Republican Cunts are Bad Losers

[Mrs Roops]

1 hour ago, King Billy said:

snopes. com. Are you fucking serious? About as trustworthy as you. Total left wing bogus organisation. Fuck off.

...and the source of your made-up fact is? 

[Decimus]

7 minutes ago, Eddie said:

That cunt has inherited a fortune and deserted the car wash, I am going back over his ott house next week to fill him in good and proper. Expect a video.

There's nothing worse than new money, Ed. The plastic Corinthian columns are bad enough, but I imagine he's also filled the place with faux marble statues and leopard print throws. Give him a solid kick in the balls from me.

[Frank]

1 hour ago, Decimus said:

There's nothing worse than new money, Ed. The plastic Corinthian columns are bad enough, but I imagine he's also filled the place with faux marble statues and leopard print throws. Give him a solid kick in the balls from me.

I could be wrong, but no money is probably worse than new money. What do I know? Like-farming fucking idiot. 

[Eddie]

1 hour ago, Decimus said:

There's nothing worse than new money, Ed. The plastic Corinthian columns are bad enough, but I imagine he's also filled the place with faux marble statues and leopard print throws. Give him a solid kick in the balls from me.

It’s not great, he has a tacky soulless  bar, pool, cinema complex in the basement that any classless premier footballer would insist on. He demonstrated the cinema with the film ‘top gun’ enough said. 

[Cuntybaws]

5 minutes ago, Eddie said:

He demonstrated the cinema with the film ‘top gun’ enough said. 

This is what I call a target-rich environment.

[Decimus]

36 minutes ago, Frank said:

I could be wrong, but no money is probably worse than new money. What do I know? Like-farming fucking idiot. 

And 60 likes out of 68 posts is better than 23 out of 68. But what do I know?

Bitter. And shit.

[Decimus]

29 minutes ago, Eddie said:

It’s not great, he has a tacky soulless  bar, pool, cinema complex in the basement that any classless premier footballer would insist on. He demonstrated the cinema with the film ‘top gun’ enough said. 

What's the kitchen like?

I imagine that it's better than the galley one with formica worktops and photos of ugly children strewn about everywhere that another member cooks his super noodles in.

 

[Eddie]

https://ibb.co/6Y32NJs

[King Billy]

On 07/11/2020 at 02:28, Goober said:

This is exactly the sort of baseless soundbite your orange poster boy makes, but it don't cut it here because I have the same forum that you do to respond and refute with facts. So make a point and back it up with facts, otherwise moderate your own ridiculous opinions.

I've no agenda and I couldn't give a fuck about likes so I can say what I like and, if you're spouting more right wing bollocks, make you look stupid. 

Billy, to be clear, I actively don't seek out enemies here, hence why I have few (as far as I know). However, I'm perfectly happy to fight a position. Facts will always trump opinion. If you have an opinion, you're absolutely entitled to it, however if you state 'alternative' facts, then I'll rip them apart. This is the very basis of reasoned debate that Trump can't handle and it's his downfall. 

The US constitution states that each individual State legislature determines the voting procedures, is final  and is not a matter that State judiciary can reverse. Pennsylvania’s legislature ruled that no votes were to be counted if they were received after 8PM on final polling day. The PA Supreme Court reversed that decision which in itself was an illegal act on behalf of the Governor by a partisan court. SCOTUS now have to rule on that, and if they do their job fairly, in line with the constitution, which I’m sure they will, PA goes to Trump who was over half a million votes ahead at that time. Along with the other States dubiously awarded to Sleepy Joe it’s surely not unreasonable to wait till everything is clear before either party is crowned. Or does the fact that it’s Trump overrule any investigation? The hypocrisy and dishonesty of the demtards is more astounding than any of the alleged Trump actions. Has everybody just forgotten the deception and non stop false accusations of these deep state leftist characters for 4 and a half years to try and bring down the President? He has ever right to call these criminals out for cheating.

[King Billy]

22 hours ago, Mrs Roops said:

...and the source of your made-up fact is? 

Who runs snopes? And you just need to look at the ‘facts’ they verify and the ‘facts’ they don’t. Open your eyes luv. They’re as crooked as you’re insufferable.

