Jump to content
CUNTS CORNER TWITTER ACCOUNT ID @CuntsCorner ×
Donations towards site upkeep will be thankfully received and faithfully applied....

The strange and recent phenomena of people who seemed healthy and wouldn’t in normal times be OK one day and 3 days later be dead.


King Billy

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Uncivil Servant said:

Sorry to correct thou, but babes don't cry in the womb thicko.

I would stand corrected if I’d said ‘in the womb’ but as I didn’t, just wrongly assumed that anyone with even the lowest possible intelligence level would be aware that babies, or ‘babes’ as you call them, cry (like a baby, funnily enough) as soon as they emerge into the world, be that naturally, or pulled out alive with a pair of huge forceps by some murderous cunt wearing a white coat.

Glad to be of help Babe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 22/06/2022 at 08:06, Mrs Roops said:

One death does not mitigate your relentless campaign of conspiracy-driven mis and disinformation.

Perhaps you will supply a verifiable link to support your story.

The JCVI according to their own estimates have stated that 2 million children would need to be jabbed twice to prevent one child from requiring ICU treatment. And yet they still reversed their initial advice against injecting children when Whitty, Vallance and the other newly Knighted cunt Van Tamm   disapprovingly shook their heads at such a crazy piece of anti science, off narrative madness. 
And what happened to the long established principle of ‘informed consent’?

As far as I’m aware no one who queued up like fucking lemmings to be experimented on was informed of the possible life changing or even life threatening side effects, before rolling up their sleeves like good little Guinea Pigs.

’Totally safe and totally effective’, except it might kill you and won’t stop you catching it or passing it on to others. 🤭

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, King Billy said:

The JCVI according to their own estimates have stated that 2 million children would need to be jabbed twice to prevent one child from requiring ICU treatment. And yet they still reversed their initial advice against injecting children when Whitty, Vallance and the other newly Knighted cunt Van Tamm   disapprovingly shook their heads at such a crazy piece of anti science, off narrative madness. 
And what happened to the long established principle of ‘informed consent’?

As far as I’m aware no one who queued up like fucking lemmings to be experimented on was informed of the possible life changing or even life threatening side effects, before rolling up their sleeves like good little Guinea Pigs.

’Totally safe and totally effective’, except it might kill you and won’t stop you catching it or passing it on to others. 🤭

I couldn’t have put it better. 
 

Peter Doshi and others published an abstract this week stating that the amount of serious and adverse events from this junk mitigates any benefit overall. Not to mention the thing is completely obsolete against Omicron and its sub-variants. 
 

Those that have not bowed to censorship, intimidation and personal threats are not going to let this scientific fraud go without redress. 
 

Anyone that gives these awful injections to their kids is a stupid fucking cunt.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, King Billy said:

The JCVI according to their own estimates have stated that 2 million children would need to be jabbed twice to prevent one child from requiring ICU treatment. And yet they still reversed their initial advice against injecting children when Whitty, Vallance and the other newly Knighted cunt Van Tamm   disapprovingly shook their heads at such a crazy piece of anti science, off narrative madness. 
And what happened to the long established principle of ‘informed consent’?

As far as I’m aware no one who queued up like fucking lemmings to be experimented on was informed of the possible life changing or even life threatening side effects, before rolling up their sleeves like good little Guinea Pigs.

’Totally safe and totally effective’, except it might kill you and won’t stop you catching it or passing it on to others. 🤭

Two questions; where did you read about the JCVI estimates? Are you saying that the risks of vaccination are higher than contracting Covid?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mrs Roops said:

Two questions; where did you read about the JCVI estimates? Are you saying that the risks of vaccination are higher than contracting Covid?

Jamie Jenkins, former ‘Head of health statistics’ at the ONS. He said exactly what I quoted, along with his analysis of the latest official Covid statistics on Wed. 22nd June on the Mark Steyn show on GB News. 39 mins into the show to be precise. Just look it up on YouTube and then tell me you know more than him.

