camberwell gypsy Posted June 27, 2018 Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-44605200/this-four-year-old-s-art-sells-for-thousands Seriously? Fucking seriously? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bill Stickers Posted June 27, 2018 Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 Just now, camberwell gypsy said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-44605200/this-four-year-old-s-art-sells-for-thousands Seriously? Fucking seriously? Any chance of some deeper analysis, brainpower permitting? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
camberwell gypsy Posted June 27, 2018 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 39 minutes ago, William T.D. Stickers said: Any chance of some deeper analysis, brainpower permitting? Read the link and then tell me if he's an art prodigy or a kid throwing paint about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bill Stickers Posted June 27, 2018 Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 5 minutes ago, camberwell gypsy said: Read the link and then tell me if he's an art prodigy or a kid throwing paint about. If I want a news aggregator I’ll use google thanks, not a complete fucking retard such as yourself. Any chance we can hear your thoughtful opinion on the subject in more than 6 words? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
camberwell gypsy Posted June 27, 2018 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, William T.D. Stickers said: If I want a news aggregator I’ll use google thanks, not a complete fucking retard such as yourself. Any chance we can hear your thoughtful opinion on the subject in more than 6 words? What the fuck is with you? Go and annoying someone else you berk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colonelkurtz Posted June 27, 2018 Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 The experts say it's the dogs bollocks and worth thousands ... remember Cantonas' sardines and seagulls piss take quote years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Roops Posted June 27, 2018 Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 13 minutes ago, camberwell gypsy said: Read the link and then tell me if he's an art prodigy or a kid throwing paint about. Time will tell if Master Kolarkar is an art prodigy but the reason why his pictures sell "for thousands" (if true) is that he produces abstract art in its purest form. He can do this because at 4 years old he still hasn't been constrained by convention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
camberwell gypsy Posted June 27, 2018 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 19 minutes ago, Mrs Roops said: Time will tell if Master Kolarkar is an art prodigy but the reason why his pictures sell "for thousands" (if true) is that he produces abstract art in its purest form. He can do this because at 4 years old he still hasn't been constrained by convention. Thank you Sister Wendy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Piston Posted June 27, 2018 Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 23 minutes ago, Mrs Roops said: Time will tell if Master Kolarkar is an art prodigy but the reason why his pictures sell "for thousands" (if true) is that he produces abstract art in its purest form. He can do this because at 4 years old he still hasn't been constrained by convention. Hmm, I suppose that the same is true for all 4-year olds and 3 etc for that matter. I await a rash of international-art-theft gangs raiding nursery schools. I'm going to dig out some of my kids' old works and sally forth on eBay. PS A touch of the provocatrix m'am? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jiggerycock Posted June 27, 2018 Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 Just now, Piston said: Hmm, I suppose that the same is true for all 4-year olds and 3 etc for that matter. I await a rash of international-art-theft gangs raiding nursery schools. I'm going to dig out some of my kids' old works and sally forth on eBay. 'Works'? Oh how bourgeois! My grandson has just done a poonami in his nappy. There's no way that's going to the land-fill site, not all the while overseen cunts will pay a kings ransom for what a bunch of stupid haircuts deem is 'art'. I'm going for the 'Loads of money but a right dickhead', Gilbert and George market. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Piston Posted June 27, 2018 Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 (edited) 5 hours ago, Jiggerycock said: 'Works'? Oh how bourgeois! My grandson has just done a poonami in his nappy. There's no way that's going to the land-fill site, not all the while overseen cunts will pay a kings ransom for what a bunch of stupid haircuts deem is 'art'. I'm going for the 'Loads of money but a right dickhead', Gilbert and George market. Fuck! What a blind fool I am. Thank you master. Edit:Re 'Works': Suggest you tap your Irony Meter, the needle seems to be stuck. Edited June 27, 2018 by Piston Forgot retaliatory snark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Cuntman Posted June 27, 2018 Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 4 hours ago, Mrs Roops said: Time will tell if Master Kolarkar is an art prodigy but the reason why his pictures sell "for thousands" (if true) is that he produces abstract art in its purest form. He can do this because at 4 years old he still hasn't been constrained by convention. You know full well that the term "abstract art" is a sales tool employed by clever middle class cunts, to sell crap to thick middle class cunts. think Harry Enfield's 'I saw you coming' character. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest White van man Posted June 27, 2018 Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 18 minutes ago, Eric Cuntman said: You know full well that the term "abstract art" is a sales tool employed by clever middle class cunts, to sell crap to thick middle class cunts. think Harry Enfield's 'I saw you coming' character. I word hasn't been invented to descibe how mind numbingly stupid someone must be to spend £1000s on a piece of paper that some kids made a mess on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colonelkurtz Posted June 27, 2018 Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 Not a single critic/expert has noticed the picture is upside down .. or is it ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decimus Posted June 27, 2018 Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 4 hours ago, Piston said: I await a rash of international-art-theft gangs raiding nursery schools. With renowned artist Rolf Harris leading the charge. