Decimus

If you've got that much of a problem with Mrs N's growler you shouldn't have married her.

Shut the fuck up, you grape-stamping, Camembert-stinking, dirty frog slag. Wogs begin at Calais.

I genuinely feel enraged whenever this gargantuan fat cunt appears on my 50 inch screen, blocking out every other televisual point of reference whilst guffawing like a fucking idiot. Whilst I could possibly tolerate her existence as long as it was kept to ITV and Channel 4, it now appears that the porky fucking slag is popping up in every news thread I open, whingeing about "trolls" and "body shamers" who question whether her social media pictures are photoshopped. Of course she denies that they are, as she just looks "different" on the telly as opposed to real life. Unless the camera now adds ten stone and not ten pounds, this disgusting fucking pig is lying. These pictures were taken two days apart, and based upon the evidence I hereby declare that she should be stripped naked and flogged through the streets of Newcastle, her disgusting quivering, jiggling flesh exposed to ridicule with each stroke of the lash.

They even had a black and a chink in it.

French cuisine is bizarelly given a sort of semi-deified status in the culinary world. When it comes down to it, I can't see the appeal of eating scabby old horses, shit-filtering snails, slimy fucking frogs and the livers of sexually abused geese. Give me good old fashioned British roast beef any day of the week. In fact, I'd rather eat anything else than the shit that they serve up. French food inevitably congeals on a plate whilst swimming in oil, blood and garlic.

All joking Assad, this shit is getting Syrias.

For the record, it's a woman, and even more of a cunt than the rest of its gender. I'd thankfully never heard of it before until the article below caught my eye. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/apr/12/zuckerberg-age-youth-revelation-media-response?espv=1 Everybody knows that The Guardian is the liberal conscience of the nation, highlighting issues surrounding racism and sexism and quite rightly exposing them to criticism. Oh, unless that racism and sexism is directed towards a white male, that's not only acceptable, but is becoming a daily occurrence in this disgusting fucking rag. The article above might be considered tongue-in-cheek by some, but the underlying misandry and hatred towards white people is pretty clear for all to see. Not only is discrimination towards white males condoned, but the way that The Guardian embraces it with pithy shite like this is almost gleeful in nature. I won't be reading it again until its chief editor has been exorcised of the spirit of Valerie fucking Solanas. Mahdawi, and The Guardian, can fuck right off and suck my privileged, white dick.

At least Manky has been demobbed. Imagine our last line of defence being a fat, ginger northern tosser straddling a BMX on the white cliffs of Dover, furiously waving a potato peeler at a rapidly spreading mushroom cloud whilst belching God Save The Queen.

Indeed. Regardless of any supposed technological advantage we may or may not have over the Russian's, the fact remains that we would be vastly outgunned in any potential conflict. I'd rather have one million stones in my arsenal than one single bullet. http://armedforces.eu/compare/country_Russia_vs_United_Kingdom The bellicose delusions of some people on here beggars belief.

I've trawled over the list several times, and I can't see the cunt. Of course I might have his name completely wrong, but I was 99% sure that I knew what it was. Then again I'm half cut and can't take my enraged, Jew hating eyes off of Alan Yentob.

"I agree with @Mrs Roops comments regarding the scope of any military strikes on Syria to give them a warning that this shite isn't acceptable and to destroy their capability of doing it." That sounds awfully like you're condoning military action to me, even on a limited scale. Explain yourself, you worm.

"I agree with @Mrs Roops comments regarding the scope of any military strikes on Syria to give them a warning that this shite isn't acceptable and to destroy their capability of doing it." That sounds awfully like you're condoning military action to me, even on a limited scale. Explain yourself, you worm.