Secondly, there are more than half a million reported cases of severe side effects in the U.K., almost 1.5 million in the US and the numbers are growing every day. More than 1300 people in the US have ‘officially’ died as a direct result of the vaccines. So yes I believe that for the vast majority of people the vaccine was and is a totally unnecessary risk. It puzzles me that you, who claim to possess a modicum of basic intelligence , still insist that these vaccines are safe, and calling anyone (me) who genuinely disagrees an idiot and conspiracy theorist more an indication of your ego driven character. 
I have no wish to keep getting into stupid mudslinging matches with you, but slagging  off everything I post will ensure that keeps happening but Hey Ho, that’s up to you. I’ll keep on doing what I do either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, King Billy said:

Jamie Jenkins, former ‘Head of health statistics’ at the ONS. He said exactly what I quoted, along with his analysis of the latest official Covid statistics on Wed. 22nd June on the Mark Steyn show on GB News. 39 mins into the show to be precise. Just look it up on YouTube and then tell me you know more than him.

Secondly, there are more than half a million reported cases of severe side effects in the U.K., almost 1.5 million in the US and the numbers are growing every day. More than 1300 people in the US have ‘officially’ died as a direct result of the vaccines. So yes I believe that for the vast majority of people the vaccine was and is a totally unnecessary risk. It puzzles me that you, who claim to possess a modicum of basic intelligence , still insist that these vaccines are safe, and calling anyone (me) who genuinely disagrees an idiot and conspiracy theorist more an indication of your ego driven character. 
I have no wish to keep getting into stupid mudslinging matches with you, but slagging  off everything I post will ensure that keeps happening but Hey Ho, that’s up to you. I’ll keep on doing what I do either way.

There must be a growing team of scrubbers, fiddlers, adjusters and filers at controls, as they are running out of cooks and rugs. They should enlist some BBC specialists to help with rubber-banding the drawers and computer hardware.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, King Billy said:

Jamie Jenkins, former ‘Head of health statistics’ at the ONS. He said exactly what I quoted, along with his analysis of the latest official Covid statistics on Wed. 22nd June on the Mark Steyn show on GB News. 39 mins into the show to be precise. Just look it up on YouTube and then tell me you know more than him.

Secondly, there are more than half a million reported cases of severe side effects in the U.K., almost 1.5 million in the US and the numbers are growing every day. More than 1300 people in the US have ‘officially’ died as a direct result of the vaccines. So yes I believe that for the vast majority of people the vaccine was and is a totally unnecessary risk. It puzzles me that you, who claim to possess a modicum of basic intelligence , still insist that these vaccines are safe, and calling anyone (me) who genuinely disagrees an idiot and conspiracy theorist more an indication of your ego driven character. 
I have no wish to keep getting into stupid mudslinging matches with you, but slagging  off everything I post will ensure that keeps happening but Hey Ho, that’s up to you. I’ll keep on doing what I do either way.

Well now, this is the second time I've watched the wannabe Tucker Carlson spew his nonsense and this is the second time I've witnessed an interviewee remaining silent whilst Mr Steyn perused his agenda. Jamie Jenkins, realising his statistician's objectivity was in danger of being compromised refused to play ball and went as far as to stress that he was not a medical scientist and would not be giving any medical analysis or advice.

As for your second para, I'm afraid you've been mugged for the gullible sap that you are. Again. Your story originates from comments made by Tory duffer Sir Christopher Chope on GB News, 

No evidence for MP’s claims ‘tens of thousands of people’ have ‘suffered severe damage’ from vaccines - Full Fact

Study Finds Side Effects of COVID mRNA Vaccines Mild, Short (webmd.com)

Whilst you may have no wish to get into "stupid mudslinging matches", I did warn you that admitting to making facts up and not caring if your version of reality is true or untrue would be problematic in the future. You reap what you sew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mrs Roops said:

Well now, this is the second time I've watched the wannabe Tucker Carlson spew his nonsense and this is the second time I've witnessed an interviewee remaining silent whilst Mr Steyn perused his agenda. Jamie Jenkins, realising his statistician's objectivity was in danger of being compromised refused to play ball and went as far as to stress that he was not a medical scientist and would not be giving any medical analysis or advice.

