Jump to content
CUNTS CORNER TWITTER ACCOUNT ID @CuntsCorner ×
Donations towards site upkeep will be thankfully received and faithfully applied....

Mrs Roops

Administrators
  • Posts

    6,388
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mrs Roops

  1. @truestory Despite my instructions to cease and desist with the VPN's you are still flitting between Vienna, Cyprus and Algiers - all from your home in the Isle of Wight. The randomness of the spoofing suggests you are using a free-to-use VPN making you, the site and other punters susceptible to malware and viruses so we'll call it a day and part ways. Cya.
  2. The purpose of The Corner is not about being a cunt but to name and discuss the cunts of the world. The clue is on the header tag-line on top of every page within the website. That said, the site's proprietors accept that there will some needling between the puntership. The owners have always maintained that The Corner is a broad church so we are not going to get rid of someone simply because a group of entitled noise-makers do not like someone or his/her style. As I intimated earlier - use the 'ignore' facility, its not that difficult.
  3. Well, you're using VPN servers in Cyprus and Austria. We have an issue of punters running multi accounts by way of proxies so as per Rule 5, cease and desist with the VPNs or leave the site.
  4. Compare and contrast my post count of 6.2k posts in just over nine years with your 17.2k post count in less than half that time . Add to the mix is the sad realisation that you haven't got anything right in 17.2k posts of misinformed showboating. Stay warm.
  5. Well "consider" then. Let us know how that works out.
  6. No Give it a rest sad-boy, you're whistling in the wind again. As far as I am aware I haven't associated you with any "clique". As for your original point, you inferred that certain punters, either individually or as part of a group were victims of double standards, a notion that that you have failed to give any example of thus far.
  7. So you're a serial flouncer then? No worries, The Corner has many instances where punters leave for "pastures greener/take a sabbatical" only to return in an unseemly haste. In fact your two-post ode to "I'm not bitter, no really I'm not" takes many well used forum tropes - witness the 'last word' device, used more than once, only for you to immediately respond presumably to ensure you have the last word. Let's remember your repetitive "I've won" yet now apparently you cant remember what the battle was about. Finally the 'bait' trope - a derivative of "I was only joking/having a laugh", always a marker for someone who has no argument. Anyway, Welcome Back! To celebrate I've commissioned an art work to be displayed in The Corner Hall of Shame Fame - it's titled "The Return of The Prodigal Sap"
  8. Interesting that not once have you said anything to back up an utterly bonkers theory that you've maintained "made sense". Unsurprisingly, in between the foot-stomping, you instead rely on plagiarised epithets culminating in "I'm right, you're wrong - as you usually are". Ponder that whilst furiously painting 500 balusters to qualify for today's productivity bonus.
  9. Well, if that's the case there would've been no need earlier this morning for your masterclass in how not to obfuscate and deflect, would there? In any case you clearly described the notion of 'bad chemistry' from within causing you to contract the clap or covid as "hilarious" despite your year old assertion of it "making sense". Jake, I going to impart a kindness by way of some advice; when in a swamp of one's own making one should stop wriggling, otherwise you'll just sink further and further into the ordure.
  10. Conveniently you don't answer the question...but colour me incredulous, one would have thought that a person who spouts contradictory bollox would the ultimate in up-his-own-ass narcissistic slapperism to the point of having a narcissistic personality disorder, no?
  11. It was low grade sarcasm which appears to have gone straight over your head
  12. Thank you for the third-rate exercise in obfuscation and deflection. Either the "bad chemistry" theory "makes sense" or its "hilarious", so which is it? You're just another bar-room bore who spouts nonsense on the fly so you can appear erudite and insightful. Instead you tie yourself up in knots FFS.
  13. You may well find it hilarious but that's exactly the scenario that you promoted... If its any consolation, I doubt you had the attention span necessary to view the utterly bonkers theories that apparently "made sense" to you
  14. Well, its not rocket science but its a given that everyone on this site is cleverer than you. Anyway Jake, you should calm down otherwise you'll disturb the balance of your precious bodily fluids which will turn on you and give the clap or covid or something.
  15. Given your inferred hypothesis is predicated on some dodgy subjective assessments, I'm curious to know how or why MENSA is relevant.
  16. Fuck! How remarkably prescient. The sap has only done a flounce.
  17. Naturally you ignore the bleedin' obvious why certain punters seemingly occupy the LB on a permanent basis but as your employers won't allow you to operate any tools that have moving parts, one shouldn't be too surprised.
  18. You've been bellyaching about "consistency" for over a year now 'cos presumably its the only thing you think you got right. Let me now disabuse you of that notion. This stems from an incident on the 8th April 2022 where you altered a quote of mine so that its' meaning was entirely different to the message I had given. Originally I gave you a private warning (without penalty) and left it at that. As it so happens another punter spotted the quote altering and called you out on it. Because you're dumber than a bag of rocks and have a supersize gob, instead of giving a contrite 'mea culpa', or better still, saying nothing, you decided to be a smartarse barrack-room lawyer spouting specious nonsense discussing the difference between "altering" and "editing". If I had not responded this would be seen as an invitation for the puntership to play fast and loose with the rules so I had to make and example of you and upgraded the warning to a short account suspension. Obviously, despite your bogus nonchalance you're actually a brittle individual since you've been dining on my supposed lack of consistency for the past fourteen months.
  19. I appreciate you desperately want to save face but you had no case from the outset. Stop pretending otherwise.
  20. Indeed. In between your tantrums I have to say I've lost count the many times you've mentioned or inferred the illusionary "win". Suffice to say, you originally made a baseless accusation which instead of backing up your premise you've instead relied on spewing tired insults as if that was any substitute for a cohesive argument. Now, if you think that constitutes a "win" then knock yourself out. To anyone else it makes you look like a moron. As for your penultimate paragraph, I am not a cruel person so I am concerned that our scrap has affected the mental health of an emotionally weak middle-aged man-child such as for yourself. For me, its just grist to the mill.
  21. Well now you're grasping at straws and pretty thin ones at that. You see a tantrum, whether responding directly or otherwise, is still a tantrum and you've had many of those lately so stop the petulant snivelling you weak, insecure little man.
  22. Diddums. You would've been best served by leaving it after the first post but as your ego is clearly more fragile than you care to admit you nevertheless returned an hour and a half later to spew out a diatribe of mendacious bollox, ya big cry-baby.
  23. ...on account of being unemployable.
×
×
  • Create New...