Eddie

10 minutes ago, Decimus said:

 if you were referring to the minimum wage young waitresses he visually rapes over the rims of his Pollard's whilst dining alone, I'd say it's a definite yes.

You spelt waiter wrongly…

9 minutes ago, Frank said:

Get off twitter, Ed, you fucking idiot. 

Have you ever sent texts to younger members of staff? 

53 minutes ago, Last Cunt Standing said:

Most young people I know are quite able at defending themselves against predatory behaviour, in fact they’ve become so good at it they tend to cite it a bit too freely these days. Unlike the Schofield affair, Huw doesn’t appear to have been leering after younger workmates, perhaps you know differently?

Complaints have been received by younger employees of the BBC of inappropriate texts. He clearly used his status at the BBC to impress young people outside the organisation, taking selfies at work as part of his grooming modus operandi. Young people working at the BBC, I would imagine have an extra pressure of keep quiet if you value your job, hence only recently coming forward. 

19 minutes ago, Last Cunt Standing said:

I’ve got news for you, Ed. I’ve got relatives who probably do get up to all sorts of antics I’d rather not know about. I think exchanging dick pics for thirty five grand is bloody good business if you ask me. 

Pics is one thing, young people working along side this man is another….

37 minutes ago, Last Cunt Standing said:

No surpise (sic) to read such a load of utter balls from our very own abmassador (sic) of wrongheadedness. It’s not even coherent. Weird objections again to how much Huw is paid, conflations with his income and personal morality, a revealing yet typically lazy attack on all public sector workers, mixed in with a bit of salacious male anatomy, then for the coup de grace, an appeal for those people “struggling with mental health” to have better access to care, while almost in the same paragraph denouncing mental health diagnoses as the all-too-convenient safe harbour for all kinds of impropriety.

You seem most annoyed this time that Huw “deceived” the viewing public about what he gets up to privately, then later tell us that it’s none of your business what people chose to do in their private lives. Every single one of us here deceives the “public” about what we do privately, (unless of course you turn up to work bearing a t-shirt emblazoned with “you might know me as Alan from Stores, but at night I’m Wolfie, keyboard warrior and arbiter of justice”). Lastly, your fury that the collective public kicking is felt distasteful by “snowflakes” once their prey is inside a secure ward and on medication is very revealing. It’s a special kind of brave to advocate for the continued public humiliation of a man in hospital. Well done. Perhaps we can expect your next instalment, touring oncology suites and barking at the clientele for being leeches on the public purse, hiding behind an oh-so-convenient lung cancer, only there because they couldn’t resist sucking down on some B&H, some of them while in receipt of public funds, the fiends!

This last point neatly illustrates what I have said for some time to some of the many visitors to my Corner DMs in recent months, whether they were either privately agreeing with me in our exchanges, or expressing their distaste for your conduct on the site. In response, I have tended to stress that the Corner thrives on disagreement and debate, and that when I joined the site I came for the humour and wit that used to abound. I’ve disagreed forcefully with many people here, but mostly I’ve felt like they were people I could have a good laugh with down the boozer, which to me was the vibe the place was trying to create. You however are very different gravy. There is an arrogant ugliness to your posts, a humourless and bitterly unpleasant edge which leaps from the page, and which I suspect in person I would find deeply off putting. I don’t once recall you being wrong, inferring your mind has changed or your opinion evolved, responding humorously or with subtlety. Something tells me you’ve emptied a few rooms in your time and been left wondering where everybody went. I’m sure it’s them, not you. To conclude anything else might be bad for your mental health, after all. 

Some people just don’t do irony, do they? See ya later. 

That’s all well and good matron, but would you want a young relative of yours working anywhere near this predatory old perv? 

1 hour ago, Neil said:

Honestly....none, but if I was shit rich and emotionally detached I would buy the dirtiest fucking bitch(es) out there.

And then kill them I hope 🤞 

3 hours ago, Neil said:

 

Wealthy man pays for sexual services........hardly something new is it? I really couldn't give a cows cunt

Neil, how many times have you paid a professional?

2 minutes ago, Eric Cuntman said:

Good one.

I posted a pic of a naked bbc news reader that frank had sent me. No one needed to see that 

8 minutes ago, Cunty BigBollox said:

It looks as if the fist has been up the wrong 'un already, it's all brown, yuk

4 minutes ago, Witheredscrote said:

@Eddie, may I humbly apologise for doubting you. If you want me to suck your cock.......

No thank you, give Frank a nudge.

