Guest Couldn't give a shit Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 James Whale has been suspended from Talk radio for not showing this fucking fruitcake enough sensitivity after she revealed that she had been "orally raped" by a random stranger who jumped into her taxi. James Whale is highly adept at exposing attention seeking fuckwits on his show. I'm only surprised that he didn’t ask her why she didn't bite down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuntybaws Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 From The Guardian: "Nichi Hodgson is a sex and relationships broadcaster" From Wikipedia: "Nichi Hodgson is a British journalist, broadcaster, author and former dominatrix." Presumably no stranger to the taste of cock, then, but that doesn't mean some stranger is entitled to tickle her tonsils with his, willy nilly. A gentleman always goes tits first. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decimus Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 I've just listened to the interview, and as far as I can tell, he was asking legitimate questions about an event that the alleged victim was rather hazy about. She criticises the police for not doing anything as CCTV is deleted after 30 days, even though she apparently reported the incident the next day. When asked why she did not provide the number of the taxi, she claims that she was too drunk to remember, despite the fact this was undoubtedly on her phone or could quite quickly be discovered by a formal police investigation. Finally, she had the audacity to state that she didn't take it further as she did not want to be subjected to a lengthy court case that would have resulted in an acquittal, despite vocally supporting the #metoo movement and women doing everything they can to bring sexual assaulters to account. She's right about one thing, it would have been an acquittal, as she is quite clearly making the whole incident up. When asked to provide corroborating evidence, she clearly couldn't and instead threw a hissy fit and got a man suspended from his job. Apparently it would seem that in this country women can now make up fantastical stories about rape that have the potential to cost a man his liberty, and no one is allowed to question the validity of their bullshit through fear of a media backlash. Can someone tell me when the entire male British population became emasculated enough to allow this shit to happen? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Roops Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 This is an appalling nom and will invite the usual suspects to crawl out of the woodwork. Despite conviction rates for reported rape and sexual offences being so low I don't think even the most rabid of feminists have called for the "beyond reasonable doubt" threshold of criminal guilt to be weakened to the civil case standard of "balance of probabilities". I know little of Ms Hodgson and even less of what she stands for, but to castigate an alleged sex-crime victim for having a "hissy fit" when faced with an onslaught of victim shaming (for that was what it was) and for an image conscious idiot of a radio presenter to act as self appointed QC for an unidentified assailant only reinforces the notion that we still have someway to go to recognising the way society treats complainants. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuntybaws Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 26 minutes ago, Mrs Roops said: Despite conviction rates for reported rape and sexual offences being so low I don't think even the most rabid of feminists have called for the "beyond reasonable doubt" threshold of criminal guilt to be weakened to the civil case standard of "balance of probabilities". Luckily a general election came along, or this petition might have garnered as many as 50 votes. https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/177128 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Couldn't give a shit Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 1 hour ago, Mrs Roops said: This is an appalling nom and will invite the usual suspects to crawl out of the woodwork. Despite conviction rates for reported rape and sexual offences being so low I don't think even the most rabid of feminists have called for the "beyond reasonable doubt" threshold of criminal guilt to be weakened to the civil case standard of "balance of probabilities". I know little of Ms Hodgson and even less of what she stands for, but to castigate an alleged sex-crime victim for having a "hissy fit" when faced with an onslaught of victim shaming (for that was what it was) and for an image conscious idiot of a radio presenter to act as self appointed QC for an unidentified assailant only reinforces the notion that we still have someway to go to recognising the way society treats complainants. So what is your opinion on the recent scandal regarding the deliberate concealment of crucial evidence by the police from defence counsel in a number of rape cases which resulted in innocent men's lives being utterly destroyed? Also, do you think that false rape complainants should be given harsher penalties? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 Its only rape if my cheque bounces 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuntybaws Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 2 hours ago, Mrs Roops said: This is an appalling nom and will invite the usual suspects to crawl out of the woodwork. 27 minutes ago, Neil said: Its only rape if my cheque bounces 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuntybaws Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 3 hours ago, Decimus said: I've just listened to the interview, and as far as I can tell, he was asking legitimate questions about an event that the alleged victim was rather hazy about. I've checked out the audio and video, and it's safe to say that while Whale is an oily fucking cunt (nothing new there) Hodgson's story has more holes in it than, er, well, let's just say it's got a lot of holes in it. I must admire Whale's restraint, though, for not asking whether she might be able to pick the perp out of a line-up using her sense of taste alone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest luke swarm Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 20 minutes ago, Cuntybaws said: I must admire Whale's restraint, though, for not asking whether she might be able to pick the perp out of a line-up using her sense of taste alone. like the nomination itself, this comment is just in extremely bad taste. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wizardsleeve Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 2 hours ago, luke swarm said: like the nomination itself, this comment is just in extremely bad taste. Well done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penny Farthing Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 30 minutes ago, Wizardsleeve said: Well done. I did think that you had "mellow"ed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wizardsleeve Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 6 minutes ago, Slippers said: I did think that you had "mellow"ed. I know that post has some meaning to you. Do us all a favour, and keep it that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penny Farthing Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 8 minutes ago, Wizardsleeve said: I know that post has some meaning to you. Do us all a favour, and keep it that way. ok. Mike. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wizardsleeve Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 5 minutes ago, Slippers said: ok. Mike. First it was Ivan, then Franklin, now Mike. You have gone over the cliff. For some cunt admitted to being a multi, you have a lot of cheek accusing me! Fuck off and kill yourself, you unbelievably dull creature. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penny Farthing Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, Wizardsleeve said: First it was Ivan, then Franklin, now Mike. You have gone over the cliff. For some cunt admitted to being a multi, you have a lot of cheek accusing me! Fuck off and kill yourself, you unbelievably dull creature. Sorry Ivan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wizardsleeve Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, Slippers said: Sorry Ivan. Boring fucking cunt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penny Farthing Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 Just now, Wizardsleeve said: Boring fucking cunt. I am not important to you am I .. I mean its not as if you are following me around the forum is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wizardsleeve Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 14 minutes ago, Slippers said: I am not important to you am I .. I mean its not as if you are following me around the forum is it? Pot, kettle... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest judgetwi Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 10 hours ago, Mrs Roops said: This is an appalling nom and will invite the usual suspects to crawl out of the woodwork. Despite conviction rates for reported rape and sexual offences being so low I don't think even the most rabid of feminists have called for the "beyond reasonable doubt" threshold of criminal guilt to be weakened to the civil case standard of "balance of probabilities". I know little of Ms Hodgson and even less of what she stands for, but to castigate an alleged sex-crime victim for having a "hissy fit" when faced with an onslaught of victim shaming (for that was what it was) and for an image conscious idiot of a radio presenter to act as self appointed QC for an unidentified assailant only reinforces the notion that we still have someway to go to recognising the way society treats complainants. Yeah, “appalling” in your trendy middle class world. Anybody who is a “wimminz” or a “gay” is automatically a hero and a victim in your world. Well let me tell you that there is always a backlash against the Establishment. Eventually real people will have had enough of dumb cunts like you. All your abuse and stupid. cartoons will count for nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowy Posted August 5, 2018 Report Share Posted August 5, 2018 Watched it,some cunt talking over the interviewer, gets sacked because he couldn't get a word in edge ways,I'm thinking of sending my wife on to radio so I can bag me some money. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stubby Pecker Posted August 5, 2018 Report Share Posted August 5, 2018 6 hours ago, judgetwi said: Yeah, “appalling” in your trendy middle class world. Anybody who is a “wimminz” or a “gay” is automatically a hero and a victim in your world. Well let me tell you that there is always a backlash against the Establishment. Eventually real people will have had enough of dumb cunts like you. All your abuse and stupid. cartoons will count for nothing. Steady judgie, if I recall, the only appalling victim the brilliant mrs R is familiar with is the soiled tampon hanging out of her haddock sluice that she forced upon every poor cunt here. In fact, every bugger who saw it could be classed as a victim. Just imagine if bubba and frank posted photos of their little willies, pre frotting, with objects sticking out the japs eyes? I'm sure the "female" puntership would claim their eyes had been raped Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs Roops Posted August 5, 2018 Report Share Posted August 5, 2018 16 hours ago, Couldn't give a shit said: So what is your opinion on the recent scandal regarding the deliberate concealment of crucial evidence by the police from defence counsel in a number of rape cases which resulted in innocent men's lives being utterly destroyed? Also, do you think that false rape complainants should be given harsher penalties? My post was more about societal attitudes rather than gender disparities in the criminal justice system but since you ask, its disappointing for both the alleged victim and the alleged defendant, not only for the reason you've alluded to but also to the victim who has justice denied due to errors made in the judicial process, thanks in part to the appalling stewardship of former Justice Secretary Chris Grayling who bought in the privatising of the Probation Service amongst other things. Like him or loath him, at least Michael Gove, who has a reputation for attention to detail was in the process of unravelling Grayling's mess but was prevented by Mrs May in completing the work. In answer to your second question I believe the entire sentencing guidelines with regards to sex offenders needs overhauling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cuntspotter Posted August 5, 2018 Report Share Posted August 5, 2018 Mr Whale is guilty of poor judgement and bad taste. There isn’t anything that can be investigated so it was best left alone. He gave her the oxygen of publicity purely to pull her to pieces. I don’t know the truth of the matter, none of us do. This should have been left well alone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted August 5, 2018 Report Share Posted August 5, 2018 In keeping with the theme of people called Whale, I wonder what Neil's up to on this blazing afternoon? Norfolk Hick Gazette, 06 August: 'Underwear Theft From Washing Lines Soars To Record High'. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.