Republican Cunts are Bad Losers

[ChildeHarold]

17 hours ago, Stubby Pecker said:

Panzy you prat, why the big chip on both shoulders over Brexit? I liked you better as the happy go lucky bog peasant you undoubtedly are in real life. Those tales of destroying the backdoors of the Emerald Isles overs 60s post a late night jog were a thing of beauty.

James Joyce was a cunt. 

Musn't criticise Brexit must we. Musn't question.... 

[Stubby Pecker]

2 minutes ago, ChildeHarold said:

Musn't criticise Brexit must we. Musn't question.... 

kill yourself

[ChildeHarold]

3 minutes ago, Stubby Pecker said:

kill yourself

It's all gone Pete Tong. Go on take a test.. 

A FUCKING REALITY TEST. 

[Stubby Pecker]

Just now, ChildeHarold said:

It's all gone Pete Tong. Go on take a test.. 

A FUCKING REALITY TEST. 

That’s the 4th or 5th time you’re used that Pete Tong phrase in the past 24 hours 

It’s obvious you’ve a learning disability 

[Trucking Funt]

8 minutes ago, ChildeHarold said:

Look at him now! 

In what way? He fucking minted and one of the top lawyers in the US. He also owns a successful cybersecurity company.

[ChildeHarold]

Just now, Trucking Funt said:

In what way? He fucking minted and one of the top lawyers in the US. He also owns a successful cybersecurity company.

Your values are different from mine dear boy. 

[ChildeHarold]

3 minutes ago, Stubby Pecker said:

That’s the 4th or 5th time you’re used that Pete Tong phrase in the past 24 hours 

It’s obvious you’ve a learning disability 

Bad loser. Ha ha ha. You're a living fossil. Celocanth Stubby. A new species. Take a deep breath and smell the coffee. 

LOL Toodle pip. 

[Penny Farthing]

On 05/11/2020 at 07:34, Earl of Punkape said:

I’ll bet you don’t need anyone to suck your dick as you do it yourself...

lol.

I bet that you would do it at a stretch in your back office if you have a chance.

[Penny Farthing]

23 hours ago, camberwell gypsy said:

Mtembe is out giving parking tickets in W1. 

Actually doing it in CH41 & CH42.

[Trucking Funt]

4 minutes ago, ChildeHarold said:

Your values are different from mine dear boy. 

I don't see any problem with admiring somebody who's been successful in life. Oh! I forgot you're a fucking trot and think everyone should be poor except for the champagne socialists.

[Goober]

41 minutes ago, Dawn Chorus said:

I bet that you would do it at a stretch in your back office if you have a chance.

Do you mean to type stretched back orifice? 

[ChildeHarold]

1 hour ago, Trucking Funt said:

I don't see any problem with admiring somebody who's been successful in life. Oh! I forgot you're a fucking trot and think everyone should be poor except for the champagne socialists.

I couldn't have dreamt up more catastrophic circumstances for the demise of Trumpism, the fucking pathetic struggling Johnson, and Brexit. Wow. It's ALL gone Pete Tong for the fucking right wing scabs and neo Thatcherites. Ha ha ha. Nightmare scenario. Ha ha ha. 

[Trucking Funt]

1 minute ago, ChildeHarold said:

I couldn't have dreamt up more catastrophic circumstances for the demise of Trumpism, the fucking pathetic struggling Johnson, and Brexit. Wow. It's ALL gone Pete Tong for the fucking right wing scabs and neo Thatcherites. Ha ha ha. Nightmare scenario. Ha ha ha. 

Let's see what the outcome is of the inevitable case that will be put before the US Supreme court, shall we.

[Earl of Punkape]

5 minutes ago, Trucking Funt said:

Let's see what the outcome is of the inevitable case that will be put before the US Supreme court, shall we.

Trump is going to lose.

Stop grasping for the sailed ship...

[Goober]

14 minutes ago, Trucking Funt said:

Let's see what the outcome is of the inevitable case that will be put before the US Supreme court, shall we.

Punkers is right.

Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Georgia are all going blue. At a stretch Trump might overturn one state in court, but not at least three, which he'd need. 

Whatever the political leanings of the Supreme Court's justices they are still bound by the law and they're usually hesitant to get involved in election issues. Nearly all of the cases brought by the GOP so far have been thrown out for being completely groundless. 

This election is all over bar the shouting, or should I say shooting?

[Decimus]

17 minutes ago, Goober said:

Punkers is right.

Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Georgia are all going blue. At a stretch Trump might overturn one state in court, but not at least three, which he'd need. 

Whatever the political leanings of the Supreme Court's justices they are still bound by the law and they're usually hesitant to get involved in election issues. Nearly all of the cases brought by the GOP so far have been thrown out for being completely groundless. 

This election is all over bar the shouting, or should I say shooting?

I thought we had it bad when we were asked to choose between that Chairman Miaow Catweazle tosser and Billy Bunter last year. Imagine being an American and only having a binary choice between some cunt who should be tucked up at home in his slippers sucking on a Werther's Original and the pussy grabbing Honey Monster. Jesus wept.

[Trucking Funt]

32 minutes ago, Earl of Punkape said:

Trump is going to lose.

Stop grasping for the sailed ship...

I'm not saying he isn't going to lose but on the other hand, everyone said the same about George W Bush in Florida which won the 2000 election and the Democrats tried using exactly the same tactics that Trump is using now.

[Trucking Funt]

25 minutes ago, Goober said:

Punkers is right.

Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Georgia are all going blue. At a stretch Trump might overturn one state in court, but not at least three, which he'd need. 

Whatever the political leanings of the Supreme Court's justices they are still bound by the law and they're usually hesitant to get involved in election issues. Nearly all of the cases brought by the GOP so far have been thrown out for being completely groundless. 

This election is all over bar the shouting, or should I say shooting?

The way I see it, the Democrats have spent 4 years refusing to respect the result of the last election which has included included gross abuse of process in the form of a frivolous impeachment trial and deliberate sabotage of numerous bills in congress purely for the purposes of damaging Trump's presidency. 

The Supreme court is indeed bound by the law but can you honestly say Trump's case would have been given a fair hearing by the likes of the late Ruth Bader Ginsberg who disgraced her office by calling on Trump to resign while he was president-elect?

As I've just pointed out, the Supreme court intervened in Florida in 2000 when the Democrats tried to bulldoze Al Gore into office and after the wave of destruction unleashed by Biden's supporters on the run up to the election, I find it unlikely that they haven't engaged in some sort of political chicanery as well. I will grant you that Trump is going about this the wrong way by giving a running commentary over twitter and giving press conferences before a full investigation has been carried out but that's not to completely rule out that there isn't something in this.

[camberwell gypsy]

2 hours ago, Stubby Pecker said:

That’s the 4th or 5th time you’re used that Pete Tong phrase in the past 24 hours 

It’s obvious you’ve a learning disability 

Pete Tong. Ramalama dingdong. 

[PANZER MURPHY]

1 hour ago, Decimus said:

I thought we had it bad when we were asked to choose between that Chairman Miaow Catweazle tosser and Billy Bunter last year. Imagine being an American and only having a binary choice between some cunt who should be tucked up at home in his slippers sucking on a Werther's Original and the pussy grabbing Honey Monster. Jesus wept.

Laffin..

PANZERMURPHYBABY 

[Goober]

39 minutes ago, Trucking Funt said:

The way I see it, the Democrats have spent 4 years refusing to respect the result of the last election which has included included gross abuse of process in the form of a frivolous impeachment trial and deliberate sabotage of numerous bills in congress purely for the purposes of damaging Trump's presidency. 

The Supreme court is indeed bound by the law but can you honestly say Trump's case would have been given a fair hearing by the likes of the late Ruth Bader Ginsberg who disgraced her office by calling on Trump to resign while he was president-elect?

