Jump to content
CUNTS CORNER TWITTER ACCOUNT ID @CuntsCorner ×
Donations towards site upkeep will be thankfully received and faithfully applied....

Last Cunt Standing

Members
  • Posts

    3,219
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Last Cunt Standing

  1. 15 hours ago, King Billy said:

    Just asked if you’d seen any of it, that’s all.  I guess I should really have known you haven’t. I mean why would someone who claims to be a member of the medical profession be interested in hearing the TGA and Pfizer answer questions (or not directly answer mostly) about the actions of their government department (TGA) or in the case of Pfizer the actions of their company regarding the experimental, sorry ‘totally safe and totally effective’ mRNA therapeutic which millions of healthy people in Australia were persuaded, coerced, bullied and eventually mandated to agree to take in order to keep their job, enter a pub or shop etc. or visit a relative in hospital with the threat of arrest if they dared disobey their masters and question ‘the science’?

    I’m not going there Bill, and you can’t really expect me to. WA had some of the highest vax uptake in the world, largely because if you wanted to eat, work, travel or leave the house you needed proof of vax. Result was tiny numbers of deaths and minimal disruption. No death wall here of 170k that’s for sure. But, you’re beyond convincing now so it’s a shrug of the shoulders from me. 

  2. 1 hour ago, King Billy said:

    Have you watched any of Senators Gerard Rennick or Malcolm Roberts’ questioning of the TGA and Pfizer bosses Doc? If you haven’t they’re all on YouTube and a very interesting insight into the Australian federal and state government corruption, deception of the public and the absolute refusal of the vast majority of the political lawmakers to accept any responsibility for the massive destruction of society which they either ignorantly or far more likely knowingly inflicted for the last 3 years on the millions of people they were elected to serve, not brutalise in ways that Stalin, Hitler or Mao would have been proud of.

    Sorry Bill, but we’re good for tinfoil, thanks all the same. If you wanna knock a few other doors round here, theres a Ginger Welsh Lady up the road who’ll chat away about anything, though if she answers the door in a velvet dress with a glass of wine, run like it’s a Falls Road coded warning, there’s a good lad.  

  3. 4 hours ago, King Billy said:

    Wtf has happened to Oz Doc? Every cunt seems to have morphed into a bender, a tranny or a mentally ill leftie woketard and even the Abos are laughing at you all flapping over whether to vote for the ‘voice’. Chopper Read will  be spinning in his grave and laughing his decomposing bollocks off.

    ‘Such is life’

    I can’t speak for the whole country, Bill, but even Australia isn’t immune from the trends in Western Civilisation. Personally though, I don’t see more evidence of transgenderism or left wing bias here compared to most other places. You’ll be pleased to know the swivel-eyed right wing SovCit lunatics are just as abundant here in public as they are in other bits of the world. Day to day most people pay no attention to all the shite and are most interested in the roof over their head and the grub on the table, just as it should be.

    As for The Voice, well Sky News Australia and the Murdoch Press seem to be working themselves into a proper froth, most people couldn’t give a fuck. Referenda are, as you well recall, bitterly divisive exercises which rarely solve problems. Just like the inevitable Border Poll coming to your homeland. I hope I live long enough to see the Gardai buy all those armoured Land Rovers off the PSNI and drive them up and down the Shankill 24/7 belting out The Fields of Athenry on their PAs. 

    Kindly adjust your tinfoil. 

    • Like 1
  4. 9 hours ago, judgetwi said:

    I wish you would stop being so nice to me Captain. Yes I was quoting you sticking your Carrotcruncher oar in to something that had nothing to do with you. As usual anybody who challenges  the self appointed King of the Hill is a pisshead ( never crossed your mind I could be a junkie?) or fat or a Jew. Little boy insults from a little boy hoping he can shut me up and stop taking the piss out of this social inadequate.

    What we have here…..is a failure to communicate.