[Goober]

1 hour ago, King Billy said:

The US constitution states that each individual State legislature determines the voting procedures, is final  and is not a matter that State judiciary can reverse. Pennsylvania’s legislature ruled that no votes were to be counted if they were received after 8PM on final polling day. The PA Supreme Court reversed that decision which in itself was an illegal act on behalf of the Governor by a partisan court. SCOTUS now have to rule on that, and if they do their job fairly, in line with the constitution, which I’m sure they will, PA goes to Trump who was over half a million votes ahead at that time. Along with the other States dubiously awarded to Sleepy Joe it’s surely not unreasonable to wait till everything is clear before either party is crowned. Or does the fact that it’s Trump overrule any investigation? The hypocrisy and dishonesty of the demtards is more astounding than any of the alleged Trump actions. Has everybody just forgotten the deception and non stop false accusations of these deep state leftist characters for 4 and a half years to try and bring down the President? He has ever right to call these criminals out for cheating.

You've made some inaccurate statements there, Billy. 

State courts can and frequently do become involved in voting procedures, particularly where parts of the state law are either illegal or unclear. 

You're conflating mail in ballots with late arriving ballots. The huge majority of mail in ballots did not arrive late and are 100% legal. Even if some late arriving ones did mistakenly get included in the count  and are subsequently thrown out there won't be enough to affect the result. 

The GOP and Trump campaign have a constitutional right to challenge the results. If there's genuinely a fraud issue then they absolutely should. 

The level of fraud required to reverse the predicted result just doesn't exist and right wing sources repeatedly screaming it as loud as they can doesn't make it true 

We'll see the outcome in a few weeks, that's assuming any of these cases, many of which are completely without merit, even make it as far as SCOTUS. The chances of Trump staying in the White House are unbelievably small. 

Maybe in 4 years time he can have another go. If he's up against Harris he'll likely win. 

[Mrs Roops]

4 hours ago, King Billy said:

The US constitution states that each individual State legislature determines the voting procedures, is final  and is not a matter that State judiciary can reverse. Pennsylvania’s legislature ruled that no votes were to be counted if they were received after 8PM on final polling day. The PA Supreme Court reversed that decision which in itself was an illegal act on behalf of the Governor by a partisan court. SCOTUS now have to rule on that, and if they do their job fairly, in line with the constitution, which I’m sure they will, PA goes to Trump who was over half a million votes ahead at that time. Along with the other States dubiously awarded to Sleepy Joe it’s surely not unreasonable to wait till everything is clear before either party is crowned. Or does the fact that it’s Trump overrule any investigation? The hypocrisy and dishonesty of the demtards is more astounding than any of the alleged Trump actions. Has everybody just forgotten the deception and non stop false accusations of these deep state leftist characters for 4 and a half years to try and bring down the President? He has ever right to call these criminals out for cheating.

The recent sore loser petition at Pennsylvania is a case in point that the GOP is spewing out frivolous law suites to create a cloud of suspicion and unfounded Republican conspiracy theories. This I'm sure will ultimately backfire on them. Last Friday, Justice Alito (a known conservative and appointee of Republican President G W Bush) to the US Supreme Court granted a GOP petition that Pennsylvania must segregate late postal ballots as required by law. In fact Pennsylvanian election officials stated that they were already doing that and GOP lawyers had to admit that had no evidence to the contrary. As the late ballots total no more than 5000 votes this will make no difference to the result if the votes are excluded which is highly unlikely in any case.

[Mrs Roops]

1 hour ago, King Billy said:

Who runs snopes? And you just need to look at the ‘facts’ they verify and the ‘facts’ they don’t. Open your eyes luv. They’re as crooked as you’re insufferable.

...which doesn't actually answer the question, but that's the Trump way, repeat an allegation without providing any evidence to back it up.

[King Billy]

1 hour ago, Goober said:

You've made some inaccurate statements there, Billy. 

State courts can and frequently do become involved in voting procedures, particularly where parts of the state law are either illegal or unclear. 

You're conflating mail in ballots with late arriving ballots. The huge majority of mail in ballots did not arrive late and are 100% legal. Even if some late arriving ones did mistakenly get included in the count  and are subsequently thrown out there won't be enough to affect the result. 

The GOP and Trump campaign have a constitutional right to challenge the results. If there's genuinely a fraud issue then they absolutely should. 

The level of fraud required to reverse the predicted result just doesn't exist and right wing sources repeatedly screaming it as loud as they can doesn't make it true 

We'll see the outcome in a few weeks, that's assuming any of these cases, many of which are completely without merit, even make it as far as SCOTUS. The chances of Trump staying in the White House are unbelievably small. 

