Guest Quincy Cockfingers Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 3 hours ago, judgetwi said: You seem to like saying disgusting things about other peoples' parents. I wonder why. Judge, this isn't fair- it is very likely his missus's parents are a pair of utter fucking idiots, and ugly bastards to boot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 9 hours ago, Rick_B said: You haven't provided a link to the news article, but in my opinion it's bollox. There's no way the body can"interpret it as sugar". In any case the expression "diabetic coma" is ambiguous. In theory very high blood sugar levels could lead to unconsciousness, but the vast majority of diabetics becoming unconscious are those on medication or especially insulin who have developed very low blood glucose, a condition called hypoglycaemia. The story was that the taste of sugar in your mouth triggers the production of insulin to counteract the sugar which subsequently doesn't arrive. It was a headline story on the bbc a few months ago, if I can find a link I'll post it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decimus Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 15 minutes ago, scotty said: The story was that the taste of sugar in your mouth triggers the production of insulin to counteract the sugar which subsequently doesn't arrive. It was a headline story on the bbc a few months ago, if I can find a link I'll post it. I've heard this as well, Scotters, possibly the same article. In the interest of providing RickB with an educational biological treat, how about providing the cunt with a link to an alternative "BBC" site. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubba C Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 How could an artificial sweetener trick the body into producing insulin? Especially in diabetics, who can't produce insulin? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southerncunt Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 21 hours ago, Gurt said: A bit like licking your sisters fanny then- it tastes the same, but it's not right It doesn't taste the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gurt Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 11 minutes ago, southerncunt said: It doesn't taste the same. Yes, once you get past the shredded wheat pubes it's like lapping at the contents of a fish pie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Quincy Cockfingers Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 2 minutes ago, Gurt said: Yes, once you get past the shredded wheat pubes it's like lapping at the contents of a fish pie A pair of experts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 2 hours ago, Decimus said: I've heard this as well, Scotters, possibly the same article. In the interest of providing RickB with an educational biological treat, how about providing the cunt with a link to an alternative "BBC" site. I put a joke on sicki about exactly that decs. About using the wifes computer and wondering why all her search history involved "bbc near you" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 2 hours ago, Bubbles said: How could an artificial sweetener trick the body into producing insulin? Especially in diabetics, who can't produce insulin? "you're overweight or diabetic. Research has repeatedly shown that artificially sweetened no- or low-calorie drinks and other "diet" foods tend to stimulate your appetite, increase cravings for carbs, stimulate fat storage and weight gain, and promote insulin resistance and diabetes. There are a number of different reasons for this. First of all, artificial sweeteners basically trick your body into thinking that it's going to receive sugar (calories), but when the sugar doesn't arrive, your body signals that it needs more, which results in carb cravings. This connection between sweet taste and increased hunger can be found in the medical literature going back at least two decades (see list of selected studies below). But artificial sweeteners also produce a variety of metabolic dysfunctions that promote weight gain" http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/10/01/artificial-sweeteners-raise-diabetes-risk.aspx That's basically what the bbc article said, bubbles. It was quite recent, iirc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubba C Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 If any research had proven sweeteners to be detrimental to health, it would've been on the front of the Daily Mail into time. Mercola saying the fact hasn't gained much media traction is complete shit. Mercola is a quack, Scotty, sorry mate, it's utter shit, please trust me on this. I was going to do a nom a while back about health-scares and new-cures etc., but I couldn't be bothered at the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Roops Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 1 hour ago, Bubbles said: Mercola is a quack, Scotty, sorry mate, it's utter shit, please trust me on this. Its a master class in cherry-picking! One of the scientific "surveys" had seven healthy people under assessment which is so low to be meaningless. What about testing "unhealthy" people together with a control group fed placebos? The final giveaway clue is that Mercola suggests a "healthy" alternative which by curious coincidence is sold by the good doctor himself. Dr Mercola is a dangerous man, for more details click here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubba C Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 1 minute ago, Mrs Roops said: Its a master class in cherry-picking! It's fucking