    Fuck me sideways Goldberg, I thought you were dead. Sorry, wished

    • Like 1
  5. On 03/08/2023 at 22:56, Old Chap Raasclaat said:

    August 2023, it's been pissing down for weeks and now the Bank of England have decided to piss on the homeowner folk and raise interest rates (the highest they've been since the beginning of the financial crisis). Yes, Brexit has caused instability and financial/investment uncertainty but let's not forget Liz 'downs syndrome and not worthy of' Truss and Kamikwasi Farteng helping this crisis along... (Truss is now collecting her former Prime Minister 100k a year payment). These Tory bastards are all out of ideas and talent, the icing on the cake being we now have an unelected, near Billionaire, no mandate cunt at the helm who most likely wipes his curry shitting arse with brand new £20 notes he gets from his banker mate. Cunts are pulling their own teeth out because they can't get a dentist appointment or register with an NHS one, working parents paid a pittance with some having to use food banks. Cant seem to get an appointment with your GP anymore, you have to call first thing in the morning, download, upload a load of pictures etc in the hope the GP gives you an appointment that day. Hordes of rat, scavenging boat cunts turning up, cap in hand and being put up in hotels whilst the Government have to pay poorer British people cost of living payments because all of the countries privatised utilities aren't affordable. I wonder how many will lose their homes this year due to unaffordable mortgage repayments? This is simply not good enough for a G8 country.

    We really need a change at the top, however I worry if Labour get in Sir Keir will convert to Islam and start sending ferries over to pick up the rats from Calais. All this shite going on and this Tory bastard reckons the over 50s should start delivering takeaways to make ends meet lol. 

    https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/over-50s-takeaway-drivers/

    The foreseeable future is fucking shit, the need for side incomes/hustles has never been greater... Good luck riding out this shit storm fellow cunts and cunters. Fucking hell. 

    If you’re on the skills list and under 45 I have a plan for you, OCR. Join the exodus. My recent unplanned visit to Airstrip One only fuelled my conclusion that sadly, Britain is cooked. I spent eighty quid in Waitrose on dinner for four. Seven quid a pint at Old Trafford? Fuck that. 

    • Like 1
  6. 10 hours ago, Stubby Pecker said:

    Oddly, Warner is now one the Aussies I hate the least. He knows he's a horrible little cunt and doesn't try to hide it. Smith on the other hand, is a squishy faced crybaby who's constant fidgeting around little a spasticated gibbon makes my shit hang sideways. Even when the cunt gets clean bowled he clearly thinks its not fair and would happily have it reviewed-his facial expressions after every incident prove this, the absolute polar opposite to stonefaced diggers like Steve Waugh or Boonie.  

    My read is that none of them are particularly popular down here. Sandpapergate still sticks in many throats - many times at the WACA I’ve heard lifetime bans should have been dished out by CA and a new crop blooded then. Most Aussies Cricket tragics I know, spoilt by the great team of the early 2000’s, are more than a bit embarrassed by the current squad. There’s also the suspicion they lack the grit and mongrel of Baggy Greens gone by. Smith is the prime example of such thinking. 

    Quality Tests are on hiatus now until the Indians visit. Quite who will line up to face them will be interesting. 

  7. 16 minutes ago, camberwell gypsy said:

    That's interesting LCS. Who do you reckon will be shafted after this series? Warner must be going. Apart from this innings, batting on a dead track, he's again not set things alight. Hazlewood isn't consistent and Starc's taken a bit of a hammering. So do know any new aussie blood that we should look out for? Bartlett looks a bit tasty.

    Well that’s quite the debate. Warner has already pencilled in a goodbye at the SCG in January and he’ll be given a wave through by the big wigs who feel he is owed for some reason. The bowling department looks a bit thin at Sheffield Shield level, which is why Boland is touring I guess. Cam Green obviously being pushed as the future fulcrum. I will give you one new name for the future though, I’ve seen a lot of him here in WA and if he’s not in the Baggy Green in the next few years I’ll be quite surprised. Teague Wylie. The boy can play. 

  8. 1 hour ago, camberwell gypsy said:

    Australia haven't won this series, we've lost it courtesy of Stokes playing his mates namely Anderson, Bairstow and Moheen. Bairstow lost us the first two tests and yet still retained and Anderson's past it now. Time to bring in some young guns.

    The Australian Cricket press have given this side a right mauling in the Sunday papers, pointing out quite rightly that Australia have looked lost and out of ideas since Leeds at the very most. They want Cummins dumped as Skipper, and even if they knock off 250 tomorrow, which weather permitting they might well, it’s a pretty lukewarm reception waiting for them down here. Consensus is England have played the better, shrewder cricket, and with wiser selections and better preparation (a single test against Ireland is felt to be hilarious) they should have won the series at a canter. 

