Mrs Roops

No

I'm not sure if KB is that way inclined. Still, whilst The Corner is an inclusive church its brave of you to come out of the closet.

Your hypocrisy in constantly barking out "answer the question" whilst pointedly avoiding answering any yourself is noted. In fact the history of mRNA has been discussed before and reasserted many times... With your hypocrisy, selective memory, ignorance, third rate mind, false facts, fake news and bogus science this would, in the normal course of events, mean that your pretty much done here but with your zero cognitive abilities you'll no doubt carry on regardless. So, with that in mind, what happened to your prediction for the 22nd May 2022? Also given that you're not "anti-vax" have you taken the Novavax jab yet? Do tell...

As much chance as your work 'ramping up', you unemployable oddity.

The question has already been answered as part of a comprehensive analysis by m'learned colleague. I'm surprised that a punter who isn't a "mug/thicko/Sid Slackjaw/tinfoil hat weirdo" missed this. As you now appear to be a stickler for 'answering the question' perhaps you could now present an overdue report on your scoop that 194 world leaders were to convene on the 22nd May 2022 and sign over statutory powers to the WHO bureaucrats in Geneva. As I recall you were in a visible state of excitement at the thought of covering me in egg so I'm curious as to why we've since heard nothing from you on this matter.

You're right of course, which is why for the past few weeks I have in fact scaled down the fact-checking not only for the reason you allude to but also its now obvious to the vast majority of Corner punters that he is not the current affairs sage that he proports to be.

KB, stop it - you're jumping around like a cat on a hot tin roof flying off in different tangents, constantly looking for different angles which always seem to be sourced from your Slackjaw news feed which you obviously spend hours on. Firstly you said Covid 19 didn't exist, then it did but the pandemic was actually a plot hatched by the Chinese to dominate the world, next Covid was, after all, 'The Great Reset's' chosen mechanism to financially control mankind. Bill Gates was dragged into the mix courtesy of one of your join-the dots conspiracies. Elsewhere you've just hinted that the Democrats are about to steal another election using a new Covid wave as an excuse. Intermixed in all this we've had an endless stream of scare stories which upon closer examination were found to be totally without merit. Give it a rest.

No, you're more interested in cementing your pole position in the 'Brown-nose of the year' award.

Lovely. This is a puff-piece in one of many EU Corporate Communication's (aka 'the PR department') glossy mags which extol the virtues of EU membership. At least the EU's PR department had the decency to say, "The information and views set out in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union". However I have an issue with "Our articles are written by independent science journalists." Funny, I thought Ms Whiting was the well known journo who specialises in Italian politics and er...food. Still, you've cited the article so I'll run with it... In fact the article is a rebuttal compendium of all the previous lies slavishly regurgitated from the Slackjaw News Service. Firstly, Ms Whiting describes the mRNA vaccines as "vaccines", not "its not really a vaccine" nor are they "therapeutics" Secondly, the author confirms that mRNA vaccines do not alter a person's DNA. Thirdly, nor does the vaccine give you cancer. Fourthly, corners were not cut in the clinical trials and approval process. Fifthly, and I am not surprised you made no mention of this, that there is a whole paragraph with a header that says, mRNA vaccines are not entirely new". Indeed they are not as I have previously explained ad nauseum. The error in your cited article is poor sub-editing or rather no sub-editing. It should have said "the worlds first mRNA Covid vaccine" but because you are a gullible mug you creamed yourself and ran with it. Time for another egg wash bath...

I've never articulated such sentiments. Stop making stuff up.

This is the fourth question in as many days in which you're "interested" in my opinion. I suspect that your "interest" is limited to generating a 'gotcha' moment rather than any genuine enquiry or clarification... Still, what do you mean by "alarming numbers"? Quantify and explain why they are "alarming".

All of this avoids answering the question, why do you repeat the same lie over and over again? Before you answer take a few minutes to educate yourself and understand what a vaccine is, paying particular attention to the difference between prophylactic and therapeutic. Hopefully next time you won't end up looking like a totally clueless pratt who's just immersed himself in egg sauce. Again.

Naturally your mug gene draws you to Bert Weinstein (producer of the podcast), a noted "Covid-19 contrarian and spreader of disinformation". Weinstein has in the past admitted he "misstated" a study that erroneously alleged ivermectin as a 100% effective protocol for the prevention of Covid. As for Nawaz, I have much respect for a Muslim who advocates secular Islam however he will not resonate with viewers if he equates his time in an Egyptian prison to life in the UK. Your problem is that your central premise is predicated on the notion that mRNA vaccines are "experimental" when they are not. Why do you keep repeating the lie? Were you expecting a different result? Remind us again about that old definition of insanity quote you mentioned in the proceeding post.

Are these your own thoughts or have you re-hashed someone else's opinion? Whatever...you appear to have conflated several issues in an effort to avoid acknowledging the obvious. FWIW, I don't think anyone wants to return to lockdowns and enforced social distancing but we'll see.

I don't ponder absurdities.

A fatuous question to say the least. The answer is that's for me to know and for you to ponder, in any case what relevance has this to with my previous reply?

KB has no point except to parade a non-existent insight that he merely copies from the Slackjaw News Service. Even though he repeatedly dives head-first into a vat of dried egg-powder he still persists which itself gives an insight into his critical thinking abilities, but I digress... To answer your question, I believe Gates owns about a quarter million acres of farmland, which whilst impressive, pales into insignificance compared to the major land-owning concerns. Ted Turner for example owns in excess of two and half million acres and its not unknown for Australian sheep stations to own in excess of two million acres. In the land-owning stakes Gates is a minor league player. Now, if you want me to play the conspiracy game I'd imagine Gates is buying up land and other green-wash investments as a hedge against increasingly stringent carbon offset rules and to mitigate against potential tax liabilities especially taxation linked to climate change.

One could be forgiven as to which "Billy Boy" you refer to...

Desperate, what a strange little man you've become, Billy.

At this rate aluminium will become a rare earth metal... Naturally, the usual caveats apply...

What's your point?

Clearly your anti British sentiment has affected your eyesight...an example of the benefits of UK independence from the EU was negotiating the supply of vaccines whilst Mrs von der Leyen and her cohorts of committees and sub-committees fannied about with the drug suppliers - as I alluded in a previous post. We all witnessed the EU's subsequent petulance by threatening to impound the vaccines for the UK.

Actually, she does and is.

I did. Obviously you didn't like it...