shit, is what it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 40 minutes ago, Bubbles said: If any research had proven sweeteners to be detrimental to health, it would've been on the front of the Daily Mail into time. Mercola saying the fact hasn't gained much media traction is complete shit. Mercola is a quack, Scotty, sorry mate, it's utter shit, please trust me on this. I was going to do a nom a while back about health-scares and new-cures etc., but I couldn't be bothered at the time. I have no idea what mercola is or what they do, but in general I trust the bbc unless they're policing kiddy fiddling amongst their resident dj's. That's the first link I found. It makes sense to me; the concept of your tastebuds being the first thing your body reacts to seems plausible. That's why I mentioned it apropos alcohol free lager. The artificial sweetener thing was reported by another news agency and relayed by the bbc, so I tend to give it more credence than a random internet report. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Roops Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 Just now, scotty said: I have no idea what mercola is or what they do, but in general I trust the bbc unless they're policing kiddy fiddling amongst their resident dj's. That's the first link I found. It makes sense to me; the concept of your tastebuds being the first thing your body reacts to seems plausible. That's why I mentioned it apropos alcohol free lager. The artificial sweetener thing was reported by another news agency and relayed by the bbc, so I tend to give it more credence than a random internet report. Its very plausible. Its lazy journalism by the BBC, makes you wonder where all the licence fees go to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Quincy Cockfingers Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 1 hour ago, Bubbles said: If any research had proven sweeteners to be detrimental to health, it would've been on the front of the Daily Mail into time. Mercola saying the fact hasn't gained much media traction is complete shit. Mercola is a quack, Scotty, sorry mate, it's utter shit, please trust me on this. I was going to do a nom a while back about health-scares and new-cures etc., but I couldn't be bothered at the time. Who are you cunts, dieticians? It's great that one can get any expert opinion on anything under the sun on CuntsCorner, the go-to hub for specialist expert witness type outsourcing. I know just as fuck all as any cunt, but it was my understanding that it was the saliva/digestion response was the mechanism by which sweetness as an olfactory sensation altered blood sugar and a bunch of other shite. First this, Rather than the chemical reaction. No doubt some genius can correct me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotty Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 19 minutes ago, Quincy Cockfingers said: Who are you cunts, dieticians? It's great that one can get any expert opinion on anything under the sun on CuntsCorner, the go-to hub for specialist expert witness type outsourcing. I know just as fuck all as any cunt, but it was my understanding that it was the saliva/digestion response was the mechanism by which sweetness as an olfactory sensation altered blood sugar and a bunch of other shite. First this, Rather than the chemical reaction. No doubt some genius can correct me? Well, that's kind of how I saw it quincey. I don't claim any medical expertise, but what you've suggested strikes me as plausible. If pavlov could get his rottweilers to salivate at the sight of food or the sound of a fucking bell, that's a physiological reaction to a sensory input. I don't see why our bodies wouldn't react in a similar way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Quincy Cockfingers Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 23 minutes ago, scotty said: Well, that's kind of how I saw it quincey. I don't claim any medical expertise, but what you've suggested strikes me as plausible. If pavlov could get his rottweilers to salivate at the sight of food or the sound of a fucking bell, that's a physiological reaction to a sensory input. I don't see why our bodies wouldn't react in a similar way. Yeah I'm sure it's taste-salivate-gut starts up in anticipation of a doughnut, or in bills case, a big spunk dump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DingTheRioja Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 16 hours ago, Rick_B said: You haven't provided a link to the news article, but in my opinion it's bollox. There's no way the body can"interpret it as sugar". In any case the expression "diabetic coma" is ambiguous. In theory very high blood sugar levels could lead to unconsciousness, but the vast majority of diabetics becoming unconscious are those on medication or especially insulin who have developed very low blood glucose, a condition called hypoglycaemia. So that's where Decs got his abuse idea from on the Pelatons thread... 3 hours ago, Bubbles said: Mercola is a quack, Scotty, sorry mate, it's utter shit, please trust me on this. Does he do any Sports related consulting? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubba C Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 14 minutes ago, DingTheRioja said: So that's where Decs got his abuse idea from on the Pelatons thread... Does he do any Sports related consulting? Fuck right off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DingTheRioja Posted April 5, 2016 Report Share Posted April 5, 2016 2 minutes ago, Bubbles said: Fuck right off. Not really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.