    Still, the ECB have got six long months to learn lessons. No English Test Matches in August is also worthy of some reflection, imho. 

  9. 21 hours ago, Wolfie said:

    I think you'll find Frank's more fond of the semi-colon.

    On 09/06/2023 at 04:03, Last Cunt Standing said:

    I suspect he knows rather more about the colon. 

    As hinted at by m’learned colleague, I find it hard to believe this is the first time you’ve inserted a lazy semi, and failed to hit the spot. 

    No need to be embarrassed. About this, anyway. Common problem in men of your age and disposition. 

    • Like 1
  10. 17 hours ago, Wolfie said:

    It pleases me greatly that you have to repeatedly summon or name-drop the Doc in each of your responses to me; it's a though you sense an opportunity to get one over me with someone who's rekindled our long history of fueding. I'm quite sure the term "schizophrenic" has been planted to allure your newfangled partner further into hostility, rather like a coerced shark to chum. And there's nothing quite like the impact of a smiley, eye-rolling emoji to kill off an adversary, lol!

    When we first engaged on the BBC & Huw debate, on the first page of this topic, I made what is essentially a blueprint comment (about the scandal) which a trio of others agreed with and responded to. Only you and LCS have been so vehemently defensive of him – which is very much against the mill of public opinion. It's a shame you've been unable to debate like the middle-aged adult you are, instead choosing to behave on this occasion like a sploit, know-it-all little playground bullying brat. It's actually a little disappointing, because we've also had some good debates over the years. Oh, and to the bit in bold above: please feel free to shoot yourself in the foot. I am waiting.

    Like I said, it’s all incoherent and white-noisy at this point. I can’t continue to deconstruct arguments with someone clearly incapable of articulating his position beyond whatever grunting op-ed he’s read that morning. As is often the case with such base thinking, the rigidity of your output seems outmatched only by your idiocy, with the thin gruel of asserted public support as a pathetic garnish. It’s clear by now that you peaked rhetorically demanding school dinner money. I could almost feel sorry for you.  

    I am yet to see evidence of you possessing a single redeeming feature, and as I’ve got better things to do over the English Summer than trade barbs with a poor man’s Nick Ferrari, I’ll bid you good day for the moment. It’ll soon by Notting Hill Carnival time again and you can regale us all with your traditionally enlightened views on that too. I can hardly wait. 

    • Like 1
  11. I see Lady Owen of Alderley Edge has taken her seat and is merrily pocketing her expenses for life, with little to no press attention which is a story in itself. At least she’s turning up for work though, as by the look of Good Morning Britain in my hotel room just now, every other Cunt in Britain is on strike. On my way to the Cricket later I’ll be sure to drop in a bit of lobster and foie gras for my old Consultant chums manning the braziers. That is if I don’t bump into them in hospitality at Old Trafford, the cunning old foxes. 

    Country’s a fucking bin fire. 

  12. 47 minutes ago, Eddie said:

    Pics is one thing, young people working along side this man is another….

    Most young people I know are quite able at defending themselves against predatory behaviour, in fact they’ve become so good at it they tend to cite it a bit too freely these days. Unlike the Schofield affair, Huw doesn’t appear to have been leering after younger workmates, perhaps you know differently?

  13. 2 minutes ago, Eddie said:

    That’s all well and good matron, but would you want a young relative of yours working anywhere near this predatory old perv? 

    I’ve got news for you, Ed. I’ve got relatives who probably do get up to all sorts of antics I’d rather not know about. I think exchanging dick pics for thirty five grand is bloody good business if you ask me. 

  14. On 18/07/2023 at 20:05, King Billy said:

    Samantha Fox aged 16 NOT SELLING PHOTOS OF HER CUNT to The Sun and Huw Edwards as the BBC’s top newsreader who announced the death of The Queen then led the coverage of her period of national mourning and subsequent funeral, followed by the coronation of King Sausage Fingers the second, presenting himself to the licence paying public and his family as a pillar of virtue, then as soon as he thinks he’s safe from scrutiny perving it up with   whatever little fresh faced, bald bollocked teenager who’s replied to his internet trawling net. He’s a dirty little cunt who thought his status and wealth would allow him to filth it up behind the backs of his family, his employers and the public and live a lie while getting fat on the hog ad perpetuum.

