Jump to content
CUNTS CORNER TWITTER ACCOUNT ID @CuntsCorner ×
Donations towards site upkeep will be thankfully received and faithfully applied....

Manchester terrorist bombing


Guest Alfie Noakes

Recommended Posts

Guest 'eavensabove
2 hours ago, Panzerknacker said:

She's a very smart and wealthy woman who knows how to maximise her limited abilities. ..I'd give her a lenght only if there was no talking though 

Panzerknacker 

I'd give her one too, around the back. Of her head with a baseball bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 'eavensabove
7 hours ago, Stubby Pecker said:

Too true baws, I'd happily lock up all the cunts on watch lists and former persons of interest and any cunt who remotely sympathises with ISIS twats, and lock them up for good, preferably in Wales. However, as you said it didn't work in guant so won't work here and the lawyers will see the pound signs on their eyelids when they go to bed. The only solution I can think of is giving them a separate country- build one in the Irish Sea like what they did with the palm thing in Dubai. Then if it goes tits up we can send in Snake Pliskin on a hand glider and a terminal disease 

Bravo and here here. Dump the cunts on the rock of Gibraltar, and let the macaques sort them out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Spanky

This debate has been raging for some time now and the views expressed on this thread, whether knee-jerk and emotional, or more considered, are not new. It is important to not ignore any of them as this is a snapshot of how people are feeling and where this and many other countries could be going if something constructive is not done.

The "true solution" would be to go back in time many, many years and for everyone not to do all of the things that has led us to this point in the first place, whether that is European colonialism, destabilising or invading sovereign countries such as Libya or Iraq, or simply not planning immigration with integration properly.

As that is impossible, the only real solution is likely to be multilateral and unified and require significant time, planning and resources. Targeting and alienating whole swathes of people because of their religion is not the answer. This will serve only to create two things: an environment where extremism and associated terrorism becomes a logical response to even more people; and an environment where the most horrific atrocities such as have been perpetrated in the past could occur again. A more constructive approach would be to pursue and prosecute terrorists and those who support and promote terrorism, whilst simultaneously working with communities and religious leaders (Islamic leaders) to reform where necessary and make it absolutely clear that killing of innocents, committing acts of suicide and generally being a cunt is not only contrary to the tenants of Islam, but also going to result in ending up in the firey depths of hell. To support this, there will be a need for education and integration from all sides so that the racism and intolerance that is quite palpable at the moment can be slowly but surely reduced. 

An interesting and measured essay on the subject can be found here:

http://www.hoover.org/research/religious-sources-islamic-terrorism

Unfortunately, all of this is going to require strong leaders who genuinely want to create peace rather than continue populist and nationalistic agendas that serve their own purposes. Looking at what's on offer from across the globe, we would seem to be shit out of luck. Corbyn has expressed some good ideas, but it would be like a one armed man trying to clap in an empty auditorium.

That all being said, I would also like to point out one further thing. Cunty bollocks fuck fuck.

Oh yeah, and pissflaps too.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Spanky said:

This debate has been raging for some time now and the views expressed on this thread, whether knee-jerk and emotional, or more considered, are not new. It is important to not ignore any of them as this is a snapshot of how people are feeling and where this and many other countries could be going if something constructive is not done.

The "true solution" would be to go back in time many, many years and for everyone not to do all of the things that has led us to this point in the first place, whether that is European colonialism, destabilising or invading sovereign countries such as Libya or Iraq, or simply not planning immigration with integration properly.

As that is impossible, the only real solution is likely to be multilateral and unified and require significant time, planning and resources. Targeting and alienating whole swathes of people because of their religion is not the answer. This will serve only to create two things: an environment where extremism and associated terrorism becomes a logical response to even more people; and an environment where the most horrific atrocities such as have been perpetrated in the past could occur again. A more constructive approach would be to pursue and prosecute terrorists and those who support and promote terrorism, whilst simultaneously working with communities and religious leaders (Islamic leaders) to reform where necessary and make it absolutely clear that killing of innocents, committing acts of suicide and generally being a cunt is not only contrary to the tenants of Islam, but also going to result in ending up in the firey depths of hell. To support this, there will be a need for education and integration from all sides so that the racism and intolerance that is quite palpable at the moment can be slowly but surely reduced. 

An interesting and measured essay on the subject can be found here:

http://www.hoover.org/research/religious-sources-islamic-terrorism

Unfortunately, all of this is going to require strong leaders who genuinely want to create peace rather than continue populist and nationalistic agendas that serve their own purposes. Looking at what's on offer from across the globe, we would seem to be shit out of luck. Corbyn has expressed some good ideas, but it would be like a one armed man trying to clap in an empty auditorium.

That all being said, I would also like to point out one further thing. Cunty bollocks fuck fuck.

Oh yeah, and pissflaps too.
 

It's not contrary to the tenants of Islam to kill infidels. There is roughly one hundred verses talking about killing infidels in the Quoran. The religious leaders can preach all they want but as long as the loophole exists it will continue to be exploited, and seeing as criticizing Islam is blasphemy the religious leaders are never going to seek to reform the writings.

So... next idea?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Spanky said:

Targeting and alienating whole swathes of people because of their religion is not the answer.

At the risk of sounding like Alfie, er, yes it is.

The trick for a mature, civilised, secular society would be to target all religions equally. Why in this day and age do we give a shit what the Archbishop of fucking Canterbury thinks? The Royal Family can fuck off too, with their "Fid Def" shit on our coins. We might perhaps stop somewhere just short of the Chairman Mao or Pol Pot approach, but if a visit to the arena to play with the lions is what it takes then it gets my vote.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Snatch
7 minutes ago, Roadkill said:

It's not contrary to the tenants of Islam to kill infidels. There is roughly one hundred verses talking about killing infidels in the Quoran. The religious leaders can preach all they want but as long as the loophole exists it will continue to be exploited, and seeing as criticizing Islam is blasphemy the religious leaders are never going to seek to reform the writings.