Maybe in 4 years time he can have another go. If he's up against Harris he'll likely win. 

2016 “The Russians rigged the election.”

2020 “Elections can’t be rigged. This is America.”

Those Democrats eh! 

[King Billy]

1 hour ago, Mrs Roops said:

...which doesn't actually answer the question, but that's the Trump way, repeat an allegation without providing any evidence to back it up.

😂lol 

[Guest Fatty]

On 07/11/2020 at 22:49, Ape™️ said:

Good one Ed - did @Fatty come up with it?

Cunt

[Penny Farthing]

On 08/11/2020 at 12:06, Decimus said:

And 60 likes out of 68 posts is better than 23 out of 68. But what do I know?

Bitter. And shit.

I have won the legal vote.

[camberwell gypsy]

2 hours ago, Goober said:

You've made some inaccurate statements there, Billy. 

State courts can and frequently do become involved in voting procedures, particularly where parts of the state law are either illegal or unclear. 

You're conflating mail in ballots with late arriving ballots. The huge majority of mail in ballots did not arrive late and are 100% legal. Even if some late arriving ones did mistakenly get included in the count  and are subsequently thrown out there won't be enough to affect the result. 

The GOP and Trump campaign have a constitutional right to challenge the results. If there's genuinely a fraud issue then they absolutely should. 

The level of fraud required to reverse the predicted result just doesn't exist and right wing sources repeatedly screaming it as loud as they can doesn't make it true 

We'll see the outcome in a few weeks, that's assuming any of these cases, many of which are completely without merit, even make it as far as SCOTUS. The chances of Trump staying in the White House are unbelievably small. 

Maybe in 4 years time he can have another go. If he's up against Harris he'll likely win. 

Maybe in 4 years time......

Trump will be 78. I can't see the yanks voting for a doddery old fart in his late 70s can you? Oh, wait! 

[Goober]

10 minutes ago, camberwell gypsy said:

Maybe in 4 years time......

Trump will be 78. I can't see the yanks voting for a doddery old fart in his late 70s can you? Oh, wait! 

Precisely. He's not exactly going to fade into obscurity either. 

[Goober]

2 hours ago, King Billy said:

2016 “The Russians rigged the election.”

2020 “Elections can’t be rigged. This is America.”

Those Democrats eh! 

Again, not a valid comparison. You're trying to add 1 and 1 and you're not even getting close to the right answer. 

No one alleged the Russians 'rigged' the election in 2016, only that they attempted to interfere, which is beyond any doubt. 

The question of whether the Trump campaign colluded with that interference, which would have been the illegal element, is, needless to say, another hotly disputed argument altogether. 

[Mrs Roops]

1 hour ago, King Billy said:

😂lol 

Of course. Your go-to reply when you're unable to articulate an answer...

[Eddie]

6 minutes ago, Goober said:

Again, not a valid comparison. You're trying to add 1 and 1 and you're not even getting close to the right answer. 

No one alleged the Russians 'rigged' the election in 2016, only that they attempted to interfere, which is beyond any doubt. 

The question of whether the Trump campaign colluded with that interference, which would have been the illegal element, is, needles to say, another hotly disputed argument altogether. 

the 2000 election was 'won' by gore but lost to bush after the Florida fiasco, nothing new to see here. 

[King Billy]

6 minutes ago, Goober said:

Again, not a valid comparison. You're trying to add 1 and 1 and you're not even getting close to the right answer. 

No one alleged the Russians 'rigged' the election in 2016, only that they attempted to interfere, which is beyond any doubt. 

The question of whether the Trump campaign colluded with that interference, which would have been the illegal element, is, needles to say, another hotly disputed argument altogether. 

Hotly disputed? Not a shred of evidence against Trump. Bundles of evidence that the Steele dossier, paid for by Hillary Clinton was used to try to frame him and his associates. No one should be surprised that the Democrats have cheated the election. They’ve cheated everything for years now. Have a good look as the Dominion system and it’s role in the election, also the role of organisations such as the Clinton Global Initiative in the Diminion system with its DELIAN Project.

[King Billy]

5 minutes ago, Mrs Roops said:

Of course. Your go-to reply when you're unable to articulate an answer...

😂lol

[Mrs Roops]

39 minutes ago, King Billy said:

😂lol

After your affected bout of merriment and mirth, perhaps you could explain the thinking behind your prediction that Trump would win the election by a huge landside. Don't be sheepish now...