As for your second para, I'm afraid you've been mugged for the gullible sap that you are. Again. Your story originates from comments made by Tory duffer Sir Christopher Chope on GB News, 

No evidence for MP’s claims ‘tens of thousands of people’ have ‘suffered severe damage’ from vaccines - Full Fact

Study Finds Side Effects of COVID mRNA Vaccines Mild, Short (webmd.com)

Whilst you may have no wish to get into "stupid mudslinging matches", I did warn you that admitting to making facts up and not caring if your version of reality is true or untrue would be problematic in the future. You reap what you sew.

The two articles you quote are from organisations that take monies from the circle jerk supportive of big pharma. 

This article is free from any such bias.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31401-5

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, The Beast said:

The two articles you quote are from organisations that take monies from the circle jerk supportive of big pharma. 

This article is free from any such bias.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31401-5

 

Can't we all just agree that humans are fundamentally hardwired to perceive any source that goes against their own personal bias as a threat and will instinctively seek to poke holes in any such offered.

Every fucking source is biased - or the slightly more intelligent monkey at the keyboard wouldn't have bothered writing it - because it would then be fact and not argument, and the other monkeys don't give a shit about solid facts, because then they can't argue amongst themselves and throw shit at each other all day.

For fuck sake, even I don't know what I'm writing at this point. Philosophy, I think - but either way, I'd like to stop thinking about it every waking moment - especially when I only logged in to browse the site whilst taking a shit, and now my legs and arse have went numb from the time it took to write this.

Anyway, time to wipe. Carry on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, King Billy said:

sow? 🤣

Definitely. I tested positive for the old kung flu, Bill. I felt rough for about four day's and just put it down to a cold with an incredibly sore throat. I've previously had influenza and can categorically state that Covid isn't a patch on it. That wiped me out for two fucking week's and developed into bronchitis as i presumed i had just had a nasty cold.

A paramedic told me that earlier in the day they had a patient die of a cardiac arrest and the hospital put it down as Covid. 

From the horses mouth mate!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Penelope Alive said:

Surely Tucker Billy's posts on here are proof of one side effect of the various vaccines?

Tucker Billy? says the freak who spends an hour ‘tucking’ his humongous cock between his varicose vein riddled legs and adjusting his fake Velcro vagina before he goes out in public pretending he’s a female.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, King Billy said:

Tucker Billy? says the freak who spends an hour ‘tucking’ his humongous cock between his varicose vein riddled legs and adjusting his fake Velcro vagina before he goes out in public pretending he’s a female.

It must be a struggle pulling off a Buffalo Bill act from Silence Of The Lambs whilst using a zimmer frame.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Major Cunt said:

It must be a struggle pulling off a Buffalo Bill act from Silence Of The Lambs whilst using a zimmer frame.

Never mind a Zimmer frame. I’m reliably informed that in preparation for a forthcoming medical examination, Lord/Lady Penelope (he/him, she/her) currently has more scaffolding round his/her enormous appendage than Grenfell Tower. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, The Beast said:

The two articles you quote are from organisations that take monies from the circle jerk supportive of big pharma. 

This article is free from any such bias.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31401-5

 

That's prime conspiracy paranoia...

As for your link, the article isn't going to change much - too many ifs, buts, speculation and needing more investigation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 27/06/2022 at 10:20, Mrs Roops said:

Jamie Jenkins, realising his statistician's objectivity was in danger of being compromised refused to play ball and went as far as to stress that he was not a medical scientist and would not be giving any medical analysis or advice.