6 minutes ago, Witheredscrote said:

No doubt your ex itv mate now works for the Sun, and heard it from a man in a pub. I suppose it's got to be true then.

You stupid gullible cunt.

Shut your mouth you bankrupt old poof, some of us have mates, and Frank told him, they are on the same dating site…

2 minutes ago, Eric Cuntman said:

This cunt isn’t going to remain anonymous or get away with anything now that a second and third victim have entered the game. 
 What remains to be seen is how many of their former colleagues at the BBC are they going to drop a dime on in order to soften their own punishment. 💣💣💥

I was told by an ex itv mate that it was him on Saturday, I posted his name here but my post was removed and rightly so. The same itv guy has said presenter x is in loads of trouble so more to come out about this deviant 

4 minutes ago, King Billy said:

It’s amazing how every time one of these nonces is uncovered they’re defended by leftie liberal talking heads on TV who want to talk about the privacy and human rights of the culprit, their wife and their kids, rather than what a vile disgusting deviant pervert they’ve shown themself to be?

Until he broke covid rules, now he’s finished….

20 minutes ago, King Billy said:

It just gets better and better this story as it’s just being reported that Presenter X broke lockdown rules in 2020 to meet a third young person  he met on a dating site. Lol lol lol.

The degenerate old queen loves Edward greeeeen  

2 hours ago, Neil said:

The good old days eh? 16, massive jugs and able to get them out for the lads. Fire up the Quattro

You disgust me.

5 minutes ago, Decimus said:

Thankfully most normal people still abhor the sexual abuse of children, so I suspect and hope that you're correct. 

However, as for the upper echelons of Aunty, plus a select group of middle class wokies who endorse every sexual deviancy under the sun, they're already coming out and defending the beast with such comments as "It was consensual", "17 is not a child."

I wonder if the liberal Hooray Henrys would still be waving their P.I.E. flags so fervently if it was their 17 year old "man" or "woman" (not child, remember) who was groomed and bribed into getting their genitalia out for the gratification of a millionaire pervert five decades older than them?

If this cunt isn't going to get locked up for committing a crime, and some thick cunts are actually that dense that they believe no law has been broken, then he at least needs to be exposed for what he is.

Cue @Carl Sway and @Zev popping along to defend this sick cunt's antics.

It’s amazing that the sun is championing this story, despite paying and publishing topless photos of a sixteen year old child (Sam fox) 

1 hour ago, Witheredscrote said:

Why are you like this @Eddie Learn to live with your mistakes.

I need to take a long hard look at myself withers, I just don’t know who I am anymore. Fuck off. 

16 minutes ago, Witheredscrote said:

Exactly right.  My binman regularly leaves me a note 'Ne pas jeter la merde d'oie dans la poubelle'  Perfect grammar, and he isn't covered in tats. Quite frankly, I wouldn't let Snowy near my bin.

You live in a bin, disgusting French worm. 

11 hours ago, Decimus said:

Post Removed

Let’s face it, he doesn’t have a history of telling the truth, his ex wife and the tax man will confirm. 

10 minutes ago, Penny Farthing said:

Would you let her suck your toes?

She definitely wouldn’t want to, have you seen the crocs? 

14 minutes ago, Eric Cuntman said:

You should be nice to him. If he really is Prince Andrew, he might be able to hook you up with his ex. The posh freckled ginge.

You know I love a ginger Eric, but even I draw the line at her red hairy legs 🦵 

1 minute ago, peglegtwo said:

Yes, will do it here & now.

 

Am really prince Andrew .Anyone have any underage girls interested in having a good time ?

Reported. 

Who’s the nonce paying teenage boys for photos? I really hope it’s Jeremy vine…

18 minutes ago, Eric Cuntman said:

You should find every speed camera for a 200 mile radius, programme all the locations in to your sat-nav, and borrow fatty’s car for the day. Where is the jug eared cavalier? Banned again?

Fatty is dead, or a least I hope he is. 

20 minutes ago, Mike Hunt said:

I've been caught by one of those, but they're not legally enforceable.  Shitting meself I was for 10 days, waiting for the NIP and the prospect of an 8 hour waste of time in a classroom lectured by a patronising twat who seriously believes going 35 in 30 area will kill but 34 won't, and then all I got was a police-letterheaded warning.  "GREAT NEWS!".

Every time I see those cunts I put the pedal to the metal. The record so far is a letter advising I was doing 54 in a 30, well I wasn’t until I spotted them.