It doesn't matter how much our military technology is ahead of Russia's in terms of sophistication. The fact remains that any confrontation with them that escalates into an armed conflict would involve our complete annihilation. Of course we are part of NATO and America would not stand on the sidelines, but should he so choose, Putin could destroy all life in the UK by the end of today with a push of a button. No matter how miniscule the risk, the situation in Syria does not warrant poking that mad cunt with a stick. I'm also not comfortable with Britain following the lead of another dangerous maniac who is using a genuine humanitarian crisis to deflect from domestic accusations of being far too cosy with Putin. If you believe that an intervention would have anything to do with helping the poor fuckers who have been attacked then you are seriously deluded, Stubby. Wake up, even you're not this dense.

The use of chemical weapons should not be tolerated, but there is a difference in dealing with chemical attacks on domestic soil and those carried out in a foreign country. I think that the message since the Salisbury attack is quite clear, that as a country we are willing to impose sanctions and deal with the threat in a robust nature. What I don't see the need for is to potentially risk a military conflict with a dominant nuclear power over the use of chemical weapons in another country, especially when the political situation in Syria isn't as cut and dry as Assad equals bad, rebels equals good. It's a domestic affair regardless of international law, which let's not forget the west has broken when it has suited its own interests, and it should be left to play out as one. If Russia wishes to involve itself then that is their decision, but there are absolutely no benefits for the UK in getting involved. Taking a tough stance over Syria and playing a game of international brinkmanship with Putin isn't the same as standing up to Russian ambitions when the impact is directly felt by ourselves or our allies in NATO. Direct involvement simply isn't worth the risks involved, and the time and place to confront Russia isn't now and it's certainly not in Syria.

I'm all in favour for adopting a tough stance with Russia when they perpetrate an attack on British soil that puts our citizens in danger. What I'm not willing to accept is taking military action against Syria, it's not our place or responsibility. As previously stated, I acknowledge the Assad regime as being despotic and brutal, but when has attempting to play the world's policeman in the post-imperial era ever benefited the countries whose affairs we have meddled in? As for Russian military hardware, it might be inferior in quality, but in terms of size it dwarfs the UK's output. The American's might be able to go toe-to-toe with Russia, but with a nuclear arsenal that makes our own look like the amateur collection of a child, I don't believe we should antagonise them when it's avoidable.

Spotto, you're like a doddering old uncle who has been put to bed at a family party. The sort of decrepit cunt who wakes up during the middle of an amusing anecdote, stinking of piss and cock flapping aimlessly about, whilst the rest of the family secretly hope that they'll slip on their own faeces and break their neck.

The only red button May has access to is on her Sky remote. We can't fart without America giving their blessing.

About 2000 miles behind, waving a white flag and doing your best Possum impressions. Dirty French cunts.

Theresa May has called an emergency cabinet meeting in order to discuss the UK joining the USA and France in military action against the Assad regime in Syria. Rumour has it she is looking to bypass parliament in order to not upset Trump by possibly risking a no vote. Regardless of the fact that the UK military consists of little more than a naval rubber duck and some aged Tornado jets that are about as much use as a squadron of Sopwith Camels, she is risking becoming embroiled in a potential military confrontation with Russia. And for what? A barbaric load of Arabs have killed another slightly less barbaric load of Arabs, in a country thousands of miles away. It's got fuck all to do with us, and if Trump wants to posture with his dick out then we shouldn't be metaphorically hiding behind his skirts whilst chucking the military equivalent of a couple of rocks. The last thing this country needs is to become embroiled in yet another Middle Eastern debacle, with the added potential of having the Russians pull our pants down to tan our post-imperial, irrelevant arse. The haggard Thatcher-lite old cunt May should leave international military posturing to countries actually capable of doing it and concentrate on sorting out the fucking shambles of exiting the EU that she is presiding over. Fucking deluded, blue-rinsed cunt.

The only things he'd be leaving with are gonorrhea and a sore arsehole, you twisted queer cunt.

Fuck this pernickety shit , what are your thoughts regarding the remnants of Dicky's Lalique collection?

Two roads walk into a pub. The barman asks the first one what he wants to drink, he answers "Piss and cum out of your fucking decapitated skull." The barman asks the second road what the first one's problem is. "Don't mind him," he says "he can't help it, he's a cycle path." Fuck off.

Proper, you fucking cunt.