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bill Stickers Posted June 27, 2018 Report Share Posted June 27, 2018 33 minutes ago, White van man said: I word hasn't been invented to descibe how mind numbingly stupid someone must be to spend £1000s on a piece of paper that some kids made a mess on. Here’s I word for you. Idiot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest N/A Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 12 hours ago, Mrs Roops said: Time will tell if Master Kolarkar is an art prodigy but the reason why his pictures sell "for thousands" (if true) is that he produces abstract art in its purest form. He can do this because at 4 years old he still hasn't been constrained by convention. He has also not yet been constrained by at 4 years old not having the motor neuron skills to actually control his paint brush, control his hands, or indeed his toilet functions. Shit in a nappy went for $3 million . You are such a fucking pseudo intellectual Roops. Give it a rest. The kids a fucking dick with a brush swirling paint around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Drew P Pissflaps Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 15 hours ago, William T.D. Stickers said: If I want a news aggregator I’ll use google thanks, not a complete fucking retard such as yourself. Any chance we can hear your thoughtful opinion on the subject in more than 6 words? My thoughtful opinion is, I know the clique doesn't like to have an individual an original thought - for fear of upsetting the other bum bandit member (Decimus) but, you really come across as an irritating annoyance. Up your game or Kill Bill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Roops Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 6 hours ago, Monumental cunt said: He has also not yet been constrained by at 4 years old not having the motor neuron skills to actually control his paint brush, control his hands, or indeed his toilet functions. Shit in a nappy went for $3 million . You are such a fucking pseudo intellectual Roops. Give it a rest. The kids a fucking dick with a brush swirling paint around. Er...precisely. You've simply reiterated my point albeit in more visceral tones. Abstract art does not conform to accepted conventions of light, shape and form. There is no control or at least a perception of design. The "art" form was a late 19th century response to the increasing uniformity dictated by the needs of industrialisation though interestingly artists redefined the rules and fused form and abstract. Incidentally, the vast majority of 4 year olds will, apart from night-time issues, be out of nappies, though it would be remiss of me not to discount your own personal recollections... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Roops Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 17 hours ago, Piston said: ...PS A touch of the provocatrix m'am? The OP was sparse and had quickly morphed into a two-person bitchfest. It was a choice of either moving the thread to the Open Corner or inject some relevant narrative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wizardsleeve Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 Art is subjective at best. I doubt anybody will debate that. The problem with subjective, is the person doing that narrative or offering the critique is almost always a pretentious, sanctimonious cunt. They enjoy their own voice more than they actually get anything from the "piece" they are viewing or viewed. I've seen teachers droning on about a child's use of color in finger painting, and claim what talent lay beneath...does that make the running nosed little shit an artist? Just because their mind hasn't been corrupted, and I do agree children that aren't, I don't find two or three stick people holding hands while holding the lead to a stick dog, art. It's expression, yes, but not art. If said drawing had more three dimensional figures and features, I'd say the kid was a prodigy for understanding spatial depth and being keen enough to illustrate it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southerncunt Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 9 hours ago, Monumental cunt said: He has also not yet been constrained by at 4 years old not having the motor neuron skills to actually control his paint brush, control his hands, or indeed his toilet functions. Shit in a nappy went for $3 million . You are such a fucking pseudo intellectual Roops. Give it a rest. The kids a fucking dick with a brush swirling paint around. Motor neuron skills?! Fucking spastic. You really are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowy Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 1 hour ago, Wizardsleeve said: Art is subjective at best. I doubt anybody will debate that. The problem with subjective, is the person doing that narrative or offering the critique is almost always a pretentious, sanctimonious cunt. They enjoy their own voice more than they actually get anything from the "piece" they are viewing or viewed. I've seen teachers droning on about a child's use of color in finger painting, and claim what talent lay beneath...does that make the running nosed little shit an artist? Just because their mind hasn't been corrupted, and I do agree children that aren't, I don't find two or three stick people holding hands while holding the lead to a stick dog, art. It's expression, yes, but not art. If said drawing had more three dimensional figures and features, I'd say the kid was a prodigy for understanding spatial depth and being keen enough to illustrate it. I find Art not subjective at all I find it either good or you're being a pretentious cunt, I have no problem with the said four year old good for him take the fucking stupid cunts for anything you can,it's this idea that you can do anything slop a bit of shit on a wall great sell that cunt for millions,paint a great hand drawn picture of Maggie Thatchers snatch no not what we want. Young snowy spent his entire college life before Uni being angry at the shit they presented as art,Rothco was a particular hate ,great you're a painter now paint my living room you untalented wanker. Your gonna be surreal fine look at Dali,your gonna be a fucking nutworm then please fucking die. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decimus Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 23 minutes ago, Snowy the grate. said: Rothco was a particular hate ,great you're a painter now paint my living room you untalented wanker. I was completely unaware of this tosser until being dragged around the Tate Modern with Mrs. D, who amongst her other numerous faults, is a pretentious fucking cunt. After passing a wall piece of three dead seagulls impaled on arrows, soon enough we stumbled across a Rothko, which was essentially a canvas painted entirely in red. It was at this junction that I decided to politely ask her "What is this fucking shit?" Cue a boring lecture on the complexities of the shades and textures, followed by that most bollocks of fob-offs "Art is subjective". Call me a Philistine, but if chucking a tin of Dulux over fabric is considered a masterpiece, then that fat spastic cunt Fender could sell his XXL overalls for ten million quid. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowy Posted June 28, 2018 Report Share Posted June 28, 2018 15 minutes ago, Decimus said: I was completely unaware of this tosser until being dragged around the Tate Modern with Mrs. D, who amongst her other numerous faults, is a pretentious fucking cunt. After passing a wall piece of three dead seagulls impaled on arrows, soon enough we stumbled across a Rothko, which was essentially a canvas painted entirely in red. It was at this junction that I decided to politely ask her "What is this fucking shit?" Cue a boring lecture on the complexities of the shades and textures, followed by that most bollocks of fob-offs "Art is subjective". Call me a Philistine, but if chucking a tin of Dulux over fabric is considered a masterpiece, then that fat spastic cunt Fender could sell his XXL overalls for ten million quid. I expect fenders use of the odd cum stain to the overalls could bag him an art award,a noble peace prize and a suck off for her majesty,added hobnobs stuffed into the pockets and an empty rizzla packet. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.