So... next idea?

The governments would lose billions in arms deals if this shit was sorted out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cuntybaws said:

At the risk of sounding like Alfie, er, yes it is.

The trick for a mature, civilised, secular society would be to target all religions equally. Why in this day and age do we give a shit what the Archbishop of fucking Canterbury thinks? The Royal Family can fuck off too, with their "Fid Def" shit on our coins. We might perhaps stop somewhere just short of the Chairman Mao or Pol Pot approach, but if a visit to the arena to play with the lions is what it takes then it gets my vote.

Exactly. Religion should be an entirely personal experience confined to churches, mosques and synagogues. None of that white should be allowed on the streets as it only divides people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Spanky
57 minutes ago, Cuntybaws said:

At the risk of sounding like Alfie, er, yes it is.

The trick for a mature, civilised, secular society would be to target all religions equally. Why in this day and age do we give a shit what the Archbishop of fucking Canterbury thinks? The Royal Family can fuck off too, with their "Fid Def" shit on our coins. We might perhaps stop somewhere just short of the Chairman Mao or Pol Pot approach, but if a visit to the arena to play with the lions is what it takes then it gets my vote.

I don't disagree with most of this. Every organised religion as far as I am concerned is all pretty silly and seems to revolve around the wearing of strange hats. The trouble is, as with the cases you have already pointed out, if religious freedom is not a given in a mature, secular society, then it will inevitably break down and chaos will ensue until a balance can be reached. A society without freedom of thought is not one that I want to live in and you can't have one without the other.

To conclude though, as I'm on my third Guinness foreign extra and capacity for sentient thought is diminishing, the royals are a bunch of cunts and can fuck right off. Extremists are cunts and so are suicide bummers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Spanky
1 hour ago, Roadkill said:

It's not contrary to the tenants of Islam to kill infidels. There is roughly one hundred verses talking about killing infidels in the Quoran. The religious leaders can preach all they want but as long as the loophole exists it will continue to be exploited, and seeing as criticizing Islam is blasphemy the religious leaders are never going to seek to reform the writings.

So... next idea?

Read the article in the link if you are interested as a smarter, more informed person than I am wrote it. I know fuck all about Islam in reality, but so do most people and that is the trouble. I don't have a problem with people believing in anything, so long as they have a positive and constructive impact on society and the world in general.

Edited by Spanky
Because I missed a word out and that made me look like a cunt, which I am
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cuntybaws said:

At the risk of sounding like Alfie, er, yes it is.

The trick for a mature, civilised, secular society would be to target all religions equally. Why in this day and age do we give a shit what the Archbishop of fucking Canterbury thinks? The Royal Family can fuck off too, with their "Fid Def" shit on our coins. We might perhaps stop somewhere just short of the Chairman Mao or Pol Pot approach, but if a visit to the arena to play with the lions is what it takes then it gets my vote.

Especially the ramblings of a goat herder from 2000 years ago. At least us Christian's had a messiah with a trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Eddie said:

Especially the ramblings of a goat herder from 2000 years ago. At least us Christian's had a messiah with a trade.

Always found it ironic that a carpenter was nailed to a cross. Wonder if he was giving the Roman soldiers woodworking advice as they were setting him up.

Also goat herding has always been a very successful trade in the middle east. It's just below goat pimping and just above directing/starring in goat porn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Spanky
3 minutes ago, Roadkill said:

Always found it ironic that a carpenter was nailed to a cross. Wonder if he was giving the Roman soldiers woodworking advice as they were setting him up.

I always thought he was a fisherman. Anyone who says otherwise should be burnt like the heretic witch that they are!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Spanky said:

I always thought he was a fisherman. Anyone who says otherwise should be burnt like the heretic witch that they are!

His mother was a lying whore, of that we can be certain. Probably a junky, too, she always looks well zoned out in her pictures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Spanky
9 minutes ago, Roadkill said:

His mother was a lying whore, of that we can be certain. Probably a junky, too, she always looks well zoned out in her pictures.

Just as well one of our members isn't an overzealous Catholic homosexual, likely to take exception to that comment. Otherwise said individual might try and find you and bum you senseless in retaliation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lady Penelope
28 minutes ago, Roadkill said:

Always found it ironic that a carpenter was nailed to a cross.

They actually used "no more nails"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Spanky said:

Just as well one of our members isn't an overzealous Catholic homosexual, likely to take exception to that comment. Otherwise said individual might try and find you and bum you senseless in retaliation.

I'd have his lights out before he got through the door. That's not even tough talk, I doubt a person riddled with decades of AIDS and sepsis from a breached digestive tract will be able to put up much of a fight. I'd just have to make sure to wear protection:

man-hazard-suit-layng-ground-wearing-nbc

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DingTheRioja
On 27/05/2017 at 8:50 PM, Roadkill said:

Always found it ironic that a carpenter was nailed to a cross. Wonder if he was giving the Roman soldiers woodworking advice as they were setting him up.

On 27/05/2017 at 8:54 PM, Spanky said:

I always thought he was a fisherman. Anyone who says otherwise should be burnt like the heretic witch that they are!

What were the last words Jesus heard?

"Oi mate, can you stick your feet together I've only got 3 nails left? cheers..."

 

On 27/05/2017 at 8:57 PM, Roadkill said:

His mother was a lying whore, of that we can be certain. Probably a junky, too, she always looks well zoned out in her pictures.

She was certainly zoned out of the last supper, or was that his whore of a wife...?

There seems to be a theme here....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...