Ape™️ Posted July 3, 2017 Report Share Posted July 3, 2017 Just now, DingTheRioja said: *whoosh* Right over your head. Again. Are you trying to imply that I've somehow missed some subtlety of what you're saying, and that you aren't making a complete cunt of yourself? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubba C Posted July 3, 2017 Report Share Posted July 3, 2017 11 minutes ago, DingTheRioja said: *whoosh* Right over your head. Again. Fucking shut up, ding. Idiot. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bill Stickers Posted July 3, 2017 Report Share Posted July 3, 2017 Come on Ding, come up with some fabricated bollocks about this Ethics Committee. We're all waiting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DingTheRioja Posted July 3, 2017 Report Share Posted July 3, 2017 37 minutes ago, Bill Stickers said: Come on Ding, come up with some fabricated bollocks about this Ethics Committee. We're all waiting. Did someone squeak? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DingTheRioja Posted July 3, 2017 Report Share Posted July 3, 2017 2 hours ago, Mrs Roops said: ...not too clear where an insurance advert comes into this Ding. As for the nonsense about my "attempt to get [you] to divulge personally identifiable information", you volunteered that you had worked with an ethics committee. I merely asked under what capacity. Since there are currently 104 such committees licenced to oversee medical research by the United Kingdom Ethics Committee Authority and that this is in addition to countless other hospital, university and commercial interest ethics committees I suspect you are simply laying on more BS. Fuck me, you are thick aren't you? Memory like a sand fly.... Oh, and no, of course you are not searching for shit on me, 104 you say? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Roops Posted July 3, 2017 Report Share Posted July 3, 2017 1 hour ago, DingTheRioja said: Fuck me, you are thick aren't you? Memory like a sand fly.... Oh, and no, of course you are not searching for shit on me, 104 you say? This is simply a long-winded version of "whoosh". We can all read the discourse. You're all front and bullshit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bill Stickers Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 7 hours ago, DingTheRioja said: Did someone squeak? *whoosh* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DingTheRioja Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 7 hours ago, Mrs Roops said: This is simply a long-winded version of "whoosh". We can all read the discourse. You're all front and bullshit. Yes we can all read the discourse. You tried to accuse me of saying the poor kid should be kept alive for research purposes, I told you that you're wrong, and now you've gone off on a tangent about ethics committees because you're never wrong, you can't simply shut the fuck up. 104 you say? http://www.eurecnet.org/information/uk.html Quote as of April, 2012 Oh, and the only shit you can smell is yours, take your head out of your arse and the smell will diminish. Maybe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ape™️ Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 10 minutes ago, DingTheRioja said: Yes we can all read the discourse. You tried to accuse me of saying the poor kid should be kept alive for research purposes, I told you that you're wrong, and now you've gone off on a tangent about ethics committees because you're never wrong, you can't simply shut the fuck up. 104 you say? http://www.eurecnet.org/information/uk.html Oh, and the only shit you can smell is yours, take your head out of your arse and the smell will diminish. Maybe. *whoosh* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lady Penelope Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 EUREC .. Your Wreck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lady Penelope Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 1 minute ago, Ape said: *whoosh* Down or Up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DingTheRioja Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 31 minutes ago, The Lady Penelope said: EUREC .. Your Wreck. Have you read what that organisation is? It's an "association" of ethics committees, one that the committees can apply to, it is not an official body, it does not represent ethics committtees in any official capacity, merely a group of individuals who got EU funding for a pet project. Try looking at the official government website regarding ethics committees... http://www.hra.nhs.uk/news/rec/ 9 pages, 10 per page, but less than 10 on the last page.. Can you count? Fucking simpletons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubba C Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 1 hour ago, DingTheRioja said: Yes we can all read the discourse. You tried to accuse me of saying the poor kid should be kept alive for research purposes, I told you that you're wrong, and now you've gone off on a tangent about ethics committees because you're never wrong, you can't simply shut the fuck up. 104 you say? http://www.eurecnet.org/information/uk.html Oh, and the only shit you can smell is yours, take your head out of your arse and the smell will diminish. Maybe. Wheesht. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadkill Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 1 minute ago, Bubba C said: Wheesht. Who the fuck is that cunt in your avatar? I've never seen him in a Trailer Park Boys episode... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubba C Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 1 minute ago, Roadkill said: Who the fuck is that cunt in your avatar? I've never seen him in a Trailer Park Boys episode... Barry Sheck, OJ's lawyer and co-founder of the Innocence Project. Shit hawks are circling, roady, shit hawks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadkill Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 7 minutes ago, Bubba C said: Barry Sheck, OJ's lawyer and co-founder of the Innocence Project. Shit hawks are circling, roady, shit hawks. Shit clock's ticking, Bubs... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Roops Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 I'll come to your little temper tantrum in another post but in the meantime, 25 minutes ago, DingTheRioja said: Have you read what that organisation is? It's an "association" of ethics committees, one that the committees can apply to, it is not an official body, it does not represent ethics committtees in any official capacity, merely a group of individuals who got EU funding for a pet project. Try looking at the official government website regarding ethics committees... http://www.hra.nhs.uk/news/rec/ 9 pages, 10 per page, but less than 10 on the last page.. Can you count? Fucking simpletons. Yeah, that refers to REC's set up by the NHS, Ding. The 2014 Care Act, s708 ss6, requires the Health Research Authority to ensure individual NHS REC's policy documents do not conflict with The Clinical Trials Regulations which is regulated by the UKECA a statutory body under control of the four ministers from each of the countries that make up the UK. That's actually in line with the second para of your first link. Did you read it? "Fucking simpletons" indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lady Penelope Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 What interests me is here that so many of the members here who support keeping Charley alive regardless are same ones who are using insults like "mong", and "spack" and generally inferring that people who have cerebral palsy or downs syndrome (conditions in which people can have purposeful and happy lives) should be put down or at best treated as not human, yet here in a case where there is clearly no hope of him ever having any form of brain function or being more than in a non-responsive vegetive state you are all pouring with angst and desperate for him to be given a non-existent chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadkill Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 10 minutes ago, The Lady Penelope said: What interests me is here that so many of the members here who support keeping Charley alive regardless are same ones who are using insults like "mong", and "spack" and generally inferring that people who have cerebral palsy or downs syndrome (conditions in which people can have purposeful and happy lives) should be put down or at best treated as not human, yet here in a case where there is clearly no hope of him ever having any form of brain function or being more than in a non-responsive vegetive state you are all pouring with angst and desperate for him to be given a non-existent chance. I counter your argument with this: You are old, and you only want him to die because you want to take as many people as possible with you into the abyss. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Roops Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 1 hour ago, DingTheRioja said: Yes we can all read the discourse. You tried to accuse me of saying the poor kid should be kept alive for research purposes, I told you that you're wrong, and now you've gone off on a tangent about ethics committees because you're never wrong, you can't simply shut the fuck up. 104 you say? http://www.eurecnet.org/information/uk.html Oh, and the only shit you can smell is yours, take your head out of your arse and the smell will diminish. Maybe. If you're going to go postal over splitting hairs Ding, I actually intimated that I was being generous in my original assertion that your argument borders on advocating that the youngster be kept alive purely for the purposes of medical research. As an aside I mentioned that you piqued my interest when you said that you had worked with ethics committees. I enquired as to under what capacity this was. This could have been as a committee member (over the years this number would be well into the tens of thousands), or as a third party commissioned to submit an independent report (including myself, again one of many, many thousands) or as a part of a group making a submission due to having an interest in a particular issue (again, many thousands) or, as someone cruelly suggested, as the janitor. Cue (possibly manufactured) outrage rabbiting on about soliciting personal identifying data. As I said you're full of BS who shouts "whoosh" when you're unable to articulate a counter argument. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Witheredscrote Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 13 hours ago, Bubba C said: Fucking shut up, ding. Idiot. Not a peep from you for 21 days, and then you pop up with the same old shit. I hate you Bibble, Ding hates you, and Snatch has dismissed you. Still I see you have got a 'like' from the Aviator, so that's nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DingTheRioja Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 2 hours ago, Mrs Roops said: I'll come to your little temper tantrum in another post but in the meantime, Yeah, that refers to REC's set up by the NHS, Ding. The 2014 Care Act, s708 ss6, requires the Health Research Authority to ensure individual NHS REC's policy documents do not conflict with The Clinical Trials Regulations which is regulated by the UKECA a statutory body under control of the four ministers from each of the countries that make up the UK. That's actually in line with the second para of your first link. Did you read it? "Fucking simpletons" indeed. I shall repeat... You say 104? Also, please explain where is this "licence" from? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuntybaws Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 12 minutes ago, DingTheRioja said: I shall repeat... You say 104? Also, please explain where is this "licence" from? Ding, Ding, Ding, you're getting totally pwned here. Best to simply accept the bitch-slapping and slink away. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Lady Penelope Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 5 minutes ago, Cuntybaws said: Ding, Ding, Ding, you're getting totally pwned here. Best to simply accept the bitch-slapping and slink away. It is time that Ding returned to the town of his Scottish ancestors and took refuge behind the Dingwall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuntybaws Posted July 4, 2017 Report Share Posted July 4, 2017 1 minute ago, The Lady Penelope said: It is time that Ding returned to the town of his Scottish ancestors and took refuge behind the Dingwall. He who flounces and slinks away, lives to multi-quote another day. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.