Now why would he do that? Surely not because Ofcom at the beginning of the Covid psyop warned all the broadcast media about straying from the Government narrative, and the consequences of any such misbehaviour. Needless to say, the fakestream puppets, all receiving millions of taxpayers money to run the 24hr Covid scaremongering adverts dutifully obeyed. 
That was then, this is now and at least GB News have the courage to reveal the extent of the dishonesty which I believe you and many of the sheep are starting to see at last. If not then you’re actually thicker than I thought.

Finally, if you had a 6 month old baby would you have it injected? I ask this as you haven’t disputed any of the statistics that Jamie Jenkins stated, just more of your usual deflecting and whataboutery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Mrs Roops said:

That's prime conspiracy paranoia...

As for your link, the article isn't going to change much - too many ifs, buts, speculation and needing more investigation. 

You can write it off as that, but you know that some who donate will bear some influence on policy or direction. To dismiss this as paranoia is delusional.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Beast said:

You can write it off as that, but you know that some who donate will bear some influence on policy or direction. To dismiss this as paranoia is delusional.

 

I would in the case of anyone other than her, think that she may tragically be suffering from a series of multiple Covid jab adverse reactions. Possibly a number of huge clots on her equally huge brain, but her delusionary antics predate Covid by a very long time. My prayers are with her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 27/06/2022 at 14:19, Roadkill said:

Can't we all just agree that humans are fundamentally hardwired to perceive any source that goes against their own personal bias as a threat and will instinctively seek to poke holes in any such offered.

Every fucking source is biased - or the slightly more intelligent monkey at the keyboard wouldn't have bothered writing it - because it would then be fact and not argument, and the other monkeys don't give a shit about solid facts, because then they can't argue amongst themselves and throw shit at each other all day.

For fuck sake, even I don't know what I'm writing at this point. Philosophy, I think - but either way, I'd like to stop thinking about it every waking moment - especially when I only logged in to browse the site whilst taking a shit, and now my legs and arse have went numb from the time it took to write this.

Anyway, time to wipe. Carry on.

Touching cloth?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, King Billy said:

Now why would he do that? Surely not because Ofcom at the beginning of the Covid psyop warned all the broadcast media about straying from the Government narrative, and the consequences of any such misbehaviour. Needless to say, the fakestream puppets, all receiving millions of taxpayers money to run the 24hr Covid scaremongering adverts dutifully obeyed. 
That was then, this is now and at least GB News have the courage to reveal the extent of the dishonesty which I believe you and many of the sheep are starting to see at last. If not then you’re actually thicker than I thought.

Finally, if you had a 6 month old baby would you have it injected? I ask this as you haven’t disputed any of the statistics that Jamie Jenkins stated, just more of your usual deflecting and whataboutery.

Where's the deflection and whataboutery, that's your gig, surely?

As for your lies about Ofcom, let's have a look,

Broadcast standards during the coronavirus pandemic - Ofcom

It appears you missed the bit where Ofcom asserts,

"Consistent with the right to freedom of expression, broadcasters have the editorial freedom to analyse, discuss and challenge issues relating to the coronavirus."

This is contrary to your risible nonsense about Ofcom "warning all broadcast media about straying from the Government narrative". Also note the only broadcast outlets who have been sanctioned appear to be an obscure American-funded Christian channel and an Afro-Caribbean radio station.

Apropos Jamie Jenkins "statistics" this bothered me somewhat because at 40:08 he refers to the '4 million jabs/1 child in ICU' data as a vaccination scenario for "non-urgent use". Blink and you'll miss it. This concerned me as its not the usual terminology I'd expect to see used by the ONS or the JCVI and I needed a few minutes to deep dive this. It appears Mr Steyn was being very selective in his selection of statistics and was referring to a computer modelling scenario of a 'less severe future wave'. Setting aside that Mr Steyn chose to ignore the 17 children not being admitted to hospital per one million vaccinated, he also chose not to dwell on the 'more severe future wave' scenario. I can see why Mr Steyn is under Ofcom investigation.

You must be tired of wiping egg off your face.

One mo' thing, the answer to your impertinent question is no, a moot question in any case as the jab is not available, nor recommended in the UK for children under five.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...