    And? Your fleshpots must overflow with such people. Pillars of the community who harbour secret desires to have custard licked off them by a Ukrainian girl in a Cowboy hat. I don’t see you morally objecting when they hand over fistfuls of twenties. How many High Court Judges have you had flayed over a spanking bench? Are they incapable of doing their job because they indulge their private yet legal fantasies, Bill? I’m only asking because I’m struggling with the mental contortions required to be a moralising Puritanical Orange Lodge brothel keeper one minute, and an outraged pro-MAGA Christmas Tree magnate with an imaginary M4 and a penchant for the Royal Family the next. It’s almost like you’re making it up as you go along. 

    Oh and it’s King Sausage Fingers the Third. You lot tend to be up on Kings and Queens, no?

  15. On 18/07/2023 at 16:17, Wolfie said:

    A sense of justice, not vengeance, though if the latter accompanies it, be it so.

    It comes as little surpise a well-paid public sector worker has leapt to the defence of another (grossly) well-paid public sector worker.

    With such a verbose piece of shit as the above, which I've just about managed to get through without nodding off, what makes you the abmassador of what it is to be moral, or in Huw's case, to attempt to self-inoculate? Just listen to yourself, sympathising with the poor guy. I still call bullshit on this one, as I've already alluded to.

    You and the other snowflakes can say of Huw's behavior "it's not illegal... so it's not anyone else's business" etc. Yes – but it's still unethical. And perhaps if one is masquerading as 'Mr Consummate BBC', then you take what comes with the territory if you behave like an idiot. If you put yourself out there, in the public eye, for a £440,000 salary, as Huw chose to do (when millions in the UK stuggle to make ends meet, who pay this, so the amount is consequential), then you should expect things to come your way – whether good or bad. It comes with the BBC domain, and it works both ways. If you do something deceitful and you're on TV for half a million quid at the expense of the taxypayer, then expect people to give you a good fucking kicking if you act the cunt. It seems like anything which goes wrong nowadays with TV presenters (Schofield, Edwards) is brushed off as another "mental health" issue.

    Once the mental health card has been played, it's as though there's a line drawn no one can longer cross, and everyone has to pull back in a shower of sympathy. This is what the snowflake, Guardian-reading, lentil-farting brigade always do - and this is precisely what you and Roops (in this instance) are doing.

    I see through these cunts, Huw included. Clearly you don't. What this (alleged) Welsh pervert has done, and is doing, is wrong. Take those struggling with mental health issues on a daily basis, for example. Wouldn't they love to have the immediate access to the sort of help or treatment Huw or Phil are receiving? Why has it taken a couple of cock & arse-wrangling filthies (allegedly), both mortally embarrassed by their actions above all else, to suddenly bring people's mental health issues to the fore (because claiming this is the least damaging route for them)? What happened to their dignity? There's nothing more noble than the BBC!

    You are right, in as much as what people choose to do in their private lives is none of my business. Whatever Huw wants to spend £35k on, or whatever images he wishes to look at, is none of anyone's business. But – and this is a big but – if you're masquerading as something else (the BBC News main anchor, with a long-term wife, five kids, pet dog, the face of BBC news for 25 years, lecturing on the state of the economy, the war in Ukraine, with a gentle twist of sympathetic Welsh intonation, addressing on what according to the BBC is truth and what is not truth... ahhhhh... shut up, what bullshit! When you're clearly pretending to be something you're not, because you (allegedly) actually spend your money on looking at young men's cocks & bums, and you're grossly overpaid for doing something which has made you a household name, then expect to be challenged – especially when you've not been honest.

    Not surprisingly, you can stick your comment squarely up whichever sphincter receives it first, Doc.

    No surpise (sic) to read such a load of utter balls from our very own abmassador (sic) of wrongheadedness. It’s not even coherent. Weird objections again to how much Huw is paid, conflations with his income and personal morality, a revealing yet typically lazy attack on all public sector workers, mixed in with a bit of salacious male anatomy, then for the coup de grace, an appeal for those people “struggling with mental health” to have better access to care, while almost in the same paragraph denouncing mental health diagnoses as the all-too-convenient safe harbour for all kinds of impropriety.

