Jump to content
CUNTS CORNER TWITTER ACCOUNT ID @CuntsCorner ×
Donations towards site upkeep will be thankfully received and faithfully applied....

Driverless truck and car cunts


Earl of Punkape

Recommended Posts

Guest Alfie Noakes
1 hour ago, ratcum said:

Can I just say I've never like Alfie and that Punkape. Also, they strike me as the sort who would deliberately keep kittens awake for an unnecessarily long period of time.

No.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Decimus said:

@Stubby Pecker please could you have a word with Roops as you are the only one she appears to be in awe of. I hardly think it's fair that she is castigating Alfie as well as Punkape when Alf has done nothing wrong, wouldn't you agree? Use your power for good.

Here, my powers are only used for evil, I'm only a superhero in real life. I agree, Alfred is only being an honest chap and puke-ape is acting a proper tit again. His original controller must be back from hols. 

I wouldn't, however, suggest our quite brilliant overloard isn't 100% spot on with her handling of this matter. I'd lay low for a while if I were you, for all our sakes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Cuntybaws said:

Harsh but fair.

Is this because I told everyone you were dead?

No, that I can forgive, but rubbing my nose in ramblings about your alcohol consumption is taking the fucking piss. It's like kicking a proud former champion while he's on the canvas gasping for breath.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bill Stickers
13 hours ago, camberwell gypsy said:

It hasn't. It's descended into the usual mindless abuse. 

At this point it's fairly well established this is how the site works. If you don't like it fuck off you boring tart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lady Penelope
18 hours ago, camberwell gypsy said:

I'd love to see you make me,  you shriveled cocked fairy. 

Its best to stay off sticker's side Camb's, he only likes "man" things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Guest Lady Penelope
24 minutes ago, Ape said:

So Philip Hammond is going to allow driverless car testing to begin in earnest, with a view to them being on the roads by 2021. I’m obviously missing the point here, because I don't understand why we need driverless cars in the first place. 

Luddite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ape said:

So Philip Hammond is going to allow driverless car testing to begin in earnest, with a view to them being on the roads by 2021. I’m obviously missing the point here, because I don't understand why we need driverless cars in the first place. 

It's in preparation for Brexit when all the Uber drivers get sent home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bill Stickers
8 hours ago, Ape said:

So Philip Hammond is going to allow driverless car testing to begin in earnest, with a view to them being on the roads by 2021. I’m obviously missing the point here, because I don't understand why we need driverless cars in the first place. 

What is difficult to understand?

Think about how fucking stupid the average cunt is. Then try and rationalise that the average aforementioned fuckwits, the general public, are allowed manual control of a tonne or so of metal, that is capable of hurtling around at 120MPH.

Driverless cars will ease traffic flow, improve fuel economy, and greatly reduce casualties on the roads through much better driving. Every instance of machine error will be mitigated against, having avoided thousands of instances of human error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest luke swarm
8 minutes ago, William T.D. Stickers said:

What is difficult to understand?

Think about how fucking stupid the average cunt is. Then try and rationalise that the average aforementioned fuckwits, the general public, are allowed manual control of a tonne or so of metal, that is capable of hurtling around at 120MPH.

Driverless cars will ease traffic flow, improve fuel economy, and greatly reduce casualties on the roads through much better driving. Every instance of machine error will be mitigated against, having avoided thousands of instances of human error.

well there will be winners and losers, I would welcome a machine to do my driving as long as I can occasionally override it when I want to exceed speed limits etc, one group of losers will obviously be the Allah Akbar chaps who hire a large van or truck for the weekend to destroy infidels, has anybody given any thought to their needs.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bill Stickers
6 minutes ago, luke swarm said:

well there will be winners and losers, I would welcome a machine to do my driving as long as I can occasionally override it when I want to exceed speed limits etc, one group of losers will obviously be the Allah Akbar chaps who hire a large van or truck for the weekend to destroy infidels, has anybody given any thought to their needs.   

Another losing being Ape the long distance lorry driver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst “driverless”, the cars will still require human interaction to function fully. Safety controls of the hard/software will alert the occupant of the vehicle if it feels they’re not able to take control. 

For instance, should a cunt be: consuming the fecal contents of its packed lunch (quince), fallen asleep after reading the CC cricket thread; or be masturbating furiously at gay porn (punky), then it’ll alert the occupant or simply (and safely) stop.

I for one think they’ll be a great addition to our fucking insanely busy, full of stupid cunts, poorly designed roads.

Fuck off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest luke swarm
3 minutes ago, William T.D. Stickers said:

Another losing being Ape the long distance lorry driver.

he is wasted on that haulage job Bill......that lad has quite a bit of scientific aptitude and is something of an authority on the Earths rotational speed and factors affecting it( see the free energy thread). The demise of the Haulage and Prostitute battering industry may well give Mr Ape the push he needs to further his potential.      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, William T.D. Stickers said:

Every instance of machine error will be mitigated against, having avoided thousands of instances of human error.

The problem is, the vast majority of the British populace are thick, reactionary fucking wankers.

Regardless of the fact that something works 99 times out of 100, as soon as something goes wrong they adopt the Daily Mail mentality of "Questions need to be asked".

To not put too fine a point on it, an example of this is that the general public ignored the multi-faceted benefits of being in the EU to vote for Brexit because a single Baltic wholesale shop appeared on the high street of their ghastly provincial town.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, William T.D. Stickers said:

What is difficult to understand?

Think about how fucking stupid the average cunt is. Then try and rationalise that the average aforementioned fuckwits, the general public, are allowed manual control of a tonne or so of metal, that is capable of hurtling around at 120MPH.

Driverless cars will ease traffic flow, improve fuel economy, and greatly reduce casualties on the roads through much better driving. Every instance of machine error will be mitigated against, having avoided thousands of instances of human error.

How do you know this will actually happen? You’re merely quoting what the manufacturers are telling everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...