing in the defence of a cunt you previously stated you would put up against the wall and shoot.

    Make up your fucking mind and get back to me.

     

    Simple really, I support the principle of innocent until proven guilty and I can see many, many reasons why he is likely to have been forced to roll over and take the humiliation and not defend himself.

    Is he a cunt, yes. Is he a paedo? In my opinion, based on a balanced view of the evidence that we know (a prince that would have an endless supply of fanny without needing to ask vs. a money hungry tart), unlikely.

    I'm not a red top reader. I know they are popular publications in the North though.

    If you think he was outcast because his family genuinely depise him, rather than the family's desire to avoid more scandal than necessary, that's your choice. I believe, despite being an overt republican, that he's been hung out to dry to protect the firm that milks us all dry.

    Fuck the lot of them, but I'll never point the finger unless I'm sure of the accusation.

    • Like 1
  11. 15 hours ago, Eric Cuntman said:

    No offence taken. I haven’t leant broodily against a nightclub door frame, oozing raw sex and masculinity for 2 years-ish.

    Most of the ones young enough to avoid, are only trying it on with you because they’re too pissed to even consider shagging anyway, or they’re trying to make their boyfriend jealous and will immediately accuse you of assaulting her hapless boyfriend when he falls for it and you spank the poor cunt defending yourself.

    I get what you’re saying. On this evidence alone, I wouldn’t call him a paedophile. But I wouldn’t be surprised to see some more sinister skeletons in his closet.

    Was this 20 years ago?

    Regardless, all true, without doubt, but would you deny that some of your former colleagues fucked eager women/girls of dubious age (17?) against the wheelie bins at the back of the club, just because they could?

    Did you think less of them because some tart got what they were gagging for?

    No arguments here, they shouldn't have, but when it's laid on a plate and there's no clear indication you're breaking the law or acting the complete cunt many men aren't going to think twice, I suspect.


    If there are more sinister skeletons in his closet, as you say, then I hope he gets what he deserves. Until then, I'll stick with innocent until proven guilty.

    • Like 1
  12. 16 hours ago, Roadkill said:

    OK. 👍

    I'm not disputing there is now a question mark there, RK. I'm not going to jump on board with the outraged masses though.

    As many thousands of squaddies, doormen (no offence intended, @Eric Cuntman) bartenders etc. etc. could (but wouldn't) testify, when a 17 year old throws herself on their cock, they don't ask to see proof of age beforehand. Not that they'd need to in this country.

    You alluded to if it were my daughter, and my response is no daughter of mine would find herself in that situation. If you think this tart didn't know the score I'd say that's naive. It's convenient to present this currently unproven case (and I say again, the bloke was never going to be allowed to defend himself, he was instructed to pay the money and gloss over it rather than stand in the witness box) as paedophilia. If it happened, I suspect, although I don't know, that it's a long way from being equivalent to sick fucks that prey on innocent children. If he does fall into that category, I'd have no problem watching him die very painfully.

    I despise the status quo and inherited privilege, but I'm not going to let that cloud, reasonable, balanced judgement to run alongside a witch hunt. Innocent until proven guilty, no?

    If you think I'm being unreasonable or irrational, then feel free to to try and kick me in my soft bits. If you have evidence that contradicts my position, I'm happy to hear it.

  13. 33 minutes ago, Old Chap Raasclaat said:

    What's with all this defensive shit Goober? What is this passing bandwagon you refer to? A bit Dyslexic? 

    Do you have an issue with me daring to question you not liking F1?

    I have no issue with you either, or anyone here for that matter, so why are you stating the obvious?

    Stop imitating Dyslexic Cunt then. I know you darkies like to be submissive to us whites, but I support your fight for equality.

  14. 1 minute ago, Roadkill said:

    It's OK, Goobs. I know you're just sore at me calling out your Prince Andrew crush and don't mean a word of it.

    Why would I be sore RK, when you totally misunderstood the thrust of the post, which was about unearned privelege and hypocrisy, not Prince Andrew and his perversions, or not, as the case may be.