As I've just pointed out, the Supreme court intervened in Florida in 2000 when the Democrats tried to bulldoze Al Gore into office and after the wave of destruction unleashed by Biden's supporters on the run up to the election, I find it unlikely that they haven't engaged in some sort of political chicanery as well. I will grant you that Trump is going about this the wrong way by giving a running commentary over twitter and giving press conferences before a full investigation has been carried out but that's not to completely rule out that there isn't something in this.

Some of your points are valid, but I don't necessarily agree with them all. I don't think the Democrats ever really got over the shock of losing four years ago, much like the Republicans will struggle to get over this loss. 

Florida in 2000 came down to just over 500 votes and there was a legitimate issue not covered by existing law that needed to be decided. That gave the justices an opportunity to go with their preexisting leanings. That's not the case this time. 

Trump is throwing around accusations of large scale fraud which just aren't true and there's no evidence to support them. Yes, there is always some fraud of perhaps hundreds of votes per state, but that goes both ways. It's largely the result of the actions of individuals rather than organised fraud on a large scale. Trump's actions now are just hurting democracy. After all, half brained Americans, if they buy into his rhetoric, may well just think in the future if it's rigged why bother to vote at all? 

I'll be astonished if one state gets overturned, let alone the three Trump is likely to need. He definitely needs to shut the fuck up though and let the counting finish before either conceding or challenging, if there really are legitimate grounds to do so. 

Of course, in the next 4 years the shoe will be on the other foot and we'll see the Senate stymieing everything Biden tries to achieve. It's tit for tat and has been thus for quite some time. 

Decs is right though, they're both awful candidates and that by itself is a damning indictment of American politics. 

[Penny Farthing]

10 minutes ago, Goober said:

Some of your points are valid, but I don't necessarily agree with them all. I don't think the Democrats ever really got over the shock of losing four years ago, much like

Decs is right though, they're both awful candidates and that by itself is a damning indictment of American politics. 

I get the feeling that win or lose Trump will leave the White House in a box. As for Biden I think that he will end his term in a box too.

[ChildeHarold]

3 hours ago, Trucking Funt said:

Let's see what the outcome is of the inevitable case that will be put before the US Supreme court, shall we.

The only inevitable thing on this thread is your stupidity and your infantile clinging to a pre-covid fantasy world that had no relationship to reality anyway. 

[ChildeHarold]

52 minutes ago, Dawn Chorus said:

I get the feeling that win or lose Trump will leave the White House in a box. As for Biden I think that he will end his term in a box too.

I like a nice box, cherry, mahogany, walnut, pine - how about the new bio degradable recycled cardboard? Choose the handles (they take them off and sell them before the furnace) SO WHAT'S YOUR FUCKING POINT ARSEHOLE? 

[ChildeHarold]

1 hour ago, Goober said:

Some of your points are valid, but I don't necessarily agree with them all. I don't think the Democrats ever really got over the shock of losing four years ago, much like the Republicans will struggle to get over this loss. 

Florida in 2000 came down to just over 500 votes and there was a legitimate issue not covered by existing law that needed to be decided. That gave the justices an opportunity to go with their preexisting leanings. That's not the case this time. 

Trump is throwing around accusations of large scale fraud which just aren't true and there's no evidence to support them. Yes, there is always some fraud of perhaps hundreds of votes per state, but that goes both ways. It's largely the result of the actions of individuals rather than organised fraud on a large scale. Trump's actions now are just hurting democracy. After all, half brained Americans, if they buy into his rhetoric, may well just think in the future if it's rigged why bother to vote at all? 

I'll be astonished if one state gets overturned, let alone the three Trump is likely to need. He definitely needs to shut the fuck up though and let the counting finish before either conceding or challenging, if there really are legitimate grounds to do so. 

Of course, in the next 4 years the shoe will be on the other foot and we'll see the Senate stymieing everything Biden tries to achieve. It's tit for tat and has been thus for quite some time. 

Decs is right though, they're both awful candidates and that by itself is a damning indictment of American politics. 

It's always the same old mantra, "they're both awful candidates". How long have you been around? Just fallen off a tree?