    You seem most annoyed this time that Huw “deceived” the viewing public about what he gets up to privately, then later tell us that it’s none of your business what people chose to do in their private lives. Every single one of us here deceives the “public” about what we do privately, (unless of course you turn up to work bearing a t-shirt emblazoned with “you might know me as Alan from Stores, but at night I’m Wolfie, keyboard warrior and arbiter of justice”). Lastly, your fury that the collective public kicking is felt distasteful by “snowflakes” once their prey is inside a secure ward and on medication is very revealing. It’s a special kind of brave to advocate for the continued public humiliation of a man in hospital. Well done. Perhaps we can expect your next instalment, touring oncology suites and barking at the clientele for being leeches on the public purse, hiding behind an oh-so-convenient lung cancer, only there because they couldn’t resist sucking down on some B&H, some of them while in receipt of public funds, the fiends!

    This last point neatly illustrates what I have said for some time to some of the many visitors to my Corner DMs in recent months, whether they were either privately agreeing with me in our exchanges, or expressing their distaste for your conduct on the site. In response, I have tended to stress that the Corner thrives on disagreement and debate, and that when I joined the site I came for the humour and wit that used to abound. I’ve disagreed forcefully with many people here, but mostly I’ve felt like they were people I could have a good laugh with down the boozer, which to me was the vibe the place was trying to create. You however are very different gravy. There is an arrogant ugliness to your posts, a humourless and bitterly unpleasant edge which leaps from the page, and which I suspect in person I would find deeply off putting. I don’t once recall you being wrong, inferring your mind has changed or your opinion evolved, responding humorously or with subtlety. Something tells me you’ve emptied a few rooms in your time and been left wondering where everybody went. I’m sure it’s them, not you. To conclude anything else might be bad for your mental health, after all. 

    Some people just don’t do irony, do they? See ya later. 

    • Like 1
  16. 32 minutes ago, Cunty BigBollox said:

    What's the real story with you and your bunch of descendants of criminals mates that don't want to host the Commonwealth Games now?

    I’m not in Victoria, so perhaps @southerncunt might be better placed. My read is that Big Dan is in touch with the general mood of the nation. Most here could not give a Cows’ Cunt (thanks @Neil) about the Commonwealth Games, it’s a relic of a fallen Empire, and $6 billion has many better uses than kissing Charlie’s arse. It’s a matter of time before the umbilical to London is snipped anyway, so frankly, why bother? Perth’s mayor tried to suggest WA stepped in for it, and got firmly slapped down for his trouble. It’s an expensive irrelevance. Who wants it?

  17. 1 minute ago, Decimus said:

    I think the Lib Dems will probably do better than Labour in these upcoming by-elections. Let's hope that they don't replicate it at the General, we all know what happened the last time those quisling bastards got a whiff of power.

    Amen. Nick Clegg in particular should be tied to two Utes which are driven fast in opposite directions. I can live with a little bit of tactical voting mind, whatever it takes to turn the Tories in on themselves, which by all accounts is already well underway. There’s a nasty rumour that Jonny Mercer is sniffing round BAE Systems here in WA wanting a job on the AUKUS sub deal. Hardly a vote of confidence in their chances, is it? He’ll go down like a cup of cold sick over here. 

  18. I’m currently sat in the Qantas lounge at Perth airport, watching the rain fall as I wait for QF9 to ferry me back to Blighty. Funeral for an old friend, and perhaps a little trip to Old Trafford if the weather holds this week (anyone in the vicinity have a forecast?). I’ll be in the UK on Thursday when the by-elections come in. If it isn’t the beginnings of a major political earthquake, then I wish you all good fucking luck. 

    9 hours ago, The Beast said:

    He will win, that's a given. The  massacre will make 1997 seem tame.

    The only way to get rid of this duopoly is to take one half of it out.

    The tories need to be hounded out, right down to the last parish councillor. Extinct. They deserve nothing less.

    Only then can some credible opposition start to form.

    17 hours ago, Decimus said:

    He's an absolute fucking cunt is what he is. His recent interview with Kuennsberg amounted to him basically admitting that Labour has absolutely no plans or policy other than not being the Conservatives.

    He'll probably get in by default, but if he spends his subsequent five years in office moaning that his hands are tied because of the Tories, Labour will then spend another 15 years out of power at least.

×
×
  • Create New...