    Fuck all the royals and the ships, paid for by us, that they sail in.

    F1 is, in my opinion, about as interesting as queueing 10 hours to walk past an empty flag covered wooden box.

  15. Why would I need to, when I have a hungry recipient eager for lubrication?

    OCR, I have nothing whatsoever against you, nor anyone else here for that matter, but if you think you're point scoring against an easy target by jumping on some imagined passing bandwagon, you need to reevaluate.

    You're coming across a bit Dyslexic, if you know what I mean. Metaphorically or literally, as you prefer.

    I'm fairly tame as contributors here go, but I have my own opinions and I'm happy too defend them, on the rare occasion I can be bothered, which isn't that often. Life's too short and there are far more interesting things to occupy one's time than arguing the toss on here. For me anyway.

  16. 10 hours ago, Decimus said:

    Take a leaf out of Frank's book and look into getting some sildenafil, you psychosexually abnormal, angry little wrong'un.

    Probably not the best idea for innocent citizens going about their daily lives.

  17. 2 minutes ago, King Billy said:

    I like Drew and so does Ape really imo. I think they both have mind altering ‘long Covid’ probably. Fuck knows how it got past Apes multiple masks and hourly medical advice from Roops, and found it’s way to his safe space under his bed though. Drew obviously contracted it from sharing 3 litre bottles of White Lightning with unmasked Covidiots and unvaxxed refuseniks (like me) during the really successful lockdowns, which saved the world from the killer virus (if you were over 80 and had at least ten comorbidities), and have been proven to have caused no harm whatsoever to the global economy, the mental and physical well-being of billions of people, and will undoubtedly be the default reaction for every future manufactured crisis, now that they’ve passed their first mass trial with flying colours.

    I’ve been banging a saucepan and clapping furiously at my front door tonight for both of them to get through this difficult time. 

    But could you eat a whole one?

  18. On 14/09/2022 at 17:45, Roadkill said:

    It's a shame Carlos isn't turning out the same way considering the shared nationality.

    This generation of drivers are boring, bratty little cunts when it comes to personality, outshined by the likes of Alonso, Raikkonen and even Magnussen who would have all themselves undoubtedly been called a bunch of puffs by the cunts on the grid in the 90's, 80's and especially the 70's.

    Any spark of personal opinion is buried under a mountain of PR and carefully crafted social media channels. Cunts just spend their time waiting for a fast enough car to dominate the next five years and sometimes domestically abusing their race engineers in the privacy of their motor homes when the stress gets to them.

     

    Not nearly as boring as people that bang on about possibly the dullest sport known to humankind all the time though.

    Oh for the days when one of the drivers died every other Grand Prix.

  19. The shit show in Edinburgh right now has the Queen's four children following the hearse. 

    Charles - Full military uniform, festooned in medals. Barely served in the military. Never saw action. 

    Anne - Full military uniform, festooned in medals. Never served in the military. 

    Edward - Full military uniform, a good few medals. Joined the Royal Marines, couldn't hack it and quit. 

    Andrew. Wearing a suit with a good few medals, some of which were actually earned. Joined the Royal Navy in 1979. Retired from active duty in 2001 at the rank of Commander. Ultimately promoted to Vice Admiral in retirement. Saw active duty. 

    I fucking despair. 

    All because, allegedly, he fucked a 17 year old tart that had more sausage than the average German butcher. 

    Fuck the lot of them. 

  20. 1 hour ago, Stubby Pecker said:

    Due to my kids age, there was a time when I watched a lot of CBeebies. So when old Bernard comes to mind, I think of Old Jacks Boat and this saucy minx. A true danger wank.

    large.9A918C6D-3B00-41DC-B63C-921D144D968C.jpeg.2f9ed9edc6dccf05034577c23c0773e6.jpeg

     

    I hope you felt dirty when the vinegar stroke coincided with the moment Bernard's mug filled the screen.